Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors

Abstract Introduction The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a popular measure that evaluates personality on the Big-Five model. Apart from its utilization across cultures, the literature did not reveal any meta-analysis for the reliability of the different versions of the BFI and its translations. The cur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waqar Husain, Areen Jamal Haddad, Muhammad Ahmad Husain, Hadeel Ghazzawi, Khaled Trabelsi, Achraf Ammar, Zahra Saif, Amir Pakpour, Haitham Jahrami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02271-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544156160196608
author Waqar Husain
Areen Jamal Haddad
Muhammad Ahmad Husain
Hadeel Ghazzawi
Khaled Trabelsi
Achraf Ammar
Zahra Saif
Amir Pakpour
Haitham Jahrami
author_facet Waqar Husain
Areen Jamal Haddad
Muhammad Ahmad Husain
Hadeel Ghazzawi
Khaled Trabelsi
Achraf Ammar
Zahra Saif
Amir Pakpour
Haitham Jahrami
author_sort Waqar Husain
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a popular measure that evaluates personality on the Big-Five model. Apart from its utilization across cultures, the literature did not reveal any meta-analysis for the reliability of the different versions of the BFI and its translations. The current study carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis (REGEMA) to establish the reliability of the BFI across cultures and languages. Methods We searched 30 databases for the relevant studies from 1991 to mid-November 2024. The studies that we intended to include in our meta-analysis required to have utilized the BFI (44 items) and the BFI-2 (60 items) and have reported Cronbach's alpha or McDonald's omega reliability estimates. Our coded variables included BFI version, sample size, population type, age, gender, clinical state, and reliability. A total of 57 studies (datapoints) published in 34 research articles (involving 43,715 participants; 60.24% women; Mean age = 30.08) from various cultures and languages were finally included. These studies used BFI and BFI-2 in Arabic, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swahili, and Turkish. Data analysis was conducted using the metafor and meta packages in R. The average correlation was computed using a random-effects model and reliability coefficients indicated effect size. I2 and Cochran's Q tests were used to examine heterogeneity, with prediction intervals suggesting genuine influences around the pooled estimate. Using funnel plots, regression-based tests (e.g., Egger's regression, rank correlation), and trim-and-fill imputation, publication bias was adjusted to estimate unbiased effects. Results We calculated the individual and combined reliability of the BFI and BFI-2 across languages and cultures. The results revealed the reliability of all five factors used in the BFI/BFI-2. The BFI estimates provide the following results: openness is estimated at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75; 0.80); conscientiousness is estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.78; 0.82); extraversion is also estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.82); agreeableness is estimated at 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71; 0.76); and neuroticism is estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.82). The BFI-2 estimates are as follows: openness is estimated at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.82; 0.84); conscientiousness is estimated at 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85; 0.87); extraversion is estimated at 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84; 0.86); agreeableness is also estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 81); and neuroticism is estimated at 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88; 0.89). Conclusion The current meta-analysis represents the first reliability analysis of the BFI and the first comparison between its two different versions, the BFI (44 items) and the BFI-2 (60 items). The generalized reliability of both the BFI and BFI-2 were established. The findings confirm that the BFI and BFI-2 have good reliability across all five factors.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9a8ff5ddbaa489699a5f059777e4c93
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-b9a8ff5ddbaa489699a5f059777e4c932025-01-12T12:45:14ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-01-0113112410.1186/s40359-024-02271-xReliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factorsWaqar Husain0Areen Jamal Haddad1Muhammad Ahmad Husain2Hadeel Ghazzawi3Khaled Trabelsi4Achraf Ammar5Zahra Saif6Amir Pakpour7Haitham Jahrami8Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad CampusNutrition and Food Technology Department, Agriculture School, The University of JordanDepartment of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad CampusNutrition and Food Technology Department, Agriculture School, The University of JordanResearch laboratory Education, Motricité, Sport et Santé, EM2S, LR19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of SfaxDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg- University MainzGovernment HospitalsDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping UniversityGovernment HospitalsAbstract Introduction The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a popular measure that evaluates personality on the Big-Five model. Apart from its utilization across cultures, the literature did not reveal any meta-analysis for the reliability of the different versions of the BFI and its translations. The current study carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis (REGEMA) to establish the reliability of the BFI across cultures and languages. Methods We searched 30 databases for the relevant studies from 1991 to mid-November 2024. The studies that we intended to include in our meta-analysis required to have utilized the BFI (44 items) and the BFI-2 (60 items) and have reported Cronbach's alpha or McDonald's omega reliability estimates. Our coded variables included BFI version, sample size, population type, age, gender, clinical state, and reliability. A total of 57 studies (datapoints) published in 34 research articles (involving 43,715 participants; 60.24% women; Mean age = 30.08) from various cultures and languages were finally included. These studies used BFI and BFI-2 in Arabic, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swahili, and Turkish. Data analysis was conducted using the metafor and meta packages in R. The average correlation was computed using a random-effects model and reliability coefficients indicated effect size. I2 and Cochran's Q tests were used to examine heterogeneity, with prediction intervals suggesting genuine influences around the pooled estimate. Using funnel plots, regression-based tests (e.g., Egger's regression, rank correlation), and trim-and-fill imputation, publication bias was adjusted to estimate unbiased effects. Results We calculated the individual and combined reliability of the BFI and BFI-2 across languages and cultures. The results revealed the reliability of all five factors used in the BFI/BFI-2. The BFI estimates provide the following results: openness is estimated at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75; 0.80); conscientiousness is estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.78; 0.82); extraversion is also estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.82); agreeableness is estimated at 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71; 0.76); and neuroticism is estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.82). The BFI-2 estimates are as follows: openness is estimated at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.82; 0.84); conscientiousness is estimated at 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85; 0.87); extraversion is estimated at 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84; 0.86); agreeableness is also estimated at 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79; 81); and neuroticism is estimated at 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88; 0.89). Conclusion The current meta-analysis represents the first reliability analysis of the BFI and the first comparison between its two different versions, the BFI (44 items) and the BFI-2 (60 items). The generalized reliability of both the BFI and BFI-2 were established. The findings confirm that the BFI and BFI-2 have good reliability across all five factors.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02271-xBig-Five InventoryCulturesGeneralizabilityMeta-analysisReliability
spellingShingle Waqar Husain
Areen Jamal Haddad
Muhammad Ahmad Husain
Hadeel Ghazzawi
Khaled Trabelsi
Achraf Ammar
Zahra Saif
Amir Pakpour
Haitham Jahrami
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
BMC Psychology
Big-Five Inventory
Cultures
Generalizability
Meta-analysis
Reliability
title Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
title_full Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
title_fullStr Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
title_full_unstemmed Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
title_short Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors
title_sort reliability generalization meta analysis of the internal consistency of the big five inventory bfi by comparing bfi 44 items and bfi 2 60 items versions controlling for age sex language factors
topic Big-Five Inventory
Cultures
Generalizability
Meta-analysis
Reliability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02271-x
work_keys_str_mv AT waqarhusain reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT areenjamalhaddad reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT muhammadahmadhusain reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT hadeelghazzawi reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT khaledtrabelsi reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT achrafammar reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT zahrasaif reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT amirpakpour reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors
AT haithamjahrami reliabilitygeneralizationmetaanalysisoftheinternalconsistencyofthebigfiveinventorybfibycomparingbfi44itemsandbfi260itemsversionscontrollingforagesexlanguagefactors