FEATURES OF APPOINTMENT AND CONDUCT OF SPEECH LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE (SEMANTIC- TEXTUAL AND AUTHORIAL EXPERTISE): JUDICIAL PRACTICE
The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of linguistic expertise in the judicial process. The scientific work characterizes the concept of linguistic expertise, highlights the types of linguistic expertise, analyzes the features and differences of semantic-textual and author expert...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Alfred Nobel University
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Alfred Nobel University Journal of Law |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://law.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2023/1/8.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of linguistic expertise in the judicial
process. The scientific work characterizes the concept of linguistic expertise, highlights the types of
linguistic expertise, analyzes the features and differences of semantic-textual and author expertise,
identifies the objects of expertise, describes the range of questions posed for linguistic expertise. It
has been established that the linguistic expertise of speech plays an important role during the
investigation of criminal proceedings and the consideration of court cases, and its conclusions serve as
a basis for protecting the interests of the state and its citizens. It is noted that the forensic semantic-
textual expertise of the text within the framework of court proceedings is carried out in accordance
with the norms defined by the Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic expertises and
expert studies and Scientific and methodological recommendations on the preparation and
appointment of forensic expertises and expert studies, approved by the order of the Ministry of Justice
of Ukraine. In turn, the legal nature of linguistic expertise is due to the availability of special knowledge
in the field of science, which allows establishing or refuting facts that are of great importance in the
consideration of a court case and the resolution of a dispute. It has been analyzed that the direct
theoretical study of linguistic expertise does not allow to form a holistic and objective idea about its
nature, as well as its importance in the process of law enforcement and establishing the truth in the
case. In particular, the procedural procedure for the appointment of a linguistic expertise was clarified,
and the judicial practice regarding the consideration of cases in which a linguistic expertise was
appointed was analyzed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 3041-2218 3041-2226 |