The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain
For good reasons, most criticism of the term neuronovel has focused on the impact that the eye-catching and fashionable prefix “neuro” has upon the stem, “novel.” For less clear reasons, the canon of neuronovels (primarily bequeathed by Marco Roth) has tended to pivot on a homogeneously white-male a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Association for American Studies
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of American Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/17459 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841558277837553664 |
|---|---|
| author | Stephen J. Burn |
| author_facet | Stephen J. Burn |
| author_sort | Stephen J. Burn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For good reasons, most criticism of the term neuronovel has focused on the impact that the eye-catching and fashionable prefix “neuro” has upon the stem, “novel.” For less clear reasons, the canon of neuronovels (primarily bequeathed by Marco Roth) has tended to pivot on a homogeneously white-male axis, dominated by Mark Haddon, Jonathan Lethem, Ian McEwan, and Richard Powers. This essay explores what we might learn by enlarging the scale of our analysis and looking beyond the novel, to see how a writer’s engagement with neuroculture evolves across novels, poems, and short fictions; and looking beyond the familiar cast of “neuronovelists” to resist its gender asymmetry. Because Joyce Carol Oates’s writing about the brain both spans almost half a century, and crosses multiple genres, this essay takes her evolving engagement with split-brain research as a test case to explore how her work highlights the limitations of the label neuronovel. This exploration traces Oates’s changing sense of how we might write about consciousness in the age of neuroscience, as her work develops from reflections on the raw material of consciousness in Wonderland (1971) to her sophisticated and innovative use of split-brain narration in The Man Without a Shadow (2016). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b849b27ecd144bfa966c7ea3cf93fe44 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1991-9336 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | European Association for American Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Journal of American Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-b849b27ecd144bfa966c7ea3cf93fe442025-01-06T09:08:42ZengEuropean Association for American StudiesEuropean Journal of American Studies1991-93362021-12-0116410.4000/ejas.17459The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double BrainStephen J. BurnFor good reasons, most criticism of the term neuronovel has focused on the impact that the eye-catching and fashionable prefix “neuro” has upon the stem, “novel.” For less clear reasons, the canon of neuronovels (primarily bequeathed by Marco Roth) has tended to pivot on a homogeneously white-male axis, dominated by Mark Haddon, Jonathan Lethem, Ian McEwan, and Richard Powers. This essay explores what we might learn by enlarging the scale of our analysis and looking beyond the novel, to see how a writer’s engagement with neuroculture evolves across novels, poems, and short fictions; and looking beyond the familiar cast of “neuronovelists” to resist its gender asymmetry. Because Joyce Carol Oates’s writing about the brain both spans almost half a century, and crosses multiple genres, this essay takes her evolving engagement with split-brain research as a test case to explore how her work highlights the limitations of the label neuronovel. This exploration traces Oates’s changing sense of how we might write about consciousness in the age of neuroscience, as her work develops from reflections on the raw material of consciousness in Wonderland (1971) to her sophisticated and innovative use of split-brain narration in The Man Without a Shadow (2016).https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/17459Joyce Carol Oates; neurofiction; the brain and American literature; gender and neuroscience; split-brain research and fiction |
| spellingShingle | Stephen J. Burn The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain European Journal of American Studies Joyce Carol Oates; neurofiction; the brain and American literature; gender and neuroscience; split-brain research and fiction |
| title | The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain |
| title_full | The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain |
| title_fullStr | The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain |
| title_short | The Gender of the Neuronovel: Joyce Carol Oates and the Double Brain |
| title_sort | gender of the neuronovel joyce carol oates and the double brain |
| topic | Joyce Carol Oates; neurofiction; the brain and American literature; gender and neuroscience; split-brain research and fiction |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/17459 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephenjburn thegenderoftheneuronoveljoycecaroloatesandthedoublebrain AT stephenjburn genderoftheneuronoveljoycecaroloatesandthedoublebrain |