The Debate Between Realism and Formalism in Contemporary International Law (Emphasizing the Procedure of the International Court of Justice)
Legal realism and legal formalism as two methods of judicial decision-making in national and international courts have been hot theoretical and philosophical topics among writers, judges, and lawyers in recent decades. Both methods have supporters and each has presented arguments to strengthen their...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Sepanta Mojtahedzadeh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Law
2024-03-01
|
Series: | پژوهشهای حقوقی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_171944_490b21208127acda7a5469c2a976a918.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Internal Judicial Independence in the EU and Ghosts from the Socialist Past: Why the Court of Justice Should Not Follow AG Pikamäe in Hann-Invest
by: Nika Bačić Selanec, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Correlation of Formal Clarity and Rule of Law
by: E. E. Silantieva
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logics of Collapse)
by: P. Shlag
Published: (2025-01-01) -
International legal framework for the regulation of judicial immunity
by: S. O. Demchenko
Published: (2024-12-01) -
International standards and doctrinal understanding of legal authority as the basis for the formation of the democratic Ukrainian state
by: Kelbya S.
Published: (2024-06-01)