Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect

Abstract Background DNA damage tolerance (DDT) enables replication to continue in the presence of fork stalling lesions. In mammalian cells, DDT is regulated by two independent pathways, controlled by the polymerase REV1 and ubiquitinated PCNA, respectively. Results To determine the molecular and ge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel de Groot, Aldo Spanjaard, Ronak Shah, Maaike Kreft, Ben Morris, Cor Lieftink, Joyce J. I. Catsman, Shirley Ormel, Matilda Ayidah, Bas Pilzecker, Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante, Paul C. M. van den Berk, Roderick L. Beijersbergen, Heinz Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Genome Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03451-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559387899953152
author Daniel de Groot
Aldo Spanjaard
Ronak Shah
Maaike Kreft
Ben Morris
Cor Lieftink
Joyce J. I. Catsman
Shirley Ormel
Matilda Ayidah
Bas Pilzecker
Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante
Paul C. M. van den Berk
Roderick L. Beijersbergen
Heinz Jacobs
author_facet Daniel de Groot
Aldo Spanjaard
Ronak Shah
Maaike Kreft
Ben Morris
Cor Lieftink
Joyce J. I. Catsman
Shirley Ormel
Matilda Ayidah
Bas Pilzecker
Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante
Paul C. M. van den Berk
Roderick L. Beijersbergen
Heinz Jacobs
author_sort Daniel de Groot
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background DNA damage tolerance (DDT) enables replication to continue in the presence of fork stalling lesions. In mammalian cells, DDT is regulated by two independent pathways, controlled by the polymerase REV1 and ubiquitinated PCNA, respectively. Results To determine the molecular and genomic impact of a global DDT defect, we studied PcnaK164R/−;Rev1−/− compound mutants in mouse cells. Double-mutant cells display increased replication stress, hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents, replication speed, and repriming. A whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 screen revealed a strict reliance of double-mutant cells on the CST complex, where CST promotes fork stability. Whole-genome sequencing indicated that this double-mutant DDT defect favors the generation of large, replication-stress inducible deletions of 0.4–4.0 kbp, defined as type 3 deletions. Junction break sites of these deletions reveal microhomology preferences of 1–2 base pairs, differing from the smaller type 1 and type 2 deletions. These differential characteristics suggest the existence of molecularly distinct deletion pathways. Type 3 deletions are abundant in human tumors, can dominate the deletion landscape, and are associated with DNA damage response status and treatment modality. Conclusions Our data highlight the essential contribution of the DDT system to genome maintenance and type 3 deletions as mutational signature of replication stress. The unique characteristics of type 3 deletions implicate the existence of a novel deletion pathway in mice and humans that is counteracted by DDT. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-b67d91180f0e4dcb981bd36e0c862c82
institution Kabale University
issn 1474-760X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genome Biology
spelling doaj-art-b67d91180f0e4dcb981bd36e0c862c822025-01-05T12:31:58ZengBMCGenome Biology1474-760X2024-12-0125112810.1186/s13059-024-03451-zMolecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defectDaniel de Groot0Aldo Spanjaard1Ronak Shah2Maaike Kreft3Ben Morris4Cor Lieftink5Joyce J. I. Catsman6Shirley Ormel7Matilda Ayidah8Bas Pilzecker9Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante10Paul C. M. van den Berk11Roderick L. Beijersbergen12Heinz Jacobs13Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The NKI Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The NKI Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The NKI Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAbstract Background DNA damage tolerance (DDT) enables replication to continue in the presence of fork stalling lesions. In mammalian cells, DDT is regulated by two independent pathways, controlled by the polymerase REV1 and ubiquitinated PCNA, respectively. Results To determine the molecular and genomic impact of a global DDT defect, we studied PcnaK164R/−;Rev1−/− compound mutants in mouse cells. Double-mutant cells display increased replication stress, hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents, replication speed, and repriming. A whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 screen revealed a strict reliance of double-mutant cells on the CST complex, where CST promotes fork stability. Whole-genome sequencing indicated that this double-mutant DDT defect favors the generation of large, replication-stress inducible deletions of 0.4–4.0 kbp, defined as type 3 deletions. Junction break sites of these deletions reveal microhomology preferences of 1–2 base pairs, differing from the smaller type 1 and type 2 deletions. These differential characteristics suggest the existence of molecularly distinct deletion pathways. Type 3 deletions are abundant in human tumors, can dominate the deletion landscape, and are associated with DNA damage response status and treatment modality. Conclusions Our data highlight the essential contribution of the DDT system to genome maintenance and type 3 deletions as mutational signature of replication stress. The unique characteristics of type 3 deletions implicate the existence of a novel deletion pathway in mice and humans that is counteracted by DDT. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03451-z
spellingShingle Daniel de Groot
Aldo Spanjaard
Ronak Shah
Maaike Kreft
Ben Morris
Cor Lieftink
Joyce J. I. Catsman
Shirley Ormel
Matilda Ayidah
Bas Pilzecker
Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante
Paul C. M. van den Berk
Roderick L. Beijersbergen
Heinz Jacobs
Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
Genome Biology
title Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
title_full Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
title_fullStr Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
title_full_unstemmed Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
title_short Molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global DNA damage tolerance defect
title_sort molecular dependencies and genomic consequences of a global dna damage tolerance defect
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03451-z
work_keys_str_mv AT danieldegroot moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT aldospanjaard moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT ronakshah moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT maaikekreft moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT benmorris moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT corlieftink moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT joycejicatsman moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT shirleyormel moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT matildaayidah moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT baspilzecker moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT olimpiaalessandrabuoninfante moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT paulcmvandenberk moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT rodericklbeijersbergen moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect
AT heinzjacobs moleculardependenciesandgenomicconsequencesofaglobaldnadamagetolerancedefect