The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era

Egyptians of the predynastic era had a good decimal number system for counting and addition. Although, up to some times, they had problem in counting beyond a million, by the dawn of their history, Narmer, the founder of the first Egyptian dynasty had accountants that could record 400,000 cows and 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Pourfereidouni, M. Radjabalipour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmmrc.uk.ac.ir/article_4266_1bd421394f182f77d5907d47ab0c2ca8.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560211001704448
author Z. Pourfereidouni
M. Radjabalipour
author_facet Z. Pourfereidouni
M. Radjabalipour
author_sort Z. Pourfereidouni
collection DOAJ
description Egyptians of the predynastic era had a good decimal number system for counting and addition. Although, up to some times, they had problem in counting beyond a million, by the dawn of their history, Narmer, the founder of the first Egyptian dynasty had accountants that could record 400,000 cows and 1,422,000 goats of a war booty. Except for some ambiguities in the case of Mayan number system, specialists in the history of mathematics can guess that  how the counting system of the various civilizations evolved into one of the number systems in base 10, 20, 60, etc. There is a puzzle in the mixture of the  Egyptian decimal and binary number systems which we are going to discuss and present a justification for it. The novelty of the present paper is the study of the evolution of the binary number system from the predynastic Egypt down to the Leibniz era who, by the benefit of  Khwarazmi's  "Indian Arithmetics,"  completed this evolution by representing integers in $0-1$ forms and performing the hybrid decimal/binary Egyptian arithmetic operations purely inside the $0-1$ system. The second author is pleased to dedicate his share of this paper to  Esfandiar Eslami  showing  his love and appreciation for decades of his friendship and collaboration (since 1967) and, of course, the young coauthor joins the joy of this dedication to her former professor.
format Article
id doaj-art-b669a7a93ab347d0bf1a7e2d97f1e32c
institution Kabale University
issn 2251-7952
2645-4505
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
record_format Article
series Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research
spelling doaj-art-b669a7a93ab347d0bf1a7e2d97f1e32c2025-01-04T19:29:49ZengShahid Bahonar University of KermanJournal of Mahani Mathematical Research2251-79522645-45052024-12-0113412010.22103/jmmr.2024.23178.16064266The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz eraZ. Pourfereidouni0M. Radjabalipour1Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, IranDepartment of Mathematics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, IranEgyptians of the predynastic era had a good decimal number system for counting and addition. Although, up to some times, they had problem in counting beyond a million, by the dawn of their history, Narmer, the founder of the first Egyptian dynasty had accountants that could record 400,000 cows and 1,422,000 goats of a war booty. Except for some ambiguities in the case of Mayan number system, specialists in the history of mathematics can guess that  how the counting system of the various civilizations evolved into one of the number systems in base 10, 20, 60, etc. There is a puzzle in the mixture of the  Egyptian decimal and binary number systems which we are going to discuss and present a justification for it. The novelty of the present paper is the study of the evolution of the binary number system from the predynastic Egypt down to the Leibniz era who, by the benefit of  Khwarazmi's  "Indian Arithmetics,"  completed this evolution by representing integers in $0-1$ forms and performing the hybrid decimal/binary Egyptian arithmetic operations purely inside the $0-1$ system. The second author is pleased to dedicate his share of this paper to  Esfandiar Eslami  showing  his love and appreciation for decades of his friendship and collaboration (since 1967) and, of course, the young coauthor joins the joy of this dedication to her former professor.https://jmmrc.uk.ac.ir/article_4266_1bd421394f182f77d5907d47ab0c2ca8.pdfegyptian fractionsbinary systemsbinary logiczero-one
spellingShingle Z. Pourfereidouni
M. Radjabalipour
The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research
egyptian fractions
binary systems
binary logic
zero-one
title The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
title_full The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
title_fullStr The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
title_short The evolution of binary system from predynastic Egypt to Leibniz era
title_sort evolution of binary system from predynastic egypt to leibniz era
topic egyptian fractions
binary systems
binary logic
zero-one
url https://jmmrc.uk.ac.ir/article_4266_1bd421394f182f77d5907d47ab0c2ca8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zpourfereidouni theevolutionofbinarysystemfrompredynasticegypttoleibnizera
AT mradjabalipour theevolutionofbinarysystemfrompredynasticegypttoleibnizera
AT zpourfereidouni evolutionofbinarysystemfrompredynasticegypttoleibnizera
AT mradjabalipour evolutionofbinarysystemfrompredynasticegypttoleibnizera