Team 10’s discourse and Madrid architecture of the second phase of modernity
Madrid architects of the 20th century had little inclination, if any, to be gregarious. Remember their token presence in the first International Congresses of Modern Architecture (CIAM), a presence which had altogether vanished by the time of the fourth CIAM conference, which took place aboard the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Joelho |
| Online Access: | https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/joelho/article/view/6670 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Madrid architects of the 20th century had little inclination, if any, to be gregarious. Remember their token presence in the first International Congresses of Modern Architecture (CIAM), a presence which had altogether vanished by the time of the fourth CIAM conference, which took place aboard the S.S. Patris. The only Spaniards we find in Athens in the summer of 1933 are Raimon Torres Clavé, Josep Lluís Sert, Antonio Bonet Castellana, Josep Torres Clavé, and Cristófol Alzamora. There is no sign of architects from Madrid. So who explained Madrid as a functional city?
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1647-9548 1647-8681 |