Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?

In the article I attempt to specify the uniqueness of the key aesthetics categories. The argument is based on the concept of Pure Form put forward by Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz. I provide an argument for a claim that aesthetic terms categories must remain open, and I try to explain how to understan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piotr Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2024-12-01
Series:Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wuwr.pl/spwr/article/view/15492
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846116200218624000
author Piotr Martin
author_facet Piotr Martin
author_sort Piotr Martin
collection DOAJ
description In the article I attempt to specify the uniqueness of the key aesthetics categories. The argument is based on the concept of Pure Form put forward by Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz. I provide an argument for a claim that aesthetic terms categories must remain open, and I try to explain how to understand their openness. My attempt is based on my own interpretation of Pure Form as a concept belonging to aesthetic theory and associated not only with the creation of a work of art. I argue that the proposed interpretation may be accepted on the condition that we would never be able fully to understand how an object becomes a masterpiece. Pure Form has a dynamic, living, open, performative nature and thus will never be fully understood.
format Article
id doaj-art-b5d8ba2d8f5b4e73b366ce266ebd2d74
institution Kabale University
issn 1895-8001
2957-2460
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
record_format Article
series Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
spelling doaj-art-b5d8ba2d8f5b4e73b366ce266ebd2d742024-12-19T09:35:44ZengWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu WrocławskiegoStudia Philosophica Wratislaviensia1895-80012957-24602024-12-01192395010.19195/1895-8001.19.2.317217Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?Piotr Martinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-2899In the article I attempt to specify the uniqueness of the key aesthetics categories. The argument is based on the concept of Pure Form put forward by Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz. I provide an argument for a claim that aesthetic terms categories must remain open, and I try to explain how to understand their openness. My attempt is based on my own interpretation of Pure Form as a concept belonging to aesthetic theory and associated not only with the creation of a work of art. I argue that the proposed interpretation may be accepted on the condition that we would never be able fully to understand how an object becomes a masterpiece. Pure Form has a dynamic, living, open, performative nature and thus will never be fully understood.https://wuwr.pl/spwr/article/view/15492pure formstanisław ignacy witkiewiczaesthetic theoryphilosophy of art
spellingShingle Piotr Martin
Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
pure form
stanisław ignacy witkiewicz
aesthetic theory
philosophy of art
title Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
title_full Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
title_fullStr Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
title_full_unstemmed Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
title_short Czego nie będziemy wiedzieć o Czystej Formie?
title_sort czego nie bedziemy wiedziec o czystej formie
topic pure form
stanisław ignacy witkiewicz
aesthetic theory
philosophy of art
url https://wuwr.pl/spwr/article/view/15492
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrmartin czegoniebedziemywiedziecoczystejformie