Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors

Most industries are responsible for environmental pollution because their wastewater contains heavy metals that are hazardous. These metals tend to persist indefinitely in the environment, compromising not only human health but also the well-being of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando García Ávila, Janneth Cabrera-Sumba, Sandra Valdez-Pilataxi, Jessica Villalta-Chungata, Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales, Cecilia Alegria-Arnedo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841542384871014400
author Fernando García Ávila
Janneth Cabrera-Sumba
Sandra Valdez-Pilataxi
Jessica Villalta-Chungata
Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales
Cecilia Alegria-Arnedo
author_facet Fernando García Ávila
Janneth Cabrera-Sumba
Sandra Valdez-Pilataxi
Jessica Villalta-Chungata
Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales
Cecilia Alegria-Arnedo
author_sort Fernando García Ávila
collection DOAJ
description Most industries are responsible for environmental pollution because their wastewater contains heavy metals that are hazardous. These metals tend to persist indefinitely in the environment, compromising not only human health but also the well-being of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to analyze the adsorption technology for removing heavy metals in industrial wastewater, evaluating influencing factors, adsorbent materials, applied isotherms and their advantages, through a systematic review of the scientific literature of the last 10 years. To conduct this research, the Scopus digital database was consulted. The search was conducted using a systematic review methodology and the PICO framework to identify, analyze, and interpret data on adsorption technology, factors influencing adsorption, the efficiency of different materials used as adsorbents, and the advantages and disadvantages of adsorption isotherms. To filter the information, the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were followed, which allowed the articles to be selected to answer the research questions posed in this study. Based on the results, it was found that the factors influencing the adsorption of heavy metals include pH (range of 3–9), contact time (range of 10–14,400 min), adsorbent dosage (0.011–20 g/L), temperature (25–30 °C), particle size, and agitation speed (100–800 ppm). Among the most efficient adsorbents are acacia cellulose lignin with 99.8% Cr, bentonite clay with 99% Cu, 96% Cd, and 99% Pb, modified sugarcane bagasse with 96.9% Cu, and activated carbon with 82.8% Cr at pH 3. The least efficient adsorbents are natural moss (54.5% Cr) and biochar from corn husks (20% Cr). The Freundlich isotherm model is the most used, and it can vary depending on the type of adsorbent, the correlation coefficient fit, and the type of heavy metal being treated. Finally, the advantages and limitations of some adsorbents are presented, primarily highlighting their low costs, reusability, and the sustainability they can offer in reducing environmental pollution.
format Article
id doaj-art-b547f59e13a4439bbf611ce6dacf9fec
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-7908
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Cleaner Engineering and Technology
spelling doaj-art-b547f59e13a4439bbf611ce6dacf9fec2025-01-14T04:12:39ZengElsevierCleaner Engineering and Technology2666-79082025-02-0124100879Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factorsFernando García Ávila0Janneth Cabrera-Sumba1Sandra Valdez-Pilataxi2Jessica Villalta-Chungata3Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales4Cecilia Alegria-Arnedo5Universidad de Cuenca, Chemical Sciences Faculty, Cuenca, Ecuador; Environmental Risk Assessment Group in Production and Services Systems (RISKEN), Universidad de Cuenca, EcuadorUniversidad de Cuenca, Chemical Sciences Faculty, Cuenca, EcuadorUniversidad de Cuenca, Chemical Sciences Faculty, Cuenca, EcuadorUniversidad de Cuenca, Chemical Sciences Faculty, Cuenca, EcuadorUniversidad Tecnológica del Perú, Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Lima, Peru; Corresponding author.Departamento Académico de Química, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, PeruMost industries are responsible for environmental pollution because their wastewater contains heavy metals that are hazardous. These metals tend to persist indefinitely in the environment, compromising not only human health but also the well-being of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to analyze the adsorption technology for removing heavy metals in industrial wastewater, evaluating influencing factors, adsorbent materials, applied isotherms and their advantages, through a systematic review of the scientific literature of the last 10 years. To conduct this research, the Scopus digital database was consulted. The search was conducted using a systematic review methodology and the PICO framework to identify, analyze, and interpret data on adsorption technology, factors influencing adsorption, the efficiency of different materials used as adsorbents, and the advantages and disadvantages of adsorption isotherms. To filter the information, the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were followed, which allowed the articles to be selected to answer the research questions posed in this study. Based on the results, it was found that the factors influencing the adsorption of heavy metals include pH (range of 3–9), contact time (range of 10–14,400 min), adsorbent dosage (0.011–20 g/L), temperature (25–30 °C), particle size, and agitation speed (100–800 ppm). Among the most efficient adsorbents are acacia cellulose lignin with 99.8% Cr, bentonite clay with 99% Cu, 96% Cd, and 99% Pb, modified sugarcane bagasse with 96.9% Cu, and activated carbon with 82.8% Cr at pH 3. The least efficient adsorbents are natural moss (54.5% Cr) and biochar from corn husks (20% Cr). The Freundlich isotherm model is the most used, and it can vary depending on the type of adsorbent, the correlation coefficient fit, and the type of heavy metal being treated. Finally, the advantages and limitations of some adsorbents are presented, primarily highlighting their low costs, reusability, and the sustainability they can offer in reducing environmental pollution.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000023Industrial wastewaterAdsorptionIsothermHeavy metal removalFreundlichLangmuir
spellingShingle Fernando García Ávila
Janneth Cabrera-Sumba
Sandra Valdez-Pilataxi
Jessica Villalta-Chungata
Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales
Cecilia Alegria-Arnedo
Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Industrial wastewater
Adsorption
Isotherm
Heavy metal removal
Freundlich
Langmuir
title Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
title_full Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
title_fullStr Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
title_full_unstemmed Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
title_short Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology: Efficiency and influencing factors
title_sort removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using adsorption technology efficiency and influencing factors
topic Industrial wastewater
Adsorption
Isotherm
Heavy metal removal
Freundlich
Langmuir
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000023
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandogarciaavila removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors
AT jannethcabrerasumba removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors
AT sandravaldezpilataxi removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors
AT jessicavillaltachungata removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors
AT lorgiovaldiviezogonzales removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors
AT ceciliaalegriaarnedo removalofheavymetalsinindustrialwastewaterusingadsorptiontechnologyefficiencyandinfluencingfactors