Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner

In Brazil, there are few microPET in use and a quality control protocols standardization are needed to harmonize their use in the research field. Thus, the purpose of this study is to characterize the image quality performance of the microPET scanner (LabPET 4, GE healthcare Technologies, Waukesha,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo, Andréa Vidal Ferreira, Juliana Batista Silva, Marcelo Henrique Mamede
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR) 2019-02-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/580
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317840977395712
author Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo
Andréa Vidal Ferreira
Juliana Batista Silva
Marcelo Henrique Mamede
author_facet Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo
Andréa Vidal Ferreira
Juliana Batista Silva
Marcelo Henrique Mamede
author_sort Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo
collection DOAJ
description In Brazil, there are few microPET in use and a quality control protocols standardization are needed to harmonize their use in the research field. Thus, the purpose of this study is to characterize the image quality performance of the microPET scanner (LabPET 4, GE healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, WI) using the NEMA NU 4/ 2008 standards and specific phantom. The NEMA image-quality (IQ) phantom consists of 3 different regions to analyze distinct characteristics: image noise (%SD), expressed as percentage SD in a uniform region (%SD), recovery coefficient (RC) and Spill-over (SOR) in air and water. The IQ phantom was filled with 18F-FDG calibrated at the beginning of acquisition, placed in the center of the field-of-view (FOV) and measured with the typical whole body imaging protocol. The images were reconstructed with different reconstruction methods (FBP-2D; MLEM-3D and OSEM-3D); with and without high resolution (HR) when possible. The results were compared. The LabPET 4 system produces appropriate image and with performance according to the literature. The present study is an initial step to verify the NEMA NU 4/2008 use in the Brazilian scenario for further standardization.
format Article
id doaj-art-b40d13eefb564e7c81fe87f9a0bd8bba
institution Kabale University
issn 2319-0612
language English
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Brazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR)
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
spelling doaj-art-b40d13eefb564e7c81fe87f9a0bd8bba2025-08-20T03:51:04ZengBrazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR)Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences2319-06122019-02-0172A (Suppl.)10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.580441Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scannerRodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo0Andréa Vidal Ferreira1Juliana Batista Silva2Marcelo Henrique Mamede3Federal University of Minas GeraisCenter of Nuclear Technology Development (CDTN/CNEN);Center of Nuclear Technology Development (CDTN/CNEN);Center of Nuclear Technology Development (CDTN/CNEN); Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)In Brazil, there are few microPET in use and a quality control protocols standardization are needed to harmonize their use in the research field. Thus, the purpose of this study is to characterize the image quality performance of the microPET scanner (LabPET 4, GE healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, WI) using the NEMA NU 4/ 2008 standards and specific phantom. The NEMA image-quality (IQ) phantom consists of 3 different regions to analyze distinct characteristics: image noise (%SD), expressed as percentage SD in a uniform region (%SD), recovery coefficient (RC) and Spill-over (SOR) in air and water. The IQ phantom was filled with 18F-FDG calibrated at the beginning of acquisition, placed in the center of the field-of-view (FOV) and measured with the typical whole body imaging protocol. The images were reconstructed with different reconstruction methods (FBP-2D; MLEM-3D and OSEM-3D); with and without high resolution (HR) when possible. The results were compared. The LabPET 4 system produces appropriate image and with performance according to the literature. The present study is an initial step to verify the NEMA NU 4/2008 use in the Brazilian scenario for further standardization.https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/580image qualitypositron emission tomographynema.
spellingShingle Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo
Andréa Vidal Ferreira
Juliana Batista Silva
Marcelo Henrique Mamede
Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
image quality
positron emission tomography
nema.
title Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
title_full Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
title_fullStr Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
title_full_unstemmed Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
title_short Image quality assessment using NEMA NU 4/2008 standards in small animal PET scanner
title_sort image quality assessment using nema nu 4 2008 standards in small animal pet scanner
topic image quality
positron emission tomography
nema.
url https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/580
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigomodestogadelhagontijo imagequalityassessmentusingnemanu42008standardsinsmallanimalpetscanner
AT andreavidalferreira imagequalityassessmentusingnemanu42008standardsinsmallanimalpetscanner
AT julianabatistasilva imagequalityassessmentusingnemanu42008standardsinsmallanimalpetscanner
AT marcelohenriquemamede imagequalityassessmentusingnemanu42008standardsinsmallanimalpetscanner