Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención
The Criminal Code and the 4/2015 Organic Law regulating the protection of the citizens security have criminalised disobedience as an illegal act. People need to know what conduct constitutes a criminal offence and what is considered an administrative offence. It is even worth considering whether, fr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP)
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Revista Vasca de Administración Pública |
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841550064913219584 |
|---|---|
| author | José Ignacio Cubero Marcos |
| author_facet | José Ignacio Cubero Marcos |
| author_sort | José Ignacio Cubero Marcos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Criminal Code and the 4/2015 Organic Law regulating the protection of the citizens security have criminalised disobedience as an illegal act. People need to know what conduct constitutes a criminal offence and what is considered an administrative offence. It is even worth considering whether, from the legislator¿s perspective, criminal policy makes it advisable to decriminalise it, making it an administrative offence. To all this, three issues should be added: the deficient criminalisation to distinguish between the two offences, which has forced the jurisprudence to make a pronouncement; two, the legal consequences that the flagrant and immediate commission of disobedience entails for the freedom of movement of the perpetrator. It should be borne in mind that an individual can be arrested at the very moment when the typical conduct is carried out, which happened on many occasions during the state of alarm. Finally, the legislator should consider decriminalising disobedience in accordance with the principle of minimum intervention and the last resort of criminal law. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b37c4e04d5fd4287a2f5ff3ecf4e6e9b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0211-9560 2695-5407 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Vasca de Administración Pública |
| spelling | doaj-art-b37c4e04d5fd4287a2f5ff3ecf4e6e9b2025-01-10T09:50:55ZspaInstituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP)Revista Vasca de Administración Pública0211-95602695-54072024-12-01130Derecho Penal (delitos y faltas)103132https://doi.org/10.47623/ivap-rvap.130.2024.03Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervenciónJosé Ignacio Cubero Marcos0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-8484Profesor Titular de Derecho Administrativo Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko UnibertsitateaThe Criminal Code and the 4/2015 Organic Law regulating the protection of the citizens security have criminalised disobedience as an illegal act. People need to know what conduct constitutes a criminal offence and what is considered an administrative offence. It is even worth considering whether, from the legislator¿s perspective, criminal policy makes it advisable to decriminalise it, making it an administrative offence. To all this, three issues should be added: the deficient criminalisation to distinguish between the two offences, which has forced the jurisprudence to make a pronouncement; two, the legal consequences that the flagrant and immediate commission of disobedience entails for the freedom of movement of the perpetrator. It should be borne in mind that an individual can be arrested at the very moment when the typical conduct is carried out, which happened on many occasions during the state of alarm. Finally, the legislator should consider decriminalising disobedience in accordance with the principle of minimum intervention and the last resort of criminal law.disobedience. criminalisationfreedom of movementsstate ofalertminimal intervention |
| spellingShingle | José Ignacio Cubero Marcos Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención Revista Vasca de Administración Pública disobedience. criminalisation freedom of movements state ofalert minimal intervention |
| title | Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención |
| title_full | Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención |
| title_fullStr | Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención |
| title_full_unstemmed | Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención |
| title_short | Los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infracción administrativa: mandato de tipificación, libertad ambulatoria y mínima intervención |
| title_sort | los difusos contornos para distinguir la desobediencia a la autoridad como delito y como infraccion administrativa mandato de tipificacion libertad ambulatoria y minima intervencion |
| topic | disobedience. criminalisation freedom of movements state ofalert minimal intervention |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joseignaciocuberomarcos losdifusoscontornosparadistinguirladesobedienciaalaautoridadcomodelitoycomoinfraccionadministrativamandatodetipificacionlibertadambulatoriayminimaintervencion |