Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308

IntroductionBrucellosis is endemic in bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas.MethodsA comparative study was conducted using data from naive (n = 82 and 67, respectively) and Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccinated (n-99 and 29, respectively) bison and elk experimenta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. C. Olsen, P. M. Boggiatto, E. J. Putz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527849752723456
author S. C. Olsen
P. M. Boggiatto
E. J. Putz
author_facet S. C. Olsen
P. M. Boggiatto
E. J. Putz
author_sort S. C. Olsen
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionBrucellosis is endemic in bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas.MethodsA comparative study was conducted using data from naive (n = 82 and 67, respectively) and Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccinated (n-99 and 29, respectively) bison and elk experimentally challenged with virulent B. abortus strain during pregnancy.ResultsThe incidence of abortion, fetal infection, uterine or mammary infection, or infection in maternal tissues after experimental challenge was greater (p < 0.05) in naïve and vaccinated bison when compared to similar groups in elk. Vaccinated bison had lower (p < 0.002) abortion rates and recovery of Brucella from fetal or uterine/mammary tissues when compared to naïve bison. Vaccinated elk had reduced (p < 0.01) rates of maternal infection, but rates of abortion and fetal or uterine/mammary infection did not differ (p > 0.05) from naïve elk. Naïve and vaccinated bison had greater (p < 0.05) Brucella colonization in placentomes, and parotid and supramammary lymphatic tissues when compared to elk. In elk or bison that aborted, mean colonization in placentome tissues were typically more than 5 logs higher than in animals that did not abort.DiscussionThe results of our study suggest differences in disease pathogenesis between these two wildlife reservoirs of B. abortus.
format Article
id doaj-art-b23c30096b8f48b0b241c88a78e1ee57
institution Kabale University
issn 2297-1769
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj-art-b23c30096b8f48b0b241c88a78e1ee572025-01-15T06:10:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692025-01-011110.3389/fvets.2024.15194531519453Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308S. C. OlsenP. M. BoggiattoE. J. PutzIntroductionBrucellosis is endemic in bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas.MethodsA comparative study was conducted using data from naive (n = 82 and 67, respectively) and Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccinated (n-99 and 29, respectively) bison and elk experimentally challenged with virulent B. abortus strain during pregnancy.ResultsThe incidence of abortion, fetal infection, uterine or mammary infection, or infection in maternal tissues after experimental challenge was greater (p < 0.05) in naïve and vaccinated bison when compared to similar groups in elk. Vaccinated bison had lower (p < 0.002) abortion rates and recovery of Brucella from fetal or uterine/mammary tissues when compared to naïve bison. Vaccinated elk had reduced (p < 0.01) rates of maternal infection, but rates of abortion and fetal or uterine/mammary infection did not differ (p > 0.05) from naïve elk. Naïve and vaccinated bison had greater (p < 0.05) Brucella colonization in placentomes, and parotid and supramammary lymphatic tissues when compared to elk. In elk or bison that aborted, mean colonization in placentome tissues were typically more than 5 logs higher than in animals that did not abort.DiscussionThe results of our study suggest differences in disease pathogenesis between these two wildlife reservoirs of B. abortus.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453/fullbison (Bison bison)elk (Cervus canadensis)Brucella abortus 2308Brucellapathogenesis
spellingShingle S. C. Olsen
P. M. Boggiatto
E. J. Putz
Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
bison (Bison bison)
elk (Cervus canadensis)
Brucella abortus 2308
Brucella
pathogenesis
title Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
title_full Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
title_fullStr Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
title_short Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308
title_sort comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with brucella abortus strain 2308
topic bison (Bison bison)
elk (Cervus canadensis)
Brucella abortus 2308
Brucella
pathogenesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453/full
work_keys_str_mv AT scolsen comparisonofbisonandelksusceptibilitytoexperimentalchallengewithbrucellaabortusstrain2308
AT pmboggiatto comparisonofbisonandelksusceptibilitytoexperimentalchallengewithbrucellaabortusstrain2308
AT ejputz comparisonofbisonandelksusceptibilitytoexperimentalchallengewithbrucellaabortusstrain2308