Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example

Background: Despite consensus within the evaluation community about what is distinctive about evaluation, confusion among stakeholders and other professions abounds. The evaluation literature describes how those in the social sciences continue to view evaluation as applied social science and part o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Aarti P. Bellara, Anthony J. Gambino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/473
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561354927865856
author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
Aarti P. Bellara
Anthony J. Gambino
author_facet Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
Aarti P. Bellara
Anthony J. Gambino
author_sort Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite consensus within the evaluation community about what is distinctive about evaluation, confusion among stakeholders and other professions abounds. The evaluation literature describes how those in the social sciences continue to view evaluation as applied social science and part of what they already know how to do, with the implication that no additional training beyond the traditional social sciences is needed. Given the lack of broader understanding of the specialized role of evaluation, the field struggles with how best to communicate about evaluation to stakeholders and other professions. Purpose: This paper addresses the need to clearly communicate what is distinctive about evaluation to stakeholders and other professions by offering a conceptual tool that can be used in dialogue with others. Specifically, we adapt a personnel evaluation framework to map out what is distinctive about what evaluators know and can do. We then compare this map with the knowledge and skill needed in a related profession (i.e., assessment) in order to reveal how the professions differ.  Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. Findings: We argue that using a conceptual tool such as the one presented in this paper with comparative case examples would clarify for outsiders the distinct work of evaluators. Additionally, we explain how this conceptual tool is flexible and could be extended by evaluation practitioners in a myriad of ways.
format Article
id doaj-art-b1af457c100c4ec39199a2884724fc94
institution Kabale University
issn 1556-8180
language English
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
record_format Article
series Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
spelling doaj-art-b1af457c100c4ec39199a2884724fc942025-01-03T01:46:08ZengThe Evaluation Center at Western Michigan UniversityJournal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation1556-81802017-09-01132910.56645/jmde.v13i29.473Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case ExampleBianca Montrosse-Moorhead0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347Aarti P. Bellara1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-1715Anthony J. Gambino2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-1997University of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of Connecticut Background: Despite consensus within the evaluation community about what is distinctive about evaluation, confusion among stakeholders and other professions abounds. The evaluation literature describes how those in the social sciences continue to view evaluation as applied social science and part of what they already know how to do, with the implication that no additional training beyond the traditional social sciences is needed. Given the lack of broader understanding of the specialized role of evaluation, the field struggles with how best to communicate about evaluation to stakeholders and other professions. Purpose: This paper addresses the need to clearly communicate what is distinctive about evaluation to stakeholders and other professions by offering a conceptual tool that can be used in dialogue with others. Specifically, we adapt a personnel evaluation framework to map out what is distinctive about what evaluators know and can do. We then compare this map with the knowledge and skill needed in a related profession (i.e., assessment) in order to reveal how the professions differ.  Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. Findings: We argue that using a conceptual tool such as the one presented in this paper with comparative case examples would clarify for outsiders the distinct work of evaluators. Additionally, we explain how this conceptual tool is flexible and could be extended by evaluation practitioners in a myriad of ways. https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/473evaluation knowledgeevaluation skillprofessionprofessionalization
spellingShingle Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
Aarti P. Bellara
Anthony J. Gambino
Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
evaluation knowledge
evaluation skill
profession
professionalization
title Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
title_full Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
title_fullStr Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
title_full_unstemmed Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
title_short Communicating About Evaluation: A Conceptual Model and Case Example
title_sort communicating about evaluation a conceptual model and case example
topic evaluation knowledge
evaluation skill
profession
professionalization
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/473
work_keys_str_mv AT biancamontrossemoorhead communicatingaboutevaluationaconceptualmodelandcaseexample
AT aartipbellara communicatingaboutevaluationaconceptualmodelandcaseexample
AT anthonyjgambino communicatingaboutevaluationaconceptualmodelandcaseexample