Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide

Wigner’s classification has led to the insight that projective unitary representations play a prominent role in quantum mechanics. The physics literature often states that the theory of projective unitary representations can be reduced to the theory of ordinary unitary representations by enlarging t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lehel Csillag, Julio Marny Hoff da Silva, Tudor Pătuleanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Universe
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/10/12/448
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846102519034413056
author Lehel Csillag
Julio Marny Hoff da Silva
Tudor Pătuleanu
author_facet Lehel Csillag
Julio Marny Hoff da Silva
Tudor Pătuleanu
author_sort Lehel Csillag
collection DOAJ
description Wigner’s classification has led to the insight that projective unitary representations play a prominent role in quantum mechanics. The physics literature often states that the theory of projective unitary representations can be reduced to the theory of ordinary unitary representations by enlarging the group of physical symmetries. Nevertheless, the enlargement process is not always described explicitly: it is unclear in which cases the enlargement has to be conducted on the universal cover, a central extension, or a central extension of the universal cover. On the other hand, in the mathematical literature, projective unitary representations have been extensively studied, and famous theorems such as the theorems of Bargmann and Cassinelli have been achieved. The present article bridges the two: we provide a precise, step-by-step guide on describing projective unitary representations as unitary representations of the enlarged group. Particular focus is paid to the difference between algebraic and topological obstructions. To build the bridge mentioned above, we present a detailed review of the difference between group cohomology and Lie group cohomology. This culminates in classifying Lie group central extensions by smooth cocycles around the identity. Finally, the take-away message is a hands-on algorithm that takes the symmetry group of a given quantum theory as input and provides the enlarged group as output. This algorithm is applied to several cases of physical interest. We also briefly outline a generalization of Bargmann’s theory to time-dependent phases using Hilbert bundles.
format Article
id doaj-art-b17f179f1bad4ebeb642b5d13f645464
institution Kabale University
issn 2218-1997
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Universe
spelling doaj-art-b17f179f1bad4ebeb642b5d13f6454642024-12-27T14:57:16ZengMDPI AGUniverse2218-19972024-12-01101244810.3390/universe10120448Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s GuideLehel Csillag0Julio Marny Hoff da Silva1Tudor Pătuleanu2Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University, Iuliu Maniu Street 50, 500091 Brașov, RomâniaDepartamento de Física, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha, 333, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, BrazilDepartment of Physics, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, RomâniaWigner’s classification has led to the insight that projective unitary representations play a prominent role in quantum mechanics. The physics literature often states that the theory of projective unitary representations can be reduced to the theory of ordinary unitary representations by enlarging the group of physical symmetries. Nevertheless, the enlargement process is not always described explicitly: it is unclear in which cases the enlargement has to be conducted on the universal cover, a central extension, or a central extension of the universal cover. On the other hand, in the mathematical literature, projective unitary representations have been extensively studied, and famous theorems such as the theorems of Bargmann and Cassinelli have been achieved. The present article bridges the two: we provide a precise, step-by-step guide on describing projective unitary representations as unitary representations of the enlarged group. Particular focus is paid to the difference between algebraic and topological obstructions. To build the bridge mentioned above, we present a detailed review of the difference between group cohomology and Lie group cohomology. This culminates in classifying Lie group central extensions by smooth cocycles around the identity. Finally, the take-away message is a hands-on algorithm that takes the symmetry group of a given quantum theory as input and provides the enlarged group as output. This algorithm is applied to several cases of physical interest. We also briefly outline a generalization of Bargmann’s theory to time-dependent phases using Hilbert bundles.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/10/12/448projective representationcentral extensionuniversal coverlifting problem
spellingShingle Lehel Csillag
Julio Marny Hoff da Silva
Tudor Pătuleanu
Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
Universe
projective representation
central extension
universal cover
lifting problem
title Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
title_full Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
title_fullStr Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
title_full_unstemmed Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
title_short Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
title_sort enlargement of symmetry groups in physics a practitioner s guide
topic projective representation
central extension
universal cover
lifting problem
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/10/12/448
work_keys_str_mv AT lehelcsillag enlargementofsymmetrygroupsinphysicsapractitionersguide
AT juliomarnyhoffdasilva enlargementofsymmetrygroupsinphysicsapractitionersguide
AT tudorpatuleanu enlargementofsymmetrygroupsinphysicsapractitionersguide