Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care
Background: The opportunities of perinatal medicine have improved, but this has also been accompanied by increasing ethical challenges. Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) could support medical teams facing these. However, nothing is currently known about the availability, utilization and ev...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Children |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/11/1349 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846153966938750976 |
|---|---|
| author | Pia Göbert Pia von Blanckenburg Rolf F. Maier Carola Seifart |
| author_facet | Pia Göbert Pia von Blanckenburg Rolf F. Maier Carola Seifart |
| author_sort | Pia Göbert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The opportunities of perinatal medicine have improved, but this has also been accompanied by increasing ethical challenges. Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) could support medical teams facing these. However, nothing is currently known about the availability, utilization and evaluation of CEC in German neonatology units. Methods: This study was designed as a national, descriptive, mixed quantitative–qualitative questionnaire study. The head physicians of the pediatric departments and the heads (medical and nursing) of the corresponding neonatal intensive care units of the 213 German perinatal centers were asked to participate. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents (responding rate 24.4–38.0%) stated that CEC are established and available. However, utilization is rather low [rarely N = 40 (54.1%), never N = 12, (16.2%), occasionally N = 19 (25.7%)], although it was rated as very helpful. There was a significant correlation between utilization and perceived general usefulness (r = 0.224, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and support (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001); whereas evaluations differed significantly between professional groups (t = −2.298, <i>p</i> = 0.23, Cohen’s d = 0.42). Conclusions: The contradiction between the low utilization despite positive evaluations could be related to perceived hurdles. These and the different perceptions within the professional groups give rise to the consideration of whether alternative approaches, e.g., liaison services, would be preferable in neonatology. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b10638a25f034ce6b3d3c96fa403bb76 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2227-9067 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Children |
| spelling | doaj-art-b10638a25f034ce6b3d3c96fa403bb762024-11-26T17:57:33ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672024-11-011111134910.3390/children11111349Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive CarePia Göbert0Pia von Blanckenburg1Rolf F. Maier2Carola Seifart3Hospital for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, 35037 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, GermanyHospital for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, 35037 Marburg, GermanyEthics in Medicine Unit, Department of Human Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, GermanyBackground: The opportunities of perinatal medicine have improved, but this has also been accompanied by increasing ethical challenges. Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) could support medical teams facing these. However, nothing is currently known about the availability, utilization and evaluation of CEC in German neonatology units. Methods: This study was designed as a national, descriptive, mixed quantitative–qualitative questionnaire study. The head physicians of the pediatric departments and the heads (medical and nursing) of the corresponding neonatal intensive care units of the 213 German perinatal centers were asked to participate. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents (responding rate 24.4–38.0%) stated that CEC are established and available. However, utilization is rather low [rarely N = 40 (54.1%), never N = 12, (16.2%), occasionally N = 19 (25.7%)], although it was rated as very helpful. There was a significant correlation between utilization and perceived general usefulness (r = 0.224, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and support (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001); whereas evaluations differed significantly between professional groups (t = −2.298, <i>p</i> = 0.23, Cohen’s d = 0.42). Conclusions: The contradiction between the low utilization despite positive evaluations could be related to perceived hurdles. These and the different perceptions within the professional groups give rise to the consideration of whether alternative approaches, e.g., liaison services, would be preferable in neonatology.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/11/1349neonatologyethicsneonatal intensive care unitethics consultationfield expertise |
| spellingShingle | Pia Göbert Pia von Blanckenburg Rolf F. Maier Carola Seifart Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care Children neonatology ethics neonatal intensive care unit ethics consultation field expertise |
| title | Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care |
| title_full | Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care |
| title_fullStr | Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care |
| title_full_unstemmed | Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care |
| title_short | Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care |
| title_sort | utilization and evaluation of ethics consultation services in neonatal intensive care |
| topic | neonatology ethics neonatal intensive care unit ethics consultation field expertise |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/11/1349 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT piagobert utilizationandevaluationofethicsconsultationservicesinneonatalintensivecare AT piavonblanckenburg utilizationandevaluationofethicsconsultationservicesinneonatalintensivecare AT rolffmaier utilizationandevaluationofethicsconsultationservicesinneonatalintensivecare AT carolaseifart utilizationandevaluationofethicsconsultationservicesinneonatalintensivecare |