Computed tomography-based contrast features for distinguishing extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors from intra-abdominal fibromatosis

PURPOSE: This study aims to define the computed tomography (CT) criteria that distinguish extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGISTs) from intra-abdominal fibromatosis (IAF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on CT images obtained from 31 pathologically confirmed cases, including 17...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lijing Zhang, Yongbo Li, Xinxin Luo, Deqi Li, Linlin Yin, Jiayue Li, Li Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2025-01-01
Series:Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dirjournal.org/articles/computed-tomography-based-contrast-features-for-distinguishing-extra-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumors-from-intra-abdominal-fibromatosis/doi/dir.2024.242800
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSE: This study aims to define the computed tomography (CT) criteria that distinguish extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGISTs) from intra-abdominal fibromatosis (IAF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on CT images obtained from 31 pathologically confirmed cases, including 17 cases of eGISTs and 14 of IAF. Various parameters [e.g., lesion location, contour characteristics, border delineation, enhancement patterns, presence of intralesional necrosis, vessels, air, fat, and hemorrhage, the long diameter (LD), LD/short diameter (SD) ratio, and volume (LD × SD × height diameter)] were meticulously evaluated. In addition, the degree of enhancement during arterial and portal venous phases and the lesion-to-aorta CT attenuation ratio during both phases were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test, the Student’s t-test, and the receiver operating characteristic curve to identify significant CT criteria. Sensitivity and specificity assessments were conducted for single and combined CT criteria. RESULTS: Significant differentiators between eGISTs and IAF include non-mesenteric localization, irregular contour, well-defined borders, heterogeneous enhancement, presence of intralesional necrosis and vessels, and absence of intralesional fat, with LD exceeding 9.6 cm, an LD/SD ratio >1.22, and volume surpassing 603.3 cm3 (P < 0.05). A combination of seven or more of these criteria yielded a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: Ten distinct CT criteria have been identified to distinguish eGISTs from IAF, notably encompassing non-mesenteric localization, irregular contour, well-defined borders, heterogeneous enhancement, presence of intralesional necrosis and vessels, absence of intralesional fat, LD >9.6 cm, an LD/SD ratio >1.22, and volume surpassing 603.3 cm3. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The current findings establish CT criteria to distinguish eGISTs from IAF in a clinical setting.
ISSN:1305-3825
1305-3612