Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundAnticoagulants are the primary means for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but their clinical standardized application still remains controversial. The present study intends to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE.Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weijie Fu, Maolin Zhao, Sheng Ding, Mei Xin, Ke Yang, Li Jiang, Fan Wu, Xiaochen Wu, Jian Wang, Jie Chen, Feng Gao, Siyi He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1519869/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555697603444736
author Weijie Fu
Maolin Zhao
Sheng Ding
Mei Xin
Ke Yang
Li Jiang
Fan Wu
Xiaochen Wu
Jian Wang
Jie Chen
Feng Gao
Siyi He
author_facet Weijie Fu
Maolin Zhao
Sheng Ding
Mei Xin
Ke Yang
Li Jiang
Fan Wu
Xiaochen Wu
Jian Wang
Jie Chen
Feng Gao
Siyi He
author_sort Weijie Fu
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAnticoagulants are the primary means for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but their clinical standardized application still remains controversial. The present study intends to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE.MethodsMedline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from their inception up to August 2023 were searched to compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE. We extracted data on study settings, baseline characteristics, interventions, and outcomes, applying the intention-to-treat principle. Two researchers assessed study bias using the Cochrane tool, resolving disagreements through discussion or third-party adjudication. Network meta-analyses were performed based on Bayesian generalized linear models, and a frequentist framework with multivariate random effects was used to fit the model.ResultsIn terms of treatment, 58 trials with 119,417 patients proved eligible, while 125 trials with 225,414 patients were included in terms of prevention. All anticoagulants were found to reduce the recurrence or incidence of VTE compared with Placebo, of which high-level evidence indicated that direct thrombin inhibitors (TIs) and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were the two most effective drugs. For treatment, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) significantly increased the risk of major bleeding in comparison to Placebo. For prevention, only UFH (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.3) and NOACs (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.6) showed significant increased risks in major bleeding. Additionally, after an exhaustive analysis of NOACs, analysis showed that apixaban (RR 0.5, 95%CI 0.17–1.46) had a superior performance in major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban (RR 3.87, 95%CI 1.48–10.09).ConclusionTIs and NOACs were superior in efficacy with minimal side effects, making them pivotal choices for both prevention and treatment of VTE. Clinical practitioners must carefully weigh drug characteristics, indications, and contraindications to optimize treatment outcomes.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=466775.
format Article
id doaj-art-aedaca44e0bb48f5b8b648d31e909aed
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-aedaca44e0bb48f5b8b648d31e909aed2025-01-08T05:10:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011510.3389/fphar.2024.15198691519869Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsWeijie FuMaolin ZhaoSheng DingMei XinKe YangLi JiangFan WuXiaochen WuJian WangJie ChenFeng GaoSiyi HeBackgroundAnticoagulants are the primary means for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but their clinical standardized application still remains controversial. The present study intends to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE.MethodsMedline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from their inception up to August 2023 were searched to compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE. We extracted data on study settings, baseline characteristics, interventions, and outcomes, applying the intention-to-treat principle. Two researchers assessed study bias using the Cochrane tool, resolving disagreements through discussion or third-party adjudication. Network meta-analyses were performed based on Bayesian generalized linear models, and a frequentist framework with multivariate random effects was used to fit the model.ResultsIn terms of treatment, 58 trials with 119,417 patients proved eligible, while 125 trials with 225,414 patients were included in terms of prevention. All anticoagulants were found to reduce the recurrence or incidence of VTE compared with Placebo, of which high-level evidence indicated that direct thrombin inhibitors (TIs) and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were the two most effective drugs. For treatment, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) significantly increased the risk of major bleeding in comparison to Placebo. For prevention, only UFH (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.3) and NOACs (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.6) showed significant increased risks in major bleeding. Additionally, after an exhaustive analysis of NOACs, analysis showed that apixaban (RR 0.5, 95%CI 0.17–1.46) had a superior performance in major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban (RR 3.87, 95%CI 1.48–10.09).ConclusionTIs and NOACs were superior in efficacy with minimal side effects, making them pivotal choices for both prevention and treatment of VTE. Clinical practitioners must carefully weigh drug characteristics, indications, and contraindications to optimize treatment outcomes.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=466775.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1519869/fullanticoagulantsmeta-analysissystematic reviewvenous thromboembolismnovel oral anticoagulants
spellingShingle Weijie Fu
Maolin Zhao
Sheng Ding
Mei Xin
Ke Yang
Li Jiang
Fan Wu
Xiaochen Wu
Jian Wang
Jie Chen
Feng Gao
Siyi He
Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Frontiers in Pharmacology
anticoagulants
meta-analysis
systematic review
venous thromboembolism
novel oral anticoagulants
title Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of anticoagulants on venous thromboembolism a systematic review and network meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic anticoagulants
meta-analysis
systematic review
venous thromboembolism
novel oral anticoagulants
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1519869/full
work_keys_str_mv AT weijiefu efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT maolinzhao efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shengding efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT meixin efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT keyang efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lijiang efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fanwu efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaochenwu efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jianwang efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jiechen efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fenggao efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT siyihe efficacyandsafetyofanticoagulantsonvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials