Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundMobile phone SMS text message reminders have shown moderate effects in improving participation rates in ongoing colorectal cancer screening programs. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of SMS text messages as a replacement for routine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuria Vives, Gemma Binefa, Noemie Travier, Albert Farre, Jon Aritz Panera, Berta Casas, Carmen Vidal, Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz, Montse Garcia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-01-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e64243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846098656324747264
author Nuria Vives
Gemma Binefa
Noemie Travier
Albert Farre
Jon Aritz Panera
Berta Casas
Carmen Vidal
Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz
Montse Garcia
author_facet Nuria Vives
Gemma Binefa
Noemie Travier
Albert Farre
Jon Aritz Panera
Berta Casas
Carmen Vidal
Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz
Montse Garcia
author_sort Nuria Vives
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMobile phone SMS text message reminders have shown moderate effects in improving participation rates in ongoing colorectal cancer screening programs. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of SMS text messages as a replacement for routine postal reminders in a fecal immunochemical test–based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain. MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial among individuals aged 50 to 69 years who were invited to screening but had not completed their fecal immunochemical test within 6 weeks. The intervention group (n=12,167) received an SMS text message reminder, while the control group (n=12,221) followed the standard procedure of receiving a reminder letter. The primary outcome was participation within 18 weeks of the invitation. The trial was stopped early, and a recovery strategy was implemented for nonparticipants in the intervention group. We performed a final analysis to evaluate the impact of the recovery strategy on the main outcome of the trial. Participation was assessed using a logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders (sex, age, and deprivation score index) globally and by screening behavior. ResultsThe trial was discontinued early in September 2022 due to the results of the interim analysis. The interim analysis included 5570 individuals who had completed 18 weeks of follow-up (intention-to-treat). The SMS text message group had a participation rate of 17.2% (477/2781), whereas the control group had a participation rate of 21.9% (610/2789; odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82; P<.001). As a recovery strategy, 7591 (72.7%) out of 10,442 nonparticipants in the SMS text message group had an open screening episode and received a second reminder by letter, reaching a participation rate of 23% (1748/7591). The final analysis (N=24,388) showed a participation rate of 29.3% (3561/12,167) in the intervention group, which received 2 reminders, while the participation rate was 26.5% (3235/12,221) in the control group (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23; P<.001). ConclusionsReplacing SMS text messages with reminder letters did not increase the participation rate but also led to a decline in participation among nonparticipants 6 weeks after the invitation. However, sending a second reminder by letter significantly increased participation rates among nonparticipants within 6 weeks in the SMS text message group compared with those who received 1 postal reminder (control group). Additional research is essential to determine the best timing and frequency of reminders to boost participation without being intrusive in their choice of participation. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04343950; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04343950
format Article
id doaj-art-aec4a64be0b0465a86043b84395b3f6e
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-5222
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
spelling doaj-art-aec4a64be0b0465a86043b84395b3f6e2025-01-01T16:15:27ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222025-01-0113e6424310.2196/64243Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled TrialNuria Viveshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-6110Gemma Binefahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-0100Noemie Travierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-7769Albert Farrehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6146Jon Aritz Panerahttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-9480-4768Berta Casashttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-9033-4632Carmen Vidalhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-2710Gemma Ibáñez-Sanzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-2073Montse Garciahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-3185 BackgroundMobile phone SMS text message reminders have shown moderate effects in improving participation rates in ongoing colorectal cancer screening programs. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of SMS text messages as a replacement for routine postal reminders in a fecal immunochemical test–based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain. MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial among individuals aged 50 to 69 years who were invited to screening but had not completed their fecal immunochemical test within 6 weeks. The intervention group (n=12,167) received an SMS text message reminder, while the control group (n=12,221) followed the standard procedure of receiving a reminder letter. The primary outcome was participation within 18 weeks of the invitation. The trial was stopped early, and a recovery strategy was implemented for nonparticipants in the intervention group. We performed a final analysis to evaluate the impact of the recovery strategy on the main outcome of the trial. Participation was assessed using a logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders (sex, age, and deprivation score index) globally and by screening behavior. ResultsThe trial was discontinued early in September 2022 due to the results of the interim analysis. The interim analysis included 5570 individuals who had completed 18 weeks of follow-up (intention-to-treat). The SMS text message group had a participation rate of 17.2% (477/2781), whereas the control group had a participation rate of 21.9% (610/2789; odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82; P<.001). As a recovery strategy, 7591 (72.7%) out of 10,442 nonparticipants in the SMS text message group had an open screening episode and received a second reminder by letter, reaching a participation rate of 23% (1748/7591). The final analysis (N=24,388) showed a participation rate of 29.3% (3561/12,167) in the intervention group, which received 2 reminders, while the participation rate was 26.5% (3235/12,221) in the control group (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23; P<.001). ConclusionsReplacing SMS text messages with reminder letters did not increase the participation rate but also led to a decline in participation among nonparticipants 6 weeks after the invitation. However, sending a second reminder by letter significantly increased participation rates among nonparticipants within 6 weeks in the SMS text message group compared with those who received 1 postal reminder (control group). Additional research is essential to determine the best timing and frequency of reminders to boost participation without being intrusive in their choice of participation. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04343950; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04343950https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e64243
spellingShingle Nuria Vives
Gemma Binefa
Noemie Travier
Albert Farre
Jon Aritz Panera
Berta Casas
Carmen Vidal
Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz
Montse Garcia
Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
title Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort text messaging versus postal reminders to improve participation in a colorectal cancer screening program randomized controlled trial
url https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e64243
work_keys_str_mv AT nuriavives textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gemmabinefa textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT noemietravier textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT albertfarre textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jonaritzpanera textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertacasas textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carmenvidal textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gemmaibanezsanz textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT montsegarcia textmessagingversuspostalreminderstoimproveparticipationinacolorectalcancerscreeningprogramrandomizedcontrolledtrial