NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW

Technology has helped improve many aspects of the quality of publications: more visibility, greater access to sources of information and option to verify those sources, among others. This has meant that some journals have had to adjust their processes, especially peer reviewing. The blind mode is th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrea Mora-Campos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Costa Rica 2015-07-01
Series:Pensar en Movimiento
Online Access:http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/19942
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563868685402112
author Andrea Mora-Campos
author_facet Andrea Mora-Campos
author_sort Andrea Mora-Campos
collection DOAJ
description Technology has helped improve many aspects of the quality of publications: more visibility, greater access to sources of information and option to verify those sources, among others. This has meant that some journals have had to adjust their processes, especially peer reviewing. The blind mode is the method most commonly used by journals. In the case of our journal, we have traditionally used the double-blind style; however, we have noticed that, with advanced Internet, social networks, and media, it is easier for reviewers to obtain previews, preprints, primary research or previous articles that can help identify the author, thus making the double blind review difficult. These experiences have made us analyze whether the peer review system used by the journal is appropriate. Searching for other peer review options we found the open review. This paper briefly reviews some advantages and disadvantages of this type of review and the experience faced by this journal when implementing it.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae801852b0a3412dad4a7584288ee25d
institution Kabale University
issn 1409-0724
1659-4436
language English
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
record_format Article
series Pensar en Movimiento
spelling doaj-art-ae801852b0a3412dad4a7584288ee25d2025-01-02T23:31:17ZengUniversidad de Costa RicaPensar en Movimiento1409-07241659-44362015-07-011311410.15517/pensarmov.v13i1.1994218110NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEWAndrea Mora-Campos0Universidad de Costa RicaTechnology has helped improve many aspects of the quality of publications: more visibility, greater access to sources of information and option to verify those sources, among others. This has meant that some journals have had to adjust their processes, especially peer reviewing. The blind mode is the method most commonly used by journals. In the case of our journal, we have traditionally used the double-blind style; however, we have noticed that, with advanced Internet, social networks, and media, it is easier for reviewers to obtain previews, preprints, primary research or previous articles that can help identify the author, thus making the double blind review difficult. These experiences have made us analyze whether the peer review system used by the journal is appropriate. Searching for other peer review options we found the open review. This paper briefly reviews some advantages and disadvantages of this type of review and the experience faced by this journal when implementing it.http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/19942
spellingShingle Andrea Mora-Campos
NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
Pensar en Movimiento
title NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
title_full NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
title_fullStr NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
title_short NEW WAYS OF PEER REVIEWING IN JOURNALS: OPEN REVIEW
title_sort new ways of peer reviewing in journals open review
url http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/pem/article/view/19942
work_keys_str_mv AT andreamoracampos newwaysofpeerreviewinginjournalsopenreview