Evaluating an early Interdisciplinary Multimodal Assessment for Patients at Risk of Developing Chronic Pain: Results of a Multicentre RCT in Germany
Abstract Introduction Patients at risk of developing chronic pain are often significantly impaired in their daily, social and work activities. An early interdisciplinary multimodal assessment (IMA) includes a systematically integrated view of medical, psychosocial and functional factors to direct pa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Adis, Springer Healthcare
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Pain and Therapy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00729-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Introduction Patients at risk of developing chronic pain are often significantly impaired in their daily, social and work activities. An early interdisciplinary multimodal assessment (IMA) includes a systematically integrated view of medical, psychosocial and functional factors to direct patients to need-based treatment services. This multicentre, randomised, controlled trial examined the effects of an IMA on preventing chronic pain and improving care for adult patients. Methods The intervention group (IG) received an IMA in accordance with standardised guidelines. The control group (CG) was offered a unimodal medical pain assessment (MPA). Data from the Characteristic Pain Intensity (PI) and Disability Score (DS), as primary outcomes, were collected at assessment and 3 and 6 months later together with secondary outcomes (e.g. depression, anxiety, stress, catastrophizing, health-related quality of life). Results A total of 620 (68.4%) valid questionnaires were available at the 6-month follow-up. The mean reduction (numerical rating scale, 0–10) in terms of improvement within both groups (IG/CG) was 1.6/1.7 points for PI and 1.9/1.8 points for DS. Most secondary outcomes improved as well. However, the differences between the two groups did not reach statistical significance, although there was a tendency for the IG to have a greater effect on some psychological outcomes. Regarding the recommended treatment approaches, the focus in the IG was more on physical activity and psychological and psychosomatic interventions, whereas in the CG there was also a preference for adjusting the medication. Conclusions Both early MPA and IMA seem to have a positive effect on outcomes such as pain intensity, functional limitations and psychological factors for patients at risk of developing chronic pain. We critically reflect on the results of the primary research question by discussing the limitations in detail and conclude that further research should ensure that the control conditions reflect standard care and that the follow-up period is long enough. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00015443). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2193-8237 2193-651X |