Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition
For more than 40 years, Robert Dahl’s theory of polyarchy democracy has been considered by scholars as one of the most effective, robust, and enlightening forms of contemporary revisionist democratic theory. The English version of this book was published in 1971 and its translation was published in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6741_7417f954d65bbabe402ed65f1f978bcb.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555336302952448 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammad Zohdi Goharpour Fatemeh Sayadi Rasoul Afzali |
| author_facet | Mohammad Zohdi Goharpour Fatemeh Sayadi Rasoul Afzali |
| author_sort | Mohammad Zohdi Goharpour |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For more than 40 years, Robert Dahl’s theory of polyarchy democracy has been considered by scholars as one of the most effective, robust, and enlightening forms of contemporary revisionist democratic theory. The English version of this book was published in 1971 and its translation was published in 2018. Polyarchy is defined as a set of institutional arrangements that allow for public opposition and inclusive participation in politics. The central assumption of the sign in this book, which involves a linear process, is that when hegemonic systems and competitive dictatorships move toward multiculturalism, opportunities for effective participation and questioning increase. Therefore, the number of individuals, groups, and interests whose policy priorities are considered increases. In this article, an attempt is made to examine the intellectual background and studies of Robert Dahl over two decades (1970-1950) and to identify the roots of the development of his theory of polyarchy democracy, presented in the form of an independent book, in his earlier works. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-adb6c0e15a754f9bbe97eb519c12f613 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-adb6c0e15a754f9bbe97eb519c12f6132025-01-08T05:42:25ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502021-08-0121614516410.30465/crtls.2021.33034.19826741Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and OppositionMohammad Zohdi Goharpour0Fatemeh Sayadi1Rasoul Afzali2PhD in Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranMA Student of Political Geography, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor of Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranFor more than 40 years, Robert Dahl’s theory of polyarchy democracy has been considered by scholars as one of the most effective, robust, and enlightening forms of contemporary revisionist democratic theory. The English version of this book was published in 1971 and its translation was published in 2018. Polyarchy is defined as a set of institutional arrangements that allow for public opposition and inclusive participation in politics. The central assumption of the sign in this book, which involves a linear process, is that when hegemonic systems and competitive dictatorships move toward multiculturalism, opportunities for effective participation and questioning increase. Therefore, the number of individuals, groups, and interests whose policy priorities are considered increases. In this article, an attempt is made to examine the intellectual background and studies of Robert Dahl over two decades (1970-1950) and to identify the roots of the development of his theory of polyarchy democracy, presented in the form of an independent book, in his earlier works.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6741_7417f954d65bbabe402ed65f1f978bcb.pdfrobert dahltheorizingdemocracyparticipationquestioningpolyarchy |
| spellingShingle | Mohammad Zohdi Goharpour Fatemeh Sayadi Rasoul Afzali Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی robert dahl theorizing democracy participation questioning polyarchy |
| title | Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition |
| title_full | Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition |
| title_fullStr | Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition |
| title_full_unstemmed | Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition |
| title_short | Polyarchy: The Transition from Democratic Passivity to Democratic Participation A Critique on the Translation Book Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition |
| title_sort | polyarchy the transition from democratic passivity to democratic participation a critique on the translation book polyarchy participation and opposition |
| topic | robert dahl theorizing democracy participation questioning polyarchy |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6741_7417f954d65bbabe402ed65f1f978bcb.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadzohdigoharpour polyarchythetransitionfromdemocraticpassivitytodemocraticparticipationacritiqueonthetranslationbookpolyarchyparticipationandopposition AT fatemehsayadi polyarchythetransitionfromdemocraticpassivitytodemocraticparticipationacritiqueonthetranslationbookpolyarchyparticipationandopposition AT rasoulafzali polyarchythetransitionfromdemocraticpassivitytodemocraticparticipationacritiqueonthetranslationbookpolyarchyparticipationandopposition |