Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients

Abstract Background The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a key tool for assessing the quality of palliative care using patient-reported outcomes. This study aimed to culturally adapt and translate the IPOS to Korean and verify its psychometric properties for use in palliative care...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: So-Jung Park, Yujin Park, Mira Han, Sun-Hyun Kim, In Cheol Hwang, Go-un Woo, Yoo Jeong Lee, Young Sung Kim, Hyun Jung Jho, Yoon Jung Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Palliative Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01630-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846100850974392320
author So-Jung Park
Yujin Park
Mira Han
Sun-Hyun Kim
In Cheol Hwang
Go-un Woo
Yoo Jeong Lee
Young Sung Kim
Hyun Jung Jho
Yoon Jung Chang
author_facet So-Jung Park
Yujin Park
Mira Han
Sun-Hyun Kim
In Cheol Hwang
Go-un Woo
Yoo Jeong Lee
Young Sung Kim
Hyun Jung Jho
Yoon Jung Chang
author_sort So-Jung Park
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a key tool for assessing the quality of palliative care using patient-reported outcomes. This study aimed to culturally adapt and translate the IPOS to Korean and verify its psychometric properties for use in palliative care settings. Methods The IPOS was translated and culturally adapted, followed by validation in 119 terminally ill cancer patients and 28 healthcare providers across six Hospice and Palliative Care Units from September 2023 to January 2024. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the IPOS items and the corresponding EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the corresponding FACIT-Sp-12. Results The Korean IPOS demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.74 for patients and 0.81 for staff. The test-retest reliability showed moderate-to-good stability, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.722 for the IPOS total score. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate correlations with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12). Known-group validity was demonstrated by significant differences in the IPOS scores across Phase of Illness. Conclusion The Korean IPOS is reliable and valid for assessing palliative care outcomes. This validation supports its use in clinical practice and research and provides a robust framework for evaluating and improving palliative care delivery in Korea.
format Article
id doaj-art-ad55bbda272c46d0a236233520f0dbbd
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-684X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Palliative Care
spelling doaj-art-ad55bbda272c46d0a236233520f0dbbd2024-12-29T12:52:16ZengBMCBMC Palliative Care1472-684X2024-12-0123111010.1186/s12904-024-01630-0Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patientsSo-Jung Park0Yujin Park1Mira Han2Sun-Hyun Kim3In Cheol Hwang4Go-un Woo5Yoo Jeong Lee6Young Sung Kim7Hyun Jung Jho8Yoon Jung Chang9Department of Hospice and Palliative Service, National Cancer CenterHealthcare Data Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Boramae Medical CenterDepartment of Family Medicine, International St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong UniversityDepartment of Family Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Medical CenterDepartment of Family Medicine, Korea University Guro HospitalDepartment of Family Medicine, National Health Insurance Medical CenterDepartment of Hospice and Palliative Service, National Cancer CenterNational Cancer Survivorship Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer CenterAbstract Background The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a key tool for assessing the quality of palliative care using patient-reported outcomes. This study aimed to culturally adapt and translate the IPOS to Korean and verify its psychometric properties for use in palliative care settings. Methods The IPOS was translated and culturally adapted, followed by validation in 119 terminally ill cancer patients and 28 healthcare providers across six Hospice and Palliative Care Units from September 2023 to January 2024. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the IPOS items and the corresponding EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the corresponding FACIT-Sp-12. Results The Korean IPOS demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.74 for patients and 0.81 for staff. The test-retest reliability showed moderate-to-good stability, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.722 for the IPOS total score. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate correlations with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12). Known-group validity was demonstrated by significant differences in the IPOS scores across Phase of Illness. Conclusion The Korean IPOS is reliable and valid for assessing palliative care outcomes. This validation supports its use in clinical practice and research and provides a robust framework for evaluating and improving palliative care delivery in Korea.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01630-0Palliative carePatient-reported outcome measuresIntegrated Palliative care Outcome ScaleReliabilityValidityPsychometrics
spellingShingle So-Jung Park
Yujin Park
Mira Han
Sun-Hyun Kim
In Cheol Hwang
Go-un Woo
Yoo Jeong Lee
Young Sung Kim
Hyun Jung Jho
Yoon Jung Chang
Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative care
Patient-reported outcome measures
Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale
Reliability
Validity
Psychometrics
title Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
title_full Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
title_short Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS) in Korea: a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
title_sort validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale ipos in korea a multicenter study of terminally ill cancer patients
topic Palliative care
Patient-reported outcome measures
Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale
Reliability
Validity
Psychometrics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01630-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sojungpark validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT yujinpark validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT mirahan validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT sunhyunkim validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT incheolhwang validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT gounwoo validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT yoojeonglee validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT youngsungkim validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT hyunjungjho validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients
AT yoonjungchang validityandreliabilityoftheintegratedpalliativecareoutcomescaleiposinkoreaamulticenterstudyofterminallyillcancerpatients