Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players
ABSTRACTResearch related to arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much forearm exposed to physical load is affected by this stress has been studies less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density of dominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral de...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Selcuk University Press
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/811064 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841564414075994112 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Şakir Akgül Arzu Altunel Veli Volkan Gürses Bilgehan Baydil |
| author_facet | Mustafa Şakir Akgül Arzu Altunel Veli Volkan Gürses Bilgehan Baydil |
| author_sort | Mustafa Şakir Akgül |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACTResearch related to
arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much
forearm exposed to physical load is affected by this stress has been studies
less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density of
dominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral density of badminton players who
have been regularly playing badminton for 10 years. 12 male badminton players
whose dominant arms were the same voluntarily participated in this study. Bone
Mineral Density (BMD) of the players was evaluated with Dual X Ray
Absorptiometry (DEXA). Data was evaluated with SPSS 23. Controlled research
method was used to estimate BMD of the players. Differences between dominant
and non-dominant arms were assessed with a non-parametric test, Wilcoxon Signed
Rank Test. P value was set at p lt;0.05. Significant difference was found between
BMD of dominant right ultra-distal part and BMD of non-dominant left
ultra-distal part (z:-2,94, sig:0,00) and between BMD of dominant right
proximal part and BMD of non-dominant
left proximal part (z:-2,09, sig:0,03). There was no significant difference
between dominant proximal 1/3 part and non-dominant proximal 1/3 part (z:1,85,
sig:0,06). As a result, long-term badminton training has positive effects on
BMD. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ad43b4e3eaa641be9e5fdfd23ef8df69 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2147-5652 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Selcuk University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj-art-ad43b4e3eaa641be9e5fdfd23ef8df692025-01-02T22:46:06ZengSelcuk University PressTürk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi2147-56522019-09-0121233734010.15314/tsed.587100154Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton PlayersMustafa Şakir Akgül0Arzu Altunel1Veli Volkan Gürses2Bilgehan BaydilKASTAMONU UNIVERSITYKASTAMONU UNIVERSITYKASTAMONU UNIVERSITYABSTRACTResearch related to arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much forearm exposed to physical load is affected by this stress has been studies less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density of dominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral density of badminton players who have been regularly playing badminton for 10 years. 12 male badminton players whose dominant arms were the same voluntarily participated in this study. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the players was evaluated with Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Data was evaluated with SPSS 23. Controlled research method was used to estimate BMD of the players. Differences between dominant and non-dominant arms were assessed with a non-parametric test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. P value was set at p lt;0.05. Significant difference was found between BMD of dominant right ultra-distal part and BMD of non-dominant left ultra-distal part (z:-2,94, sig:0,00) and between BMD of dominant right proximal part and BMD of non-dominant left proximal part (z:-2,09, sig:0,03). There was no significant difference between dominant proximal 1/3 part and non-dominant proximal 1/3 part (z:1,85, sig:0,06). As a result, long-term badminton training has positive effects on BMD.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/811064badmintonbone mineral density |
| spellingShingle | Mustafa Şakir Akgül Arzu Altunel Veli Volkan Gürses Bilgehan Baydil Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi badminton bone mineral density |
| title | Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players |
| title_full | Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players |
| title_short | Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players |
| title_sort | comparison of bone mineral density of dominant and non dominant forearm of badminton players |
| topic | badminton bone mineral density |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/811064 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafasakirakgul comparisonofbonemineraldensityofdominantandnondominantforearmofbadmintonplayers AT arzualtunel comparisonofbonemineraldensityofdominantandnondominantforearmofbadmintonplayers AT velivolkangurses comparisonofbonemineraldensityofdominantandnondominantforearmofbadmintonplayers AT bilgehanbaydil comparisonofbonemineraldensityofdominantandnondominantforearmofbadmintonplayers |