Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation

Background: The organ injury scale (OIS) for liver trauma by the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) was last updated in 2018 with new “imaging criteria” that continued to grade juxtahepatic venous (JHV) injuries, regardless of presence or absence of active bleeding, as Grade V. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijayan Purushothaman, Kirthi Sathyakumar, Vignesh Kumar, Srujan Lam Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_23_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841548787511721984
author Vijayan Purushothaman
Kirthi Sathyakumar
Vignesh Kumar
Srujan Lam Sharma
author_facet Vijayan Purushothaman
Kirthi Sathyakumar
Vignesh Kumar
Srujan Lam Sharma
author_sort Vijayan Purushothaman
collection DOAJ
description Background: The organ injury scale (OIS) for liver trauma by the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) was last updated in 2018 with new “imaging criteria” that continued to grade juxtahepatic venous (JHV) injuries, regardless of presence or absence of active bleeding, as Grade V. We hypothesized that JHV injury found on imaging, in the absence of active bleeding, should not be considered Grade V based on location alone. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients classified as AAST-OIS Grade V liver injuries based purely on JHV location, with patients who had AAST-OIS Grade I–III liver injuries. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 121 patients with liver injury from the TReCS database (June 2020–May 2023) was conducted. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced dual-phase computed tomography scans on admission were reviewed by both radiologists and surgeons. Patients diagnosed with JHV injuries (JHV – with no contrast extravasation [CE]) and patients with low-grade injuries (OIS I–III) were compared for baseline data on age, gender, injury severity score (ISS) scoring, injury mechanism, length of hospital stay, and liver-related complications. Results: Of 121 patients identified, 66 had Grade I–III injuries and 21 had Grade V injuries due to JHV location alone. Three of the latter group had CE and were excluded. Heterogeneity was compared between the two groups for age (P = 0.634), gender (P = 0.964), mechanisms (P = 0.346), and ISS (P = 0.068). The median length of stay for the JHV (with no CE) group was 4.5 days and 6.00 days for the OIS Grade I–III group (P = 0.233). One patient in the JHV group had hemobilia, and there were no other liver-related complications in the cohort. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the “imaging” criterion of “JHV” injuries, in the absence of extravasation or significant disruption, may be safely revised to a lower grade on the AAST-OIS for liver injuries.
format Article
id doaj-art-abf515a784a34cde8c47c1fc3766b018
institution Kabale University
issn 2542-6273
2455-3069
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
spelling doaj-art-abf515a784a34cde8c47c1fc3766b0182025-01-10T14:02:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine2542-62732455-30692024-12-0110217217610.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_23_24Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasationVijayan PurushothamanKirthi SathyakumarVignesh KumarSrujan Lam SharmaBackground: The organ injury scale (OIS) for liver trauma by the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) was last updated in 2018 with new “imaging criteria” that continued to grade juxtahepatic venous (JHV) injuries, regardless of presence or absence of active bleeding, as Grade V. We hypothesized that JHV injury found on imaging, in the absence of active bleeding, should not be considered Grade V based on location alone. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients classified as AAST-OIS Grade V liver injuries based purely on JHV location, with patients who had AAST-OIS Grade I–III liver injuries. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 121 patients with liver injury from the TReCS database (June 2020–May 2023) was conducted. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced dual-phase computed tomography scans on admission were reviewed by both radiologists and surgeons. Patients diagnosed with JHV injuries (JHV – with no contrast extravasation [CE]) and patients with low-grade injuries (OIS I–III) were compared for baseline data on age, gender, injury severity score (ISS) scoring, injury mechanism, length of hospital stay, and liver-related complications. Results: Of 121 patients identified, 66 had Grade I–III injuries and 21 had Grade V injuries due to JHV location alone. Three of the latter group had CE and were excluded. Heterogeneity was compared between the two groups for age (P = 0.634), gender (P = 0.964), mechanisms (P = 0.346), and ISS (P = 0.068). The median length of stay for the JHV (with no CE) group was 4.5 days and 6.00 days for the OIS Grade I–III group (P = 0.233). One patient in the JHV group had hemobilia, and there were no other liver-related complications in the cohort. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the “imaging” criterion of “JHV” injuries, in the absence of extravasation or significant disruption, may be safely revised to a lower grade on the AAST-OIS for liver injuries.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_23_24contrast extravasationjuxtavenous hepatic injuriessevere liver injury
spellingShingle Vijayan Purushothaman
Kirthi Sathyakumar
Vignesh Kumar
Srujan Lam Sharma
Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
contrast extravasation
juxtavenous hepatic injuries
severe liver injury
title Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
title_full Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
title_fullStr Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
title_full_unstemmed Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
title_short Juxtahepatic venous injuries are not AAST Grade V injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
title_sort juxtahepatic venous injuries are not aast grade v injuries if there is no contrast extravasation
topic contrast extravasation
juxtavenous hepatic injuries
severe liver injury
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_23_24
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayanpurushothaman juxtahepaticvenousinjuriesarenotaastgradevinjuriesifthereisnocontrastextravasation
AT kirthisathyakumar juxtahepaticvenousinjuriesarenotaastgradevinjuriesifthereisnocontrastextravasation
AT vigneshkumar juxtahepaticvenousinjuriesarenotaastgradevinjuriesifthereisnocontrastextravasation
AT srujanlamsharma juxtahepaticvenousinjuriesarenotaastgradevinjuriesifthereisnocontrastextravasation