Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: To investigate the effect of deferred timing of therapeutic extraction on the rate of space closure during en masse anterior retraction. Methods: Twenty-six patients (aged 16-24 years) with bimaxillary protrusion, crowding <3 mm, requiring bilateral extraction of four first premolars...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devi Priya, Shobha Sundareswaran, Navnita Mishra, SreehariSathyanathan, Mohammed Shibin, Baby Jisha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2024-12-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://turkjorthod.org/articles/timing-of-therapeutic-extractions-can-affect-en-masse-anterior-retraction-a-split-mouth-randomized-clinical-trial/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556300015599616
author Devi Priya
Shobha Sundareswaran
Navnita Mishra
SreehariSathyanathan
Mohammed Shibin
Baby Jisha
author_facet Devi Priya
Shobha Sundareswaran
Navnita Mishra
SreehariSathyanathan
Mohammed Shibin
Baby Jisha
author_sort Devi Priya
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To investigate the effect of deferred timing of therapeutic extraction on the rate of space closure during en masse anterior retraction. Methods: Twenty-six patients (aged 16-24 years) with bimaxillary protrusion, crowding <3 mm, requiring bilateral extraction of four first premolars were recruited. Permuted block randomization was done. Allocations were concealed in opaque envelopes which were numbered and sealed. Each patient’s right and left quadrant was randomly assigned for premolar extraction. The extraction of the contralateral side was deferred until the commencement of retraction. The primary outcome was the rate of space closure, and the secondary outcomes were anchorage loss and canine rotation. Blinding was applied only during the outcome assessment. The independent t-test and Intraclass correlation tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the study. The mean rate of space closure over a period of 4 months was found to be significantly higher for the recently extracted site (0.818±0.208) when compared with healed site(0.426±0.184)(p<0.001). The tipping of the canine was also significantly higher for the former (6.042°±1.398°) than the latter (5.125°±1.035°) (p<0.05). However, the amounts of anchorage loss and canine rotation were insignificant. No adverse effects were noted. Conclusion: The rate of space closure at the recent extraction site was faster than that at the healed site. There was no significant difference in the mesial movement of anchorage molars or rotation of canines into the extraction site. The tipping of canines was significantly greater in the recent extracted quadrant. The results of this trial indicate a clinical recommendation to initiate orthodontic retraction immediately following therapeutic extractions and offer a practical, non-invasive, safe procedure for increasing the rate of tooth movement.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab4d7023f96f4646b7c612ce7116e8ed
institution Kabale University
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj-art-ab4d7023f96f4646b7c612ce7116e8ed2025-01-07T10:19:10ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052024-12-0137421322010.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.6Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical TrialDevi Priya0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1778-5583Shobha Sundareswaran1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-5871Navnita Mishra2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-4486SreehariSathyanathan3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9492-1342Mohammed Shibin4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-9306Baby Jisha5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-929XGovernment Dental College, Kozhikode, Faculty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kerala, IndiaKMCT Dental College, Department of Orthodontics, Kozhikode, IndiaGovernment Dental College, Kozhikode, Faculty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kerala, IndiaGovernment Dental College, Kozhikode, Faculty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kerala, IndiaGovernment Dental College, Kozhikode, Faculty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kerala, IndiaGovernment Dental College, Kozhikode, Faculty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kerala, IndiaObjective: To investigate the effect of deferred timing of therapeutic extraction on the rate of space closure during en masse anterior retraction. Methods: Twenty-six patients (aged 16-24 years) with bimaxillary protrusion, crowding <3 mm, requiring bilateral extraction of four first premolars were recruited. Permuted block randomization was done. Allocations were concealed in opaque envelopes which were numbered and sealed. Each patient’s right and left quadrant was randomly assigned for premolar extraction. The extraction of the contralateral side was deferred until the commencement of retraction. The primary outcome was the rate of space closure, and the secondary outcomes were anchorage loss and canine rotation. Blinding was applied only during the outcome assessment. The independent t-test and Intraclass correlation tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the study. The mean rate of space closure over a period of 4 months was found to be significantly higher for the recently extracted site (0.818±0.208) when compared with healed site(0.426±0.184)(p<0.001). The tipping of the canine was also significantly higher for the former (6.042°±1.398°) than the latter (5.125°±1.035°) (p<0.05). However, the amounts of anchorage loss and canine rotation were insignificant. No adverse effects were noted. Conclusion: The rate of space closure at the recent extraction site was faster than that at the healed site. There was no significant difference in the mesial movement of anchorage molars or rotation of canines into the extraction site. The tipping of canines was significantly greater in the recent extracted quadrant. The results of this trial indicate a clinical recommendation to initiate orthodontic retraction immediately following therapeutic extractions and offer a practical, non-invasive, safe procedure for increasing the rate of tooth movement.https://turkjorthod.org/articles/timing-of-therapeutic-extractions-can-affect-en-masse-anterior-retraction-a-split-mouth-randomized-clinical-trial/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.6accelerated tooth movementregional acceleratory phenomenonrate of space closurerecently extracted sitehealed site
spellingShingle Devi Priya
Shobha Sundareswaran
Navnita Mishra
SreehariSathyanathan
Mohammed Shibin
Baby Jisha
Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
accelerated tooth movement
regional acceleratory phenomenon
rate of space closure
recently extracted site
healed site
title Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort timing of therapeutic extractions can affect en masse anterior retraction a split mouth randomized clinical trial
topic accelerated tooth movement
regional acceleratory phenomenon
rate of space closure
recently extracted site
healed site
url https://turkjorthod.org/articles/timing-of-therapeutic-extractions-can-affect-en-masse-anterior-retraction-a-split-mouth-randomized-clinical-trial/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.6
work_keys_str_mv AT devipriya timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shobhasundareswaran timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT navnitamishra timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sreeharisathyanathan timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohammedshibin timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT babyjisha timingoftherapeuticextractionscanaffectenmasseanteriorretractionasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial