The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundRadiomics has emerged as a promising approach for diagnosing, treating, and evaluating the prognosis of various diseases in recent years. Some investigators have utilized radiomics to create preoperative diagnostic models for tumor deposits (TDs) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuewu Liu, Feng Lin, Danni Li, Nan Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1425665/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555696477274112
author Xuewu Liu
Feng Lin
Danni Li
Nan Lei
author_facet Xuewu Liu
Feng Lin
Danni Li
Nan Lei
author_sort Xuewu Liu
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundRadiomics has emerged as a promising approach for diagnosing, treating, and evaluating the prognosis of various diseases in recent years. Some investigators have utilized radiomics to create preoperative diagnostic models for tumor deposits (TDs) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer (RC). However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive, evidence-based support for the diagnostic performance of these models. Thus, the accuracy of radiomic models was assessed in diagnosing preoperative RC TDs and PNI in this study.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles from their establishment up to December 11, 2023. The radiomics quality score (RQS) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the methodological quality and research level of the included studies.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 15 eligible studies, most of which employed logistic regression models (LRMs). For diagnosing TDs, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on radiomic features (RFs) alone were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79 - 0.90), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.89); in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.91), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.72 - 0.99), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.76), respectively. For diagnosing PNI, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on RFs alone were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44 - 0.80), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.87) in the validation set; in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.89), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48 - 0.71), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84 - 0.94), respectively.ConclusionsDiagnostic models based on both RFs and CFs have proven effective in preoperatively diagnosing TDs and PNI in RC. This non-invasive method shows promise as a new approach.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=498660, identifier CRD42024498660.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab1a45fe07b34670b3040d7eab063e0f
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-ab1a45fe07b34670b3040d7eab063e0f2025-01-08T05:10:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011410.3389/fonc.2024.14256651425665The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisXuewu LiuFeng LinDanni LiNan LeiBackgroundRadiomics has emerged as a promising approach for diagnosing, treating, and evaluating the prognosis of various diseases in recent years. Some investigators have utilized radiomics to create preoperative diagnostic models for tumor deposits (TDs) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer (RC). However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive, evidence-based support for the diagnostic performance of these models. Thus, the accuracy of radiomic models was assessed in diagnosing preoperative RC TDs and PNI in this study.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles from their establishment up to December 11, 2023. The radiomics quality score (RQS) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the methodological quality and research level of the included studies.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 15 eligible studies, most of which employed logistic regression models (LRMs). For diagnosing TDs, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on radiomic features (RFs) alone were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79 - 0.90), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.89); in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.91), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.72 - 0.99), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.76), respectively. For diagnosing PNI, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on RFs alone were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44 - 0.80), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.87) in the validation set; in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.89), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48 - 0.71), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84 - 0.94), respectively.ConclusionsDiagnostic models based on both RFs and CFs have proven effective in preoperatively diagnosing TDs and PNI in RC. This non-invasive method shows promise as a new approach.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=498660, identifier CRD42024498660.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1425665/fullmachine learningrectal cancerperineural invasiontumor depositssystematic reviewmeta-analysis
spellingShingle Xuewu Liu
Feng Lin
Danni Li
Nan Lei
The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Oncology
machine learning
rectal cancer
perineural invasion
tumor deposits
systematic review
meta-analysis
title The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer a systematic review and meta analysis
topic machine learning
rectal cancer
perineural invasion
tumor deposits
systematic review
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1425665/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xuewuliu theaccuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fenglin theaccuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dannili theaccuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nanlei theaccuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuewuliu accuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fenglin accuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dannili accuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nanlei accuracyofradiomicsindiagnosingtumordepositsandperineuralinvasioninrectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis