Blame attribution and intentionality perception of human versus robot drivers: Implications for judgments about autonomous vehicles in moral dilemma contexts
Existing research has examined people’s judgments concerning moral dilemmas involving non-human driving agents (i.e. an autonomous vehicle, abbr. AV). However, more evidence is needed to clarify the underlying cognitive mechanism accounting for the differential attribution of blame between non-human...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Yinuo Mu, Minoru Karasawa |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311908.2024.2384298 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Wrongness and Blame Judgments and Their Dynamics: Toward a Three-Input Processing Model of Moral Judgment
by: Aurore Gaboriaud, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Acceptability and emotional states in moral dilemmas across sex: a cross-cultural analysis
by: Aline Ponzoni, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
The impact of moral judgment on bystanders’ interpersonal trust: the mediating role of trustworthiness
by: Zhen Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Psychometric properties of the persian version of the moral orientation guilt scale in the general population
by: Nematollah Yarollahi, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
The role of Dilemmas in law
by: Azevedo Sara
Published: (2024-01-01)