The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy

Abstract Background Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies (FAs) but carries the risk of anaphylactic reaction. Stepwise OFC, starting with a low dose of allergen and progressing to medium and full doses, is effective in determining a tolerable dose. We retrospe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mika Ogata, Jun Kido, Takanobu Yoshida, Natsuko Nishi, Sachiko Shimomura, Nami Hirai, Tomoyuki Mizukami, Masaaki Yanai, Kimitoshi Nakamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112510009147392
author Mika Ogata
Jun Kido
Takanobu Yoshida
Natsuko Nishi
Sachiko Shimomura
Nami Hirai
Tomoyuki Mizukami
Masaaki Yanai
Kimitoshi Nakamura
author_facet Mika Ogata
Jun Kido
Takanobu Yoshida
Natsuko Nishi
Sachiko Shimomura
Nami Hirai
Tomoyuki Mizukami
Masaaki Yanai
Kimitoshi Nakamura
author_sort Mika Ogata
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies (FAs) but carries the risk of anaphylactic reaction. Stepwise OFC, starting with a low dose of allergen and progressing to medium and full doses, is effective in determining a tolerable dose. We retrospectively evaluated the results of a stepwise OFC for hen’s egg (HE) to demonstrate its safety and efficacy. We discuss whether early low-dose administration of HE induces early immune tolerance in HE allergy. Methods We included 2,058 children (median, 2.6 years) who underwent HE-OFC between 2017 and 2021 at two institutes in Japan. The target challenge dose of OFC was classified as low (less than 1/8 of a cooked egg), medium (1/8 or more but less than 1/2), or full (1/2 or more). If the low-dose OFC was negative, subjects were allowed to consume the same dose of HE and underwent medium-dose OFC within 12 months. Even if positive, individuals were recommended to consume previously-tolerated amounts of HE and repeat OFC at the same dose within 12 months. We evaluated the correlation between their OFC results and response. Results A total of 526 (25.6%) children presented positive reactions. There were no cases of anaphylactic shock. Higher serum egg white (EW)- (P < 0.001) and ovomucoid (OVM)- specific IgE (P < 0.001) (sIgE) levels were associated with positive OFC. The low-dose OFC group had more positive reactions (P < 0.001), younger children (P < 0.001), higher EW-sIgE (P < 0.001) and OVM-sIgE (P < 0.001), and more histories of anaphylaxis (P = 0.014). OFC-positive children were younger than OFC-negative children, particularly in low-dose OFC (P = 0.010). OFC results between complete and partial elimination of HE groups across all EW- or OVM-sIgE classes were similar (P > 0.05). Conclusions Stepwise OFC is safe and effective in diagnosing HE allergy and facilitates the earlier introduction of HE in children. This study suggests the limited potential of early consumption of lower doses of HE to induce earlier immune tolerance, such that other strategies to induce earlier tolerance in infants with HE allergy should be considered.
format Article
id doaj-art-aac2f6abd0aa4e4797f5a97f62871bd6
institution Kabale University
issn 1710-1492
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
spelling doaj-art-aac2f6abd0aa4e4797f5a97f62871bd62024-12-22T12:31:57ZengBMCAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology1710-14922024-12-012011910.1186/s13223-024-00941-4The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergyMika Ogata0Jun Kido1Takanobu Yoshida2Natsuko Nishi3Sachiko Shimomura4Nami Hirai5Tomoyuki Mizukami6Masaaki Yanai7Kimitoshi Nakamura8Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Kumamoto Regional Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, Kumamoto Regional Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, Kumamoto Regional Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityAbstract Background Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies (FAs) but carries the risk of anaphylactic reaction. Stepwise OFC, starting with a low dose of allergen and progressing to medium and full doses, is effective in determining a tolerable dose. We retrospectively evaluated the results of a stepwise OFC for hen’s egg (HE) to demonstrate its safety and efficacy. We discuss whether early low-dose administration of HE induces early immune tolerance in HE allergy. Methods We included 2,058 children (median, 2.6 years) who underwent HE-OFC between 2017 and 2021 at two institutes in Japan. The target challenge dose of OFC was classified as low (less than 1/8 of a cooked egg), medium (1/8 or more but less than 1/2), or full (1/2 or more). If the low-dose OFC was negative, subjects were allowed to consume the same dose of HE and underwent medium-dose OFC within 12 months. Even if positive, individuals were recommended to consume previously-tolerated amounts of HE and repeat OFC at the same dose within 12 months. We evaluated the correlation between their OFC results and response. Results A total of 526 (25.6%) children presented positive reactions. There were no cases of anaphylactic shock. Higher serum egg white (EW)- (P < 0.001) and ovomucoid (OVM)- specific IgE (P < 0.001) (sIgE) levels were associated with positive OFC. The low-dose OFC group had more positive reactions (P < 0.001), younger children (P < 0.001), higher EW-sIgE (P < 0.001) and OVM-sIgE (P < 0.001), and more histories of anaphylaxis (P = 0.014). OFC-positive children were younger than OFC-negative children, particularly in low-dose OFC (P = 0.010). OFC results between complete and partial elimination of HE groups across all EW- or OVM-sIgE classes were similar (P > 0.05). Conclusions Stepwise OFC is safe and effective in diagnosing HE allergy and facilitates the earlier introduction of HE in children. This study suggests the limited potential of early consumption of lower doses of HE to induce earlier immune tolerance, such that other strategies to induce earlier tolerance in infants with HE allergy should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4Hen’s egg allergyOral food challengeOral immune toleranceStepwise oral food challenge
spellingShingle Mika Ogata
Jun Kido
Takanobu Yoshida
Natsuko Nishi
Sachiko Shimomura
Nami Hirai
Tomoyuki Mizukami
Masaaki Yanai
Kimitoshi Nakamura
The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Hen’s egg allergy
Oral food challenge
Oral immune tolerance
Stepwise oral food challenge
title The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
title_full The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
title_short The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen’s egg allergy
title_sort efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen s egg allergy
topic Hen’s egg allergy
Oral food challenge
Oral immune tolerance
Stepwise oral food challenge
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mikaogata theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT junkido theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT takanobuyoshida theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT natsukonishi theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT sachikoshimomura theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT namihirai theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT tomoyukimizukami theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT masaakiyanai theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT kimitoshinakamura theefficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT mikaogata efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT junkido efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT takanobuyoshida efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT natsukonishi efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT sachikoshimomura efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT namihirai efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT tomoyukimizukami efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT masaakiyanai efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy
AT kimitoshinakamura efficacyandsafetyofstepwiseoralfoodchallengeinchildrenwithhenseggallergy