Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation

The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission’s in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the J...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Göran Lövestam, Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann, Koen Jonkers, Pieter van Nes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:Research Ethics Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241243001
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560984674631680
author Göran Lövestam
Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann
Koen Jonkers
Pieter van Nes
author_facet Göran Lövestam
Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann
Koen Jonkers
Pieter van Nes
author_sort Göran Lövestam
collection DOAJ
description The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission’s in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for policymaking and has published numerous science-for-policy reports and scientific articles. Drawing on a scientific integrity statement, surveys among JRC’s research staff, and thematic discussions with JRC’s research leaders, the JRC has developed a comprehensive Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics (SIRE) framework, including instruments, procedures, and guidelines to ensure high standards and independence in its research. Key components of the SIRE framework include a Scientific Integrity Officer, an Editorial Review Board, a Research Ethics Board, and guidelines for responsible conduct of research. This article provides an overview of the JRC’s SIRE framework and how it was developed, emphasising the importance of maintaining independence, integrity, and ethics in scientific research that supports EU policy. The article also discusses potential gaps in the framework and where additional efforts may be needed, comparing with the recent U.S. National Science and Technology Council report on Protecting the Integrity of Government Science.
format Article
id doaj-art-a9beaa155d1e43bebf245fbd33975f00
institution Kabale University
issn 1747-0161
2047-6094
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Research Ethics Review
spelling doaj-art-a9beaa155d1e43bebf245fbd33975f002025-01-03T09:04:11ZengSAGE PublishingResearch Ethics Review1747-01612047-60942025-01-012110.1177/17470161241243001Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisationGöran LövestamSusanne Bremer-HoffmannKoen JonkersPieter van NesThe Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission’s in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for policymaking and has published numerous science-for-policy reports and scientific articles. Drawing on a scientific integrity statement, surveys among JRC’s research staff, and thematic discussions with JRC’s research leaders, the JRC has developed a comprehensive Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics (SIRE) framework, including instruments, procedures, and guidelines to ensure high standards and independence in its research. Key components of the SIRE framework include a Scientific Integrity Officer, an Editorial Review Board, a Research Ethics Board, and guidelines for responsible conduct of research. This article provides an overview of the JRC’s SIRE framework and how it was developed, emphasising the importance of maintaining independence, integrity, and ethics in scientific research that supports EU policy. The article also discusses potential gaps in the framework and where additional efforts may be needed, comparing with the recent U.S. National Science and Technology Council report on Protecting the Integrity of Government Science.https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241243001
spellingShingle Göran Lövestam
Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann
Koen Jonkers
Pieter van Nes
Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
Research Ethics Review
title Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
title_full Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
title_fullStr Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
title_full_unstemmed Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
title_short Fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science-for-policy research organisation
title_sort fostering scientific integrity and research ethics in a science for policy research organisation
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241243001
work_keys_str_mv AT goranlovestam fosteringscientificintegrityandresearchethicsinascienceforpolicyresearchorganisation
AT susannebremerhoffmann fosteringscientificintegrityandresearchethicsinascienceforpolicyresearchorganisation
AT koenjonkers fosteringscientificintegrityandresearchethicsinascienceforpolicyresearchorganisation
AT pietervannes fosteringscientificintegrityandresearchethicsinascienceforpolicyresearchorganisation