Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores

Some exoplanets have much higher densities than expected from stellar abundances of planet-forming elements. There are two theories—metal-rich formation hypothesis and naked core hypothesis—that explain how formation and evolution can alter the compositions and structures of rocky planets to diverge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zifan Lin, Saverio Cambioni, Sara Seager
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad86c3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841550025726885888
author Zifan Lin
Saverio Cambioni
Sara Seager
author_facet Zifan Lin
Saverio Cambioni
Sara Seager
author_sort Zifan Lin
collection DOAJ
description Some exoplanets have much higher densities than expected from stellar abundances of planet-forming elements. There are two theories—metal-rich formation hypothesis and naked core hypothesis—that explain how formation and evolution can alter the compositions and structures of rocky planets to diverge from their primordial building blocks. Here we revisit the naked core hypothesis, which states that high-density planets are remnant cores of giant planets that remain in a fossil-compressed state, even after envelope loss. Using a planetary interior model and assuming energy-limited atmospheric escape, we show that a large fraction, if not all, of the iron–silicate core of a giant planet is molten during the planet's early evolution. Upon envelope loss, the molten part of the planets can rapidly rebound owing to low viscosity, resulting in a decrease in radius by at most 0.06%, if they had hydrogen/helium envelopes, or by at most 7%, if they had H _2 O envelopes, compared to self-compressed counterparts with the same core mass fraction. Based on our findings, we reject the hypothesis that all high-density exoplanets are naked cores with Kolmogorov–Smirnov p -value ≪0.05 for both envelope compositions. We find that some high-density exoplanets can still possibly be naked cores, but the probabilities are lower than ∼1/2 and ∼1/3 for the ice giant and gas giant scenario, respectively, in 95% of the cases. We conclude that most high-density exoplanets are unlikely to be remnant giant planet cores.
format Article
id doaj-art-a928f777052248888e08abb8f610a44d
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-8205
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal Letters
spelling doaj-art-a928f777052248888e08abb8f610a44d2025-01-10T10:20:53ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal Letters2041-82052025-01-019782L4110.3847/2041-8213/ad86c3Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's CoresZifan Lin0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-9647Saverio Cambioni1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-4523Sara Seager2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-6948Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA ; zifanlin@mit.eduDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA ; zifanlin@mit.eduDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA ; zifanlin@mit.edu; Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USASome exoplanets have much higher densities than expected from stellar abundances of planet-forming elements. There are two theories—metal-rich formation hypothesis and naked core hypothesis—that explain how formation and evolution can alter the compositions and structures of rocky planets to diverge from their primordial building blocks. Here we revisit the naked core hypothesis, which states that high-density planets are remnant cores of giant planets that remain in a fossil-compressed state, even after envelope loss. Using a planetary interior model and assuming energy-limited atmospheric escape, we show that a large fraction, if not all, of the iron–silicate core of a giant planet is molten during the planet's early evolution. Upon envelope loss, the molten part of the planets can rapidly rebound owing to low viscosity, resulting in a decrease in radius by at most 0.06%, if they had hydrogen/helium envelopes, or by at most 7%, if they had H _2 O envelopes, compared to self-compressed counterparts with the same core mass fraction. Based on our findings, we reject the hypothesis that all high-density exoplanets are naked cores with Kolmogorov–Smirnov p -value ≪0.05 for both envelope compositions. We find that some high-density exoplanets can still possibly be naked cores, but the probabilities are lower than ∼1/2 and ∼1/3 for the ice giant and gas giant scenario, respectively, in 95% of the cases. We conclude that most high-density exoplanets are unlikely to be remnant giant planet cores.https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad86c3Exoplanet structureExoplanet evolutionPlanetary interiorPlanetary structure
spellingShingle Zifan Lin
Saverio Cambioni
Sara Seager
Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Exoplanet structure
Exoplanet evolution
Planetary interior
Planetary structure
title Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
title_full Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
title_fullStr Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
title_full_unstemmed Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
title_short Most High-density Exoplanets Are Unlikely to Be Remnant Giant Planet's Cores
title_sort most high density exoplanets are unlikely to be remnant giant planet s cores
topic Exoplanet structure
Exoplanet evolution
Planetary interior
Planetary structure
url https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad86c3
work_keys_str_mv AT zifanlin mosthighdensityexoplanetsareunlikelytoberemnantgiantplanetscores
AT saveriocambioni mosthighdensityexoplanetsareunlikelytoberemnantgiantplanetscores
AT saraseager mosthighdensityexoplanetsareunlikelytoberemnantgiantplanetscores