Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology for identifying pathogens associated with spinal infection (SI).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 193 patients with suspected SI between August 2020 and S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tengfei Shi, Yuhan Lin, Xuexin Zheng, Hongliang Ruan, Rui Zhang, Yinhuan Liu, Shaohan Xu, Huafeng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1437665/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556739139305472
author Tengfei Shi
Yuhan Lin
Xuexin Zheng
Hongliang Ruan
Rui Zhang
Yinhuan Liu
Shaohan Xu
Shaohan Xu
Huafeng Wang
author_facet Tengfei Shi
Yuhan Lin
Xuexin Zheng
Hongliang Ruan
Rui Zhang
Yinhuan Liu
Shaohan Xu
Shaohan Xu
Huafeng Wang
author_sort Tengfei Shi
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology for identifying pathogens associated with spinal infection (SI).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 193 patients with suspected SI between August 2020 and September 2024. Based on histopathological results, the patients were divided into the SI group (n=162) and the non-SI group (n=31). The diagnostic performance of mNGS technology was compared with that of laboratory examination, imaging examination, and microbial culture.ResultsAmong SI group, mNGS detected 135 pathogens in 77.78% (126/162) of the cases, including nine cases of multiple infections. One or more pathogens were detected using mNGS in 86 patients with SI and negative microbial cultures. Staphylococcus aureus (22.22%, n=30) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (22.22%, n=30) were the major pathogens, while various rare pathogens such as anaerobes, Brucella, and Coxiella burnetii were also detected. For the 40 cases with positive results for both culture- and mNGS-based identification, high consistency (77.50%) was observed. Antibiotic use did not significantly affect the mNGS detection rate (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in the positivity rate of mNGS between CT-guided needle biopsy (80.00%) and surgical sampling (77.17%) (P = 0.72). The sensitivity of mNGS (77.78%) was significantly higher than that of traditional microbial culture (27.16%), and the specificity was similar (90.32% vs. 96.77%). Although the sensitivities of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based assay (91.36%), magnetic resonance imaging (88.27%), and C-reactive protein-based assay (87.65%) were better than those of mNGS, their specificities were generally low (20%-40%).ConclusionThe pathogens responsible for SI are complex and diverse. As a novel diagnostic method, mNGS exhibits a high sensitivity and extensive pathogen coverage for SI diagnosis. When combined with imaging and laboratory indicators, mNGS can significantly improve the accuracy of SI diagnosis and provide strong support for clinical treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-a8ee389e4b224c0ba0d8d7b0d22b44ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2235-2988
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-a8ee389e4b224c0ba0d8d7b0d22b44ef2025-01-07T06:40:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology2235-29882025-01-011410.3389/fcimb.2024.14376651437665Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogensTengfei Shi0Yuhan Lin1Xuexin Zheng2Hongliang Ruan3Rui Zhang4Yinhuan Liu5Shaohan Xu6Shaohan Xu7Huafeng Wang8Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuzhou Second General Hospital (Fuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital), Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaBackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology for identifying pathogens associated with spinal infection (SI).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 193 patients with suspected SI between August 2020 and September 2024. Based on histopathological results, the patients were divided into the SI group (n=162) and the non-SI group (n=31). The diagnostic performance of mNGS technology was compared with that of laboratory examination, imaging examination, and microbial culture.ResultsAmong SI group, mNGS detected 135 pathogens in 77.78% (126/162) of the cases, including nine cases of multiple infections. One or more pathogens were detected using mNGS in 86 patients with SI and negative microbial cultures. Staphylococcus aureus (22.22%, n=30) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (22.22%, n=30) were the major pathogens, while various rare pathogens such as anaerobes, Brucella, and Coxiella burnetii were also detected. For the 40 cases with positive results for both culture- and mNGS-based identification, high consistency (77.50%) was observed. Antibiotic use did not significantly affect the mNGS detection rate (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in the positivity rate of mNGS between CT-guided needle biopsy (80.00%) and surgical sampling (77.17%) (P = 0.72). The sensitivity of mNGS (77.78%) was significantly higher than that of traditional microbial culture (27.16%), and the specificity was similar (90.32% vs. 96.77%). Although the sensitivities of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based assay (91.36%), magnetic resonance imaging (88.27%), and C-reactive protein-based assay (87.65%) were better than those of mNGS, their specificities were generally low (20%-40%).ConclusionThe pathogens responsible for SI are complex and diverse. As a novel diagnostic method, mNGS exhibits a high sensitivity and extensive pathogen coverage for SI diagnosis. When combined with imaging and laboratory indicators, mNGS can significantly improve the accuracy of SI diagnosis and provide strong support for clinical treatment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1437665/fullmetagenomic next-generation sequencingmicrobial culturespinal infectionpathogenssensitivityspecificity
spellingShingle Tengfei Shi
Yuhan Lin
Xuexin Zheng
Hongliang Ruan
Rui Zhang
Yinhuan Liu
Shaohan Xu
Shaohan Xu
Huafeng Wang
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
metagenomic next-generation sequencing
microbial culture
spinal infection
pathogens
sensitivity
specificity
title Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
title_full Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
title_fullStr Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
title_short Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens
title_sort metagenomic next generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection associated pathogens
topic metagenomic next-generation sequencing
microbial culture
spinal infection
pathogens
sensitivity
specificity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1437665/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tengfeishi metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT yuhanlin metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT xuexinzheng metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT hongliangruan metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT ruizhang metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT yinhuanliu metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT shaohanxu metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT shaohanxu metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens
AT huafengwang metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingfortheclinicalidentificationofspinalinfectionassociatedpathogens