National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption
Abstract International initiatives, such as the Bonn Challenge, Trillion Tree Campaign, New York Declaration on Forests, and United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have set ambitious targets for forest restoration. However, the effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of large‐scale forest restora...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Earth's Future |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004976 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846110211417309184 |
|---|---|
| author | Jiehao Zhang Yulong Zhang Xia Wang Tiehu He Huijuan Xia Kerong Zhang Quanfa Zhang |
| author_facet | Jiehao Zhang Yulong Zhang Xia Wang Tiehu He Huijuan Xia Kerong Zhang Quanfa Zhang |
| author_sort | Jiehao Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract International initiatives, such as the Bonn Challenge, Trillion Tree Campaign, New York Declaration on Forests, and United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have set ambitious targets for forest restoration. However, the effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of large‐scale forest restoration projects (FRP) in different climatic zones, and the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and water consumption caused by FRP are poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comprehensive examination of 2,778 counties in China, where the world's most ambitious FRP was executed during the past two decades. Results showed that, on average, each square kilometer of FRP yielded an additional 0.6 square kilometers of forests and contributed an extra 1354.9 tC to forest carbon storage, with the aridity index emerging as a key influencer. The actual expenditure incurred per ton of increased forest carbon storage amounted to approximately 118.9 USD in average, with the lowest in Southwest at 50.9 USD. The expansion of forest cover and enhanced biomass storage led to a notable increase in water consumption, and the trade‐off was particularly pronounced in arid regions. Our study provides empirical evidence that FRP is an effective and cost‐efficient climate change mitigation strategy for humid climate zones under current carbon prices. However, FRP is not cost‐efficient in semi‐arid and arid regions. These findings have significant implications for global forest restoration endeavors and formulating sound climate change mitigation policies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a8047d12119e462ebb57f9b03bb0aa8b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2328-4277 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Earth's Future |
| spelling | doaj-art-a8047d12119e462ebb57f9b03bb0aa8b2024-12-24T14:06:58ZengWileyEarth's Future2328-42772024-12-011212n/an/a10.1029/2024EF004976National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water ConsumptionJiehao Zhang0Yulong Zhang1Xia Wang2Tiehu He3Huijuan Xia4Kerong Zhang5Quanfa Zhang6Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaDivision of Earth and Climate Sciences Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University Durham NC USAKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology Wuhan Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan ChinaAbstract International initiatives, such as the Bonn Challenge, Trillion Tree Campaign, New York Declaration on Forests, and United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have set ambitious targets for forest restoration. However, the effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of large‐scale forest restoration projects (FRP) in different climatic zones, and the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and water consumption caused by FRP are poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comprehensive examination of 2,778 counties in China, where the world's most ambitious FRP was executed during the past two decades. Results showed that, on average, each square kilometer of FRP yielded an additional 0.6 square kilometers of forests and contributed an extra 1354.9 tC to forest carbon storage, with the aridity index emerging as a key influencer. The actual expenditure incurred per ton of increased forest carbon storage amounted to approximately 118.9 USD in average, with the lowest in Southwest at 50.9 USD. The expansion of forest cover and enhanced biomass storage led to a notable increase in water consumption, and the trade‐off was particularly pronounced in arid regions. Our study provides empirical evidence that FRP is an effective and cost‐efficient climate change mitigation strategy for humid climate zones under current carbon prices. However, FRP is not cost‐efficient in semi‐arid and arid regions. These findings have significant implications for global forest restoration endeavors and formulating sound climate change mitigation policies.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004976ecosystem restorationclimate change mitigationcarbon sequestrationevapotranspirationwater‐carbon trade‐off |
| spellingShingle | Jiehao Zhang Yulong Zhang Xia Wang Tiehu He Huijuan Xia Kerong Zhang Quanfa Zhang National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption Earth's Future ecosystem restoration climate change mitigation carbon sequestration evapotranspiration water‐carbon trade‐off |
| title | National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption |
| title_full | National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption |
| title_fullStr | National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption |
| title_full_unstemmed | National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption |
| title_short | National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption |
| title_sort | national forest restoration projects in china cost efficiency and trade off between carbon sequestration and water consumption |
| topic | ecosystem restoration climate change mitigation carbon sequestration evapotranspiration water‐carbon trade‐off |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004976 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jiehaozhang nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT yulongzhang nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT xiawang nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT tiehuhe nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT huijuanxia nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT kerongzhang nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption AT quanfazhang nationalforestrestorationprojectsinchinacostefficiencyandtradeoffbetweencarbonsequestrationandwaterconsumption |