Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of loaded whole body static squat exercise during whole body vibration and non-vibration schemes on countermovement jump (CMJ), speed and agility. Twenty-one healthy male college football players (age: 20.14 ± 1.65 years; body height: 179.9 ± 8.34...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Selcuk University Press
2014-02-01
|
| Series: | Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200672 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841561797858951168 |
|---|---|
| author | Edin Uå½ıäœanın Fuad Babajıä† Haris Pojskıä† Jeffrey Pagaduan Mario Tomljanovıä† Melika Muratovıä† |
| author_facet | Edin Uå½ıäœanın Fuad Babajıä† Haris Pojskıä† Jeffrey Pagaduan Mario Tomljanovıä† Melika Muratovıä† |
| author_sort | Edin Uå½ıäœanın |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of loaded whole body static squat exercise during whole body vibration and non-vibration schemes on countermovement jump (CMJ), speed and agility. Twenty-one healthy male college football players (age: 20.14 ± 1.65 years; body height: 179.9 ± 8.34 cm; body mass: 74.4 ± 13.0 kg; % body fat: 9.45 ± 4.8) participated in the study. They underwent a standardized general warm-up and dynamic stretching followed by randomized loaded protocols executed for 5 minutes with a rest interval of 30 seconds. These included static squat with 30% bodyweight external load (ST + 30%), ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 25 Hz and 2 mm (WBV25), and ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 50 Hz and 4mm. Measurement of CMJ, 15 m sprint and modified agility tests followed the warm-up protocol. One way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference on CMJ performance, F(2,40) = 24.5, partial η2 = .551, p lt; 0.01. Bonferonni post hoc showed that ST+30% posted significantly lower CMJ than WBV25 and WBV50. CMJ at WBV50 was higher than WBV25. There was a significant difference on speed, F(2, 40) = 23.6, partial η2 = .542, p lt; 0.01. Post hoc determined that ST+30% was significantly slower than WBV25 and WBV50. WBV50 was faster than WBV25. There was a significant difference in the agility among interventions, F(2, 40) = 18.2, partial η2 = .477, p lt; 0.01. ST+30% agility time was significantly higher compared to WBV25 and WBV50. In conclusion, WBV50 posted the greatest benefits in CMJ, speed and agility. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a7c281c40bbf4c138c31021cabb2d118 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2147-5652 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-02-01 |
| publisher | Selcuk University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj-art-a7c281c40bbf4c138c31021cabb2d1182025-01-03T01:23:52ZengSelcuk University PressTürk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi2147-56522014-02-011535659154Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agilityEdin Uå½ıäœanınFuad Babajıä†Haris Pojskıä†Jeffrey PagaduanMario Tomljanovıä†Melika Muratovıä†The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of loaded whole body static squat exercise during whole body vibration and non-vibration schemes on countermovement jump (CMJ), speed and agility. Twenty-one healthy male college football players (age: 20.14 ± 1.65 years; body height: 179.9 ± 8.34 cm; body mass: 74.4 ± 13.0 kg; % body fat: 9.45 ± 4.8) participated in the study. They underwent a standardized general warm-up and dynamic stretching followed by randomized loaded protocols executed for 5 minutes with a rest interval of 30 seconds. These included static squat with 30% bodyweight external load (ST + 30%), ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 25 Hz and 2 mm (WBV25), and ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 50 Hz and 4mm. Measurement of CMJ, 15 m sprint and modified agility tests followed the warm-up protocol. One way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference on CMJ performance, F(2,40) = 24.5, partial η2 = .551, p lt; 0.01. Bonferonni post hoc showed that ST+30% posted significantly lower CMJ than WBV25 and WBV50. CMJ at WBV50 was higher than WBV25. There was a significant difference on speed, F(2, 40) = 23.6, partial η2 = .542, p lt; 0.01. Post hoc determined that ST+30% was significantly slower than WBV25 and WBV50. WBV50 was faster than WBV25. There was a significant difference in the agility among interventions, F(2, 40) = 18.2, partial η2 = .477, p lt; 0.01. ST+30% agility time was significantly higher compared to WBV25 and WBV50. In conclusion, WBV50 posted the greatest benefits in CMJ, speed and agility.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200672football; warm-up; vibration training. |
| spellingShingle | Edin Uå½ıäœanın Fuad Babajıä† Haris Pojskıä† Jeffrey Pagaduan Mario Tomljanovıä† Melika Muratovıä† Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi football; warm-up; vibration training. |
| title | Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility |
| title_full | Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility |
| title_fullStr | Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility |
| title_full_unstemmed | Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility |
| title_short | Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility |
| title_sort | acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump speed and agility |
| topic | football; warm-up; vibration training. |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200672 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT edinua1⁄2ıaœanın acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility AT fuadbabajıa acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility AT harispojskıa acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility AT jeffreypagaduan acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility AT mariotomljanovıa acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility AT melikamuratovıa acuteeffectsofloadedwholebodyvibrationschemesoncountermovementjumpspeedandagility |