Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
FoundAE
2024-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Coaching and Sports Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841544010412326912 |
---|---|
author | Severiano Tiberi Joseph I. Esformes George Jennings Steve Cooper Jeremy Moody |
author_facet | Severiano Tiberi Joseph I. Esformes George Jennings Steve Cooper Jeremy Moody |
author_sort | Severiano Tiberi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a79019d9bcc94c17a22bf517210cce7f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2963-1459 2963-1483 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
publisher | FoundAE |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Coaching and Sports Science |
spelling | doaj-art-a79019d9bcc94c17a22bf517210cce7f2025-01-13T04:46:56ZengFoundAEJournal of Coaching and Sports Science2963-14592963-14832024-05-0132768910.58524/002024336600169Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task DependenceSeveriano Tiberi0Joseph I. Esformes1George Jennings2Steve Cooper3Jeremy Moody4Cardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan University, UNITED KINGDOM; Nisantasi University, TURKEYTo explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching.https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366coachingcoaching behaviour: coaching effectivenessleadershipstrengthconditioning. |
spellingShingle | Severiano Tiberi Joseph I. Esformes George Jennings Steve Cooper Jeremy Moody Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence Journal of Coaching and Sports Science coaching coaching behaviour: coaching effectiveness leadership strength conditioning. |
title | Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence |
title_full | Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence |
title_fullStr | Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence |
title_short | Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence |
title_sort | exploring coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning coaching preferences of ncaa division i and ii collegiate student athletes based on task dependence |
topic | coaching coaching behaviour: coaching effectiveness leadership strength conditioning. |
url | https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT severianotiberi exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence AT josephiesformes exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence AT georgejennings exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence AT stevecooper exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence AT jeremymoody exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence |