Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence

To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Severiano Tiberi, Joseph I. Esformes, George Jennings, Steve Cooper, Jeremy Moody
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FoundAE 2024-05-01
Series:Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544010412326912
author Severiano Tiberi
Joseph I. Esformes
George Jennings
Steve Cooper
Jeremy Moody
author_facet Severiano Tiberi
Joseph I. Esformes
George Jennings
Steve Cooper
Jeremy Moody
author_sort Severiano Tiberi
collection DOAJ
description To explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching.
format Article
id doaj-art-a79019d9bcc94c17a22bf517210cce7f
institution Kabale University
issn 2963-1459
2963-1483
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher FoundAE
record_format Article
series Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
spelling doaj-art-a79019d9bcc94c17a22bf517210cce7f2025-01-13T04:46:56ZengFoundAEJournal of Coaching and Sports Science2963-14592963-14832024-05-0132768910.58524/002024336600169Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task DependenceSeveriano Tiberi0Joseph I. Esformes1George Jennings2Steve Cooper3Jeremy Moody4Cardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiff Metropolitan University, UNITED KINGDOM; Nisantasi University, TURKEYTo explore collegiate student-athletes? preferences of coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning (SC) coaching and evaluate differences between the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours based on task dependence. Method a total of 145 National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (independent sports athletes = 48, interdependent sports athletes = 97), aged 18-25 years, with a mean = 3 (SD = ±1) SC sessions per week, participated. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire involving the athletes? preference version of the Revised Leadership Scale for SC. Results summary statistics revealed that the most favoured behaviour was 'training and instruction', median = 4.5 (IQR = 1.0), while the least favoured was ?autocratic?, median = 2.0 (IQR = 0.5). Independent sports athletes preferred training and instruction more (median = 5.0, IQR = 0.6) than interdependent sports athletes (median = 4.5, IQR = 1.0). Interdependent sports athletes preferred social support more (median = 3.5, IQR = 1.0) than independent sports athletes (median = 3.0, IQR = 0.6). The observation of a marginal statistically significant difference for social support suggests task-dependence-based variations (p = 0.018). However, small effect sizes indicate that differences are not practically significant. Conclusion and recommendation: this study presents insights into the preferences of coaching leadership behaviours among student-athletes in SC coaching. It highlights key behaviours such as training and instruction, positive feedback, situational considerations, and social support. These findings inform coaching practice and provide a foundation for further research into coaching leadership behaviours in SC coaching.https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366coachingcoaching behaviour: coaching effectivenessleadershipstrengthconditioning.
spellingShingle Severiano Tiberi
Joseph I. Esformes
George Jennings
Steve Cooper
Jeremy Moody
Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
coaching
coaching behaviour: coaching effectiveness
leadership
strength
conditioning.
title Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
title_full Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
title_fullStr Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
title_short Exploring Coaching Leadership Behaviours in Strength and Conditioning Coaching: Preferences of NCAA Division I and II Collegiate Student-Athletes Based on Task Dependence
title_sort exploring coaching leadership behaviours in strength and conditioning coaching preferences of ncaa division i and ii collegiate student athletes based on task dependence
topic coaching
coaching behaviour: coaching effectiveness
leadership
strength
conditioning.
url https://journal.foundae.com/index.php/jcss/article/view/366
work_keys_str_mv AT severianotiberi exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence
AT josephiesformes exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence
AT georgejennings exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence
AT stevecooper exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence
AT jeremymoody exploringcoachingleadershipbehavioursinstrengthandconditioningcoachingpreferencesofncaadivisioniandiicollegiatestudentathletesbasedontaskdependence