Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres

Abstract The current study aimed to evaluate short‐ and long‐term complication rates and functional outcomes in a substantial cohort of patients undergoing ileal ureter interposition at two high‐volume medical centres. Materials and methods A retrospective single‐arm analysis was conducted on patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maksym Pikul, David Pfister, Constantin Rieger, Christian Bach, Oleg Voylenko, Oleksandr Stakhovskyi, Sofiya Semko, Iurii Vitruk, Oleksii Kononenko, Eduard Stakhovsky, Axel Heidenreich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846110556794126336
author Maksym Pikul
David Pfister
Constantin Rieger
Christian Bach
Oleg Voylenko
Oleksandr Stakhovskyi
Sofiya Semko
Iurii Vitruk
Oleksii Kononenko
Eduard Stakhovsky
Axel Heidenreich
author_facet Maksym Pikul
David Pfister
Constantin Rieger
Christian Bach
Oleg Voylenko
Oleksandr Stakhovskyi
Sofiya Semko
Iurii Vitruk
Oleksii Kononenko
Eduard Stakhovsky
Axel Heidenreich
author_sort Maksym Pikul
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The current study aimed to evaluate short‐ and long‐term complication rates and functional outcomes in a substantial cohort of patients undergoing ileal ureter interposition at two high‐volume medical centres. Materials and methods A retrospective single‐arm analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ureter reconstruction using ileum between 2003 and 2022 at the University Clinic of Cologne and the National Cancer Institute of Ukraine. Data on aetiology, surgical techniques, pre‐ and postoperative kidney function changes, readmission rates and complication management were collected. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien–Dindo, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD‐EPI formula. Results Results revealed 107 cases with consistent data. Within 90 days post‐surgery, 53% experienced complications, mainly graded as I–II. Grade III complications were seen in 13%, with two cases of grade IV complications leading to extended hospitalisation and patient death. The 90‐day mortality rate was 1.8%. Over a mean follow‐up of 52 months, clinically significant vesico‐renal refluxes occurred in 28%, with only 5.4% leading to persistent urinary tract infection. Antireflux techniques appeared to reduce urine upflow incidence compared with conventional interposition. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 15% of patients, with 63% requiring permanent re‐stenting and 37% needing re‐anastomosis. Metabolic acidosis was clinically significant in 7.5% of cases. A slight improvement in renal function was observed during the first year post‐surgery (average postoperative eGFR = 76 ± 22 ml/min; Mann–Witney U test, p = 0,0198). Affected kidney function improved in 56 (52%), was stable in 41 (38%) and deteriorated in 10 (9.3%). Loss of kidney function on the surgery side was seen in 4 (3.7%) patients and resulted in nephrectomy in 3 (2.8%) cases. Conclusion Ileal ureter interposition demonstrated a favourable safety profile and functional outcomes. This surgical intervention provides an effective tension‐free bypass, irrespective of healthy ureter length.
format Article
id doaj-art-a73948f0f4c840128931c3efac88c1e6
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-a73948f0f4c840128931c3efac88c1e62024-12-24T02:30:44ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262024-10-015101038104710.1002/bco2.434Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centresMaksym Pikul0David Pfister1Constantin Rieger2Christian Bach3Oleg Voylenko4Oleksandr Stakhovskyi5Sofiya Semko6Iurii Vitruk7Oleksii Kononenko8Eduard Stakhovsky9Axel Heidenreich10Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne GermanyDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne GermanyDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne GermanyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv UkraineDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne GermanyAbstract The current study aimed to evaluate short‐ and long‐term complication rates and functional outcomes in a substantial cohort of patients undergoing ileal ureter interposition at two high‐volume medical centres. Materials and methods A retrospective single‐arm analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ureter reconstruction using ileum between 2003 and 2022 at the University Clinic of Cologne and the National Cancer Institute of Ukraine. Data on aetiology, surgical techniques, pre‐ and postoperative kidney function changes, readmission rates and complication management were collected. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien–Dindo, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD‐EPI formula. Results Results revealed 107 cases with consistent data. Within 90 days post‐surgery, 53% experienced complications, mainly graded as I–II. Grade III complications were seen in 13%, with two cases of grade IV complications leading to extended hospitalisation and patient death. The 90‐day mortality rate was 1.8%. Over a mean follow‐up of 52 months, clinically significant vesico‐renal refluxes occurred in 28%, with only 5.4% leading to persistent urinary tract infection. Antireflux techniques appeared to reduce urine upflow incidence compared with conventional interposition. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 15% of patients, with 63% requiring permanent re‐stenting and 37% needing re‐anastomosis. Metabolic acidosis was clinically significant in 7.5% of cases. A slight improvement in renal function was observed during the first year post‐surgery (average postoperative eGFR = 76 ± 22 ml/min; Mann–Witney U test, p = 0,0198). Affected kidney function improved in 56 (52%), was stable in 41 (38%) and deteriorated in 10 (9.3%). Loss of kidney function on the surgery side was seen in 4 (3.7%) patients and resulted in nephrectomy in 3 (2.8%) cases. Conclusion Ileal ureter interposition demonstrated a favourable safety profile and functional outcomes. This surgical intervention provides an effective tension‐free bypass, irrespective of healthy ureter length.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.434complex kidney tumoursindications to partial nephrectomynephrometryorgan‐sparing managementrenal‐cell carcinoma
spellingShingle Maksym Pikul
David Pfister
Constantin Rieger
Christian Bach
Oleg Voylenko
Oleksandr Stakhovskyi
Sofiya Semko
Iurii Vitruk
Oleksii Kononenko
Eduard Stakhovsky
Axel Heidenreich
Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
BJUI Compass
complex kidney tumours
indications to partial nephrectomy
nephrometry
organ‐sparing management
renal‐cell carcinoma
title Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
title_full Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
title_fullStr Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
title_full_unstemmed Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
title_short Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres
title_sort ureter ileum interposition combined experience from two high volume centres
topic complex kidney tumours
indications to partial nephrectomy
nephrometry
organ‐sparing management
renal‐cell carcinoma
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.434
work_keys_str_mv AT maksympikul ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT davidpfister ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT constantinrieger ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT christianbach ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT olegvoylenko ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT oleksandrstakhovskyi ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT sofiyasemko ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT iuriivitruk ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT oleksiikononenko ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT eduardstakhovsky ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres
AT axelheidenreich ureterileuminterpositioncombinedexperiencefromtwohighvolumecentres