Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)

Introduction Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael O’Sullivan, Michael S Gold, Francesca Orsini, Adriana Chebar Lozinsky, Paxton Loke, Susan L. Prescott, Patrick Quinn, Audrey DunnGalvin, Mimi LK Tang, Anne-Louise Ponsoby, Ee Lyn Su, Marnie Robinson, Dean Tey, Kuang-Chih Hsiao, Molly O’Sullivan, Christine Axelrad, Sigrid Pitkin, Jessica Metcalfe, Susan Fahy-Scheer, Thalayasingam Meera, Jovanka King, Fuad Abass, Abigail Cheung, Rachel Wallace, Samara Baldwin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035871.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554147983228928
author Michael O’Sullivan
Michael S Gold
Francesca Orsini
Adriana Chebar Lozinsky
Paxton Loke
Susan L. Prescott
Patrick Quinn
Audrey DunnGalvin
Mimi LK Tang
Anne-Louise Ponsoby
Ee Lyn Su
Marnie Robinson
Dean Tey
Kuang-Chih Hsiao
Molly O’Sullivan
Christine Axelrad
Sigrid Pitkin
Jessica Metcalfe
Susan Fahy-Scheer
Thalayasingam Meera
Jovanka King
Fuad Abass
Abigail Cheung
Rachel Wallace
Samara Baldwin
author_facet Michael O’Sullivan
Michael S Gold
Francesca Orsini
Adriana Chebar Lozinsky
Paxton Loke
Susan L. Prescott
Patrick Quinn
Audrey DunnGalvin
Mimi LK Tang
Anne-Louise Ponsoby
Ee Lyn Su
Marnie Robinson
Dean Tey
Kuang-Chih Hsiao
Molly O’Sullivan
Christine Axelrad
Sigrid Pitkin
Jessica Metcalfe
Susan Fahy-Scheer
Thalayasingam Meera
Jovanka King
Fuad Abass
Abigail Cheung
Rachel Wallace
Samara Baldwin
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 with peanut OIT (Probiotic Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy (PPOIT)) is highly effective at inducing SU, with benefit persisting to 4 years after treatment cessation in the majority of initial treatment responders. Here we describe the protocol for a Phase IIb multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial (PPOIT-003) with dual primary objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of PPOIT at inducing SU (assessed at 8 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with placebo treatment and peanut OIT alone, in children with peanut allergy.Methods and analysis 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms—PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children’s Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences.Trial registration number ACTRN12616000322437.
format Article
id doaj-art-a5af832b73a940c9b780bab879276ff1
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-a5af832b73a940c9b780bab879276ff12025-01-08T19:05:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study) 0Michael O’Sullivan1Michael S Gold2Francesca Orsini3Adriana Chebar Lozinsky4Paxton Loke5Susan L. Prescott6Patrick Quinn7Audrey DunnGalvin8Mimi LK Tang9Anne-Louise PonsobyEe Lyn SuMarnie RobinsonDean TeyKuang-Chih HsiaoMolly O’SullivanChristine AxelradSigrid PitkinJessica Metcalfe10Susan Fahy-ScheerThalayasingam MeeraJovanka King11Fuad AbassAbigail Cheung12Rachel WallaceSamara BaldwinGENYO, Pfizer-University, Granada, Spain, Granada, SpainORIGINS Project, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, AustraliaPaediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia4 Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaORIGINS Project, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, AustraliaAllergy and Immunology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaSchool of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaImmunology Department, Perth Children`s Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia8 Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Women`s and Children`s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaIntroduction Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 with peanut OIT (Probiotic Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy (PPOIT)) is highly effective at inducing SU, with benefit persisting to 4 years after treatment cessation in the majority of initial treatment responders. Here we describe the protocol for a Phase IIb multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial (PPOIT-003) with dual primary objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of PPOIT at inducing SU (assessed at 8 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with placebo treatment and peanut OIT alone, in children with peanut allergy.Methods and analysis 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms—PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children’s Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences.Trial registration number ACTRN12616000322437.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035871.full
spellingShingle Michael O’Sullivan
Michael S Gold
Francesca Orsini
Adriana Chebar Lozinsky
Paxton Loke
Susan L. Prescott
Patrick Quinn
Audrey DunnGalvin
Mimi LK Tang
Anne-Louise Ponsoby
Ee Lyn Su
Marnie Robinson
Dean Tey
Kuang-Chih Hsiao
Molly O’Sullivan
Christine Axelrad
Sigrid Pitkin
Jessica Metcalfe
Susan Fahy-Scheer
Thalayasingam Meera
Jovanka King
Fuad Abass
Abigail Cheung
Rachel Wallace
Samara Baldwin
Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
BMJ Open
title Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_full Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_fullStr Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_short Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_sort study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy ppoit in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy oit alone and with placebo the ppoit 003 study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035871.full
work_keys_str_mv AT studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT michaelosullivan studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT michaelsgold studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT francescaorsini studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT adrianachebarlozinsky studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT paxtonloke studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT susanlprescott studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT patrickquinn studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT audreydunngalvin studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT mimilktang studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT annelouiseponsoby studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT eelynsu studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT marnierobinson studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT deantey studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT kuangchihhsiao studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT mollyosullivan studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT christineaxelrad studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT sigridpitkin studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT jessicametcalfe studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT susanfahyscheer studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT thalayasingammeera studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT jovankaking studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT fuadabass studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT abigailcheung studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT rachelwallace studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT samarabaldwin studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study