Similar Survival But Less Chronic GVHD in Antithymocyte Globulin–Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplant Compared With Matched Sibling Transplant for Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma
The annual number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is increasing steadily. Comparative studies about haplo-HCT versus HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HCT) have been tried in acute myeloid leukemia and B-cell acute...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Cell Transplantation |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897241270401 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The annual number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is increasing steadily. Comparative studies about haplo-HCT versus HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HCT) have been tried in acute myeloid leukemia and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Few studies were reported in adult T-cell ALL (T-ALL). In this retrospective study, a total of 88 consecutive patients with T-ALL were enrolled who underwent MSD-HCT ( n = 24) and haplo-HCT ( n = 64) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between 2010 and 2022. Median follow-up for survivors was similar (43.5 [range: 7–88] months for MSD-HCT versus 43.5 (range: 6–144) months in the Haplo-HCT group). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was similar, 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16%–52%) after MSD-HCT versus 44% (95% CI, 31%–55%) after haplo-HCT, P = 0.52. The cumulative incidences of grade III–IV aGVHD were 8% (95% CI, 1%–23%) in the MSD-HCT group and 5% (95% CI, 1%–12%) in the haplo-HCT group ( P = 0.50). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (limited and extensive) in the haplo-HCT, 11% (95% CI, 5%–20%) was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HCT group (42% [95% CI, 21%–62%], P = 0.002). The cumulative incidence of 4-year relapse rates (44% versus 37%, P = 0.56) and non-relapse mortality (7% versus 21%, P = 0.08) did not differ between these two groups. There were also no differences in 4-year overall survival (46% versus 47%, P = 0.44) and progression-free survival (49% versus 42%, P = 0.45) between these two groups. On multivariate analysis, using busulfan/fludarabine (BU/Flu) conditioning regimen was found to be associated with worse clinical outcome. Our results suggested that ATG-based haplo-HCT platform could work as an alternative to MSD-HCT for adult patients with T-ALL. Compared with MSD-HCT, haplo-HCT might carry a low risk for cGVHD. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1555-3892 |