Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population
Introduction Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e084178.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536584369831936 |
|---|---|
| author | Janel Hanmer Richard Gershon Sandra Weintraub Zahra Hosseinian Emily H. Ho Berivan Ece Miriam A. Novack Sarah Pila Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers Molly A Mather Elizabeth McManus Dworak Patricia Bucko Aaron James Kaat S. Duke Han Peter Lichtenberg Corinne H Miller |
| author_facet | Janel Hanmer Richard Gershon Sandra Weintraub Zahra Hosseinian Emily H. Ho Berivan Ece Miriam A. Novack Sarah Pila Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers Molly A Mather Elizabeth McManus Dworak Patricia Bucko Aaron James Kaat S. Duke Han Peter Lichtenberg Corinne H Miller |
| author_sort | Janel Hanmer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic and comprehensive assessment of DM ability. While there are many DM measures, there is considerable heterogeneity in what constructs are measured and the populations in which they have been validated. This scoping review protocol details the proposed comprehensive examination of published literature on DM measures used in adults aged 45 years and older.Methods and analysis Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology framework will guide the current scoping review. We will systematically search Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate) and Scopus (Elsevier) to identify the studies meeting our eligibility criteria. We will review literature published between January 2018 and November 2023. Following best practice recommendations, a two-stage study selection process will be applied. First, titles and abstracts will be independently reviewed by two reviewers based on our eligibility criteria. Second, full texts will be screened and data will be extracted only from the articles included after the full review. The results of the current scoping review will be reported in adherence to PRISMA-Scr guidelines.Ethics and dissemination This study does not require ethics approval as the scoping review methodology involves reviewing results from publicly available published materials. Results of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration number NIA grant number 1U24AG082022-01. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a4be4d1b39e343a4a1ec439c04ac06ef |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-a4be4d1b39e343a4a1ec439c04ac06ef2025-01-14T15:40:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-12-01141210.1136/bmjopen-2024-084178Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing populationJanel Hanmer0Richard Gershon1Sandra Weintraub2Zahra Hosseinian3Emily H. Ho4Berivan Ece5Miriam A. Novack6Sarah Pila7Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers8Molly A Mather9Elizabeth McManus Dworak10Patricia Bucko11Aaron James Kaat12S. Duke Han13Peter Lichtenberg14Corinne H Miller156 Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA1 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA4 Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA5 Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA7 Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USAIntroduction Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic and comprehensive assessment of DM ability. While there are many DM measures, there is considerable heterogeneity in what constructs are measured and the populations in which they have been validated. This scoping review protocol details the proposed comprehensive examination of published literature on DM measures used in adults aged 45 years and older.Methods and analysis Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology framework will guide the current scoping review. We will systematically search Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate) and Scopus (Elsevier) to identify the studies meeting our eligibility criteria. We will review literature published between January 2018 and November 2023. Following best practice recommendations, a two-stage study selection process will be applied. First, titles and abstracts will be independently reviewed by two reviewers based on our eligibility criteria. Second, full texts will be screened and data will be extracted only from the articles included after the full review. The results of the current scoping review will be reported in adherence to PRISMA-Scr guidelines.Ethics and dissemination This study does not require ethics approval as the scoping review methodology involves reviewing results from publicly available published materials. Results of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration number NIA grant number 1U24AG082022-01.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e084178.full |
| spellingShingle | Janel Hanmer Richard Gershon Sandra Weintraub Zahra Hosseinian Emily H. Ho Berivan Ece Miriam A. Novack Sarah Pila Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers Molly A Mather Elizabeth McManus Dworak Patricia Bucko Aaron James Kaat S. Duke Han Peter Lichtenberg Corinne H Miller Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population BMJ Open |
| title | Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population |
| title_full | Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population |
| title_fullStr | Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population |
| title_short | Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population |
| title_sort | protocol for a multi domain scoping review to identify measures of decision making ability in an ageing population |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e084178.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janelhanmer protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT richardgershon protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT sandraweintraub protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT zahrahosseinian protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT emilyhho protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT berivanece protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT miriamanovack protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT sarahpila protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT tatianakarpouzianrogers protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT mollyamather protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT elizabethmcmanusdworak protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT patriciabucko protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT aaronjameskaat protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT sdukehan protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT peterlichtenberg protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation AT corinnehmiller protocolforamultidomainscopingreviewtoidentifymeasuresofdecisionmakingabilityinanageingpopulation |