Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
Regarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2018-05-01
|
Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841543855030140928 |
---|---|
author | roya letafati Bita Moazzami |
author_facet | roya letafati Bita Moazzami |
author_sort | roya letafati |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Regarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light on the improper critiques in academia with the purpose that eventually such critiques will be replaced with more scientifically written articles.In this paper, with precise focus on reasoning, the review of the critic is analyzed to depict how, considering the book’s limited number of readers and its medium, the comparison between this book and internationally acclaimed resource books which are published by international publishers cannot be a just comparison. Furthermore, why has the significant role of the publisher, regarding the review process and editing, been disregarded and rather authors are denounced for this issue? The current paper, undoubtedly, has not been written to defend the inefficiency of academic books in our country; the sole objective is to tackle the phenomenon of bad derivative review which is detrimental to the current situation of academia in the country. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a4af093a71f9431c8e47797f7d408387 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2383-1650 |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
record_format | Article |
series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
spelling | doaj-art-a4af093a71f9431c8e47797f7d4083872025-01-13T05:31:12ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502018-05-011831151343112Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanitiesroya letafati0Bita Moazzami1Associate Professor, Department of French Language and Didactic, Tarbiat Modares UniversityFrench Instructor, Department of French Language and Literature, Islamic Azad UniversityRegarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light on the improper critiques in academia with the purpose that eventually such critiques will be replaced with more scientifically written articles.In this paper, with precise focus on reasoning, the review of the critic is analyzed to depict how, considering the book’s limited number of readers and its medium, the comparison between this book and internationally acclaimed resource books which are published by international publishers cannot be a just comparison. Furthermore, why has the significant role of the publisher, regarding the review process and editing, been disregarded and rather authors are denounced for this issue? The current paper, undoubtedly, has not been written to defend the inefficiency of academic books in our country; the sole objective is to tackle the phenomenon of bad derivative review which is detrimental to the current situation of academia in the country.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdfbad derivative review« l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle »samt publicationsacademic book reviewteaching history of literature |
spellingShingle | roya letafati Bita Moazzami Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی bad derivative review « l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle » samt publications academic book review teaching history of literature |
title | Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities |
title_full | Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities |
title_fullStr | Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities |
title_full_unstemmed | Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities |
title_short | Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities |
title_sort | review for the reviewer s review pathology of book review l histoire de la litterature francaise du xixe siecle samt publication institute of humanities |
topic | bad derivative review « l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle » samt publications academic book review teaching history of literature |
url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT royaletafati reviewforthereviewersreviewpathologyofbookreviewlhistoiredelalitteraturefrancaiseduxixesieclesamtpublicationinstituteofhumanities AT bitamoazzami reviewforthereviewersreviewpathologyofbookreviewlhistoiredelalitteraturefrancaiseduxixesieclesamtpublicationinstituteofhumanities |