Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities

Regarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: roya letafati, Bita Moazzami
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2018-05-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543855030140928
author roya letafati
Bita Moazzami
author_facet roya letafati
Bita Moazzami
author_sort roya letafati
collection DOAJ
description Regarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light on the improper critiques in academia with the purpose that eventually such critiques will be replaced with more scientifically written articles.In this paper, with precise focus on reasoning, the review of the critic is analyzed to depict how, considering the book’s limited number of readers and its medium, the comparison between this book and internationally acclaimed resource books which are published by international publishers cannot be a just comparison. Furthermore, why has the significant role of the publisher, regarding the review process and editing, been disregarded and rather authors are denounced for this issue? The current paper, undoubtedly, has not been written to defend the inefficiency of academic books in our country; the sole objective is to tackle the phenomenon of bad derivative review which is detrimental to the current situation of academia in the country.
format Article
id doaj-art-a4af093a71f9431c8e47797f7d408387
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-a4af093a71f9431c8e47797f7d4083872025-01-13T05:31:12ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502018-05-011831151343112Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanitiesroya letafati0Bita Moazzami1Associate Professor, Department of French Language and Didactic, Tarbiat Modares UniversityFrench Instructor, Department of French Language and Literature, Islamic Azad UniversityRegarding the book review of « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT publications which appears to be more a bad derivative review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light on the improper critiques in academia with the purpose that eventually such critiques will be replaced with more scientifically written articles.In this paper, with precise focus on reasoning, the review of the critic is analyzed to depict how, considering the book’s limited number of readers and its medium, the comparison between this book and internationally acclaimed resource books which are published by international publishers cannot be a just comparison. Furthermore, why has the significant role of the publisher, regarding the review process and editing, been disregarded and rather authors are denounced for this issue? The current paper, undoubtedly, has not been written to defend the inefficiency of academic books in our country; the sole objective is to tackle the phenomenon of bad derivative review which is detrimental to the current situation of academia in the country.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdfbad derivative review« l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle »samt publicationsacademic book reviewteaching history of literature
spellingShingle roya letafati
Bita Moazzami
Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
bad derivative review
« l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle »
samt publications
academic book review
teaching history of literature
title Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
title_full Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
title_fullStr Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
title_full_unstemmed Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
title_short Review for the Reviewer’s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’Histoire de la Littérature française du XIXe siècle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities
title_sort review for the reviewer s review pathology of book review l histoire de la litterature francaise du xixe siecle samt publication institute of humanities
topic bad derivative review
« l’histoire de la littérature française du xixe siècle »
samt publications
academic book review
teaching history of literature
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3112_87b997d06590a0eae4800c19ca30eb40.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT royaletafati reviewforthereviewersreviewpathologyofbookreviewlhistoiredelalitteraturefrancaiseduxixesieclesamtpublicationinstituteofhumanities
AT bitamoazzami reviewforthereviewersreviewpathologyofbookreviewlhistoiredelalitteraturefrancaiseduxixesieclesamtpublicationinstituteofhumanities