Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet
Since the death of Jean Genet, his name and oeuvre have been the subject of heated debate. Influential critics have argued that Genet was an aristocratic anti-Semite, rather than a revolutionary poet who took sides with the outcasts. In this article, I analyze the positions, patterns, and strategie...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Föreningen Tidskriften Moderna språk
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Moderna Språk |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://publicera.kb.se/mosp/article/view/7729 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846139207521665024 |
|---|---|
| author | Karl Ågerup |
| author_facet | Karl Ågerup |
| author_sort | Karl Ågerup |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Since the death of Jean Genet, his name and oeuvre have been the subject of heated debate. Influential critics have argued that Genet was an aristocratic anti-Semite, rather than a revolutionary poet who took sides with the outcasts. In this article, I analyze the positions, patterns, and strategies of this multifaceted debate, suggesting that provocation and marginalization constitute an integral part of Genet’s aesthetics. In the act of judging Genet from historical, political, and ethical perspectives, the critics operate as executors of his literary project, confirming the paratopic position the writer presumably desired.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a3bebf92cba64271a28e0f658d37375c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2000-3560 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Föreningen Tidskriften Moderna språk |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Moderna Språk |
| spelling | doaj-art-a3bebf92cba64271a28e0f658d37375c2024-12-06T11:58:35ZdeuFöreningen Tidskriften Moderna språkModerna Språk2000-35602017-12-01111210.58221/mosp.v111i2.7729Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean GenetKarl Ågerup0University of Gothenburg Since the death of Jean Genet, his name and oeuvre have been the subject of heated debate. Influential critics have argued that Genet was an aristocratic anti-Semite, rather than a revolutionary poet who took sides with the outcasts. In this article, I analyze the positions, patterns, and strategies of this multifaceted debate, suggesting that provocation and marginalization constitute an integral part of Genet’s aesthetics. In the act of judging Genet from historical, political, and ethical perspectives, the critics operate as executors of his literary project, confirming the paratopic position the writer presumably desired. https://publicera.kb.se/mosp/article/view/7729ideologyparatopeaestheticscanoncriticism |
| spellingShingle | Karl Ågerup Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet Moderna Språk ideology paratope aesthetics canon criticism |
| title | Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet |
| title_full | Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet |
| title_fullStr | Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet |
| title_full_unstemmed | Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet |
| title_short | Competing Images. The Posthumous Reception of Jean Genet |
| title_sort | competing images the posthumous reception of jean genet |
| topic | ideology paratope aesthetics canon criticism |
| url | https://publicera.kb.se/mosp/article/view/7729 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karlagerup competingimagestheposthumousreceptionofjeangenet |