Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management
Considering the impact of water resources management, with Dongguan City as an example, a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of water management, safety, economy, and environment index was constructed. A gray correlation coefficient was also introduced to establish a coupling model based on...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Office of Pearl River
2024-08-01
|
Series: | Renmin Zhujiang |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2024.08.008 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841530613902868480 |
---|---|
author | XIAO Yixuan ZHENG Yanhui HE Yanhu CHEN Xiaohong GU Xihui TU Jingjing |
author_facet | XIAO Yixuan ZHENG Yanhui HE Yanhu CHEN Xiaohong GU Xihui TU Jingjing |
author_sort | XIAO Yixuan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Considering the impact of water resources management, with Dongguan City as an example, a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of water management, safety, economy, and environment index was constructed. A gray correlation coefficient was also introduced to establish a coupling model based on gray correlation-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, to achieve the optimal selection of the water source allocation scheme. It was found that the water management index would affect the optimal selection result of the scheme. When the impact of water source management is not considered, the water economic index plays a leading role. The optimal scheme is 365 million m³/year of river-reservoir interconnection project (RRIP) and 95 million m³/year Pearl River Delta Water Resources Allocation project (PRDWRAP), while the alternative is 292 million m³/year of RRIP and 168 million m³/year of PRDWRAP. When the impact of water resources management is considered, the optimal scheme is 365 million m³/year of RRIP and 95 million m³/year of PRDWRAP, while the alternative is 37 million m³/year of RRIP, 330 million m³/year of PRDWRAP and 93 million m³/year of built water works. The index system and optimal model constructed in this study not only consider the current water supply cost, water supply guarantee rate and waste sewage discharge, but also the management difficulty in the future and the unknown following management cost. A more scientific and comprehensive decision-making basis for decision makers is thus provided. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a3538593f6e44f41830ca941df29f073 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1001-9235 |
language | zho |
publishDate | 2024-08-01 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Pearl River |
record_format | Article |
series | Renmin Zhujiang |
spelling | doaj-art-a3538593f6e44f41830ca941df29f0732025-01-15T03:01:22ZzhoEditorial Office of Pearl RiverRenmin Zhujiang1001-92352024-08-0145657266690910Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource ManagementXIAO YixuanZHENG YanhuiHE YanhuCHEN XiaohongGU XihuiTU JingjingConsidering the impact of water resources management, with Dongguan City as an example, a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of water management, safety, economy, and environment index was constructed. A gray correlation coefficient was also introduced to establish a coupling model based on gray correlation-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, to achieve the optimal selection of the water source allocation scheme. It was found that the water management index would affect the optimal selection result of the scheme. When the impact of water source management is not considered, the water economic index plays a leading role. The optimal scheme is 365 million m³/year of river-reservoir interconnection project (RRIP) and 95 million m³/year Pearl River Delta Water Resources Allocation project (PRDWRAP), while the alternative is 292 million m³/year of RRIP and 168 million m³/year of PRDWRAP. When the impact of water resources management is considered, the optimal scheme is 365 million m³/year of RRIP and 95 million m³/year of PRDWRAP, while the alternative is 37 million m³/year of RRIP, 330 million m³/year of PRDWRAP and 93 million m³/year of built water works. The index system and optimal model constructed in this study not only consider the current water supply cost, water supply guarantee rate and waste sewage discharge, but also the management difficulty in the future and the unknown following management cost. A more scientific and comprehensive decision-making basis for decision makers is thus provided.http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2024.08.008water resource managementoptimization of water resource allocation schemesgrey relational analysisfuzzy comprehensive evaluation |
spellingShingle | XIAO Yixuan ZHENG Yanhui HE Yanhu CHEN Xiaohong GU Xihui TU Jingjing Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management Renmin Zhujiang water resource management optimization of water resource allocation schemes grey relational analysis fuzzy comprehensive evaluation |
title | Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management |
title_full | Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management |
title_fullStr | Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management |
title_short | Optimal Selection of Water Resource Allocation Schemes Considering the Impact of Water Resource Management |
title_sort | optimal selection of water resource allocation schemes considering the impact of water resource management |
topic | water resource management optimization of water resource allocation schemes grey relational analysis fuzzy comprehensive evaluation |
url | http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2024.08.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoyixuan optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement AT zhengyanhui optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement AT heyanhu optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement AT chenxiaohong optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement AT guxihui optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement AT tujingjing optimalselectionofwaterresourceallocationschemesconsideringtheimpactofwaterresourcemanagement |