Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape

ABSTRACT Habitat fragmentation and isolation can result in decreased occupancy and reproductive success within songbirds, particularly for species inhabiting urban environments where available habitat may be limited. The golden‐cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) is a federally endangered songbi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dianne H. Robinson, Heather A. Mathewson, Michael L. Morrison, R. Neal Wilkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.850
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846120018657411072
author Dianne H. Robinson
Heather A. Mathewson
Michael L. Morrison
R. Neal Wilkins
author_facet Dianne H. Robinson
Heather A. Mathewson
Michael L. Morrison
R. Neal Wilkins
author_sort Dianne H. Robinson
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Habitat fragmentation and isolation can result in decreased occupancy and reproductive success within songbirds, particularly for species inhabiting urban environments where available habitat may be limited. The golden‐cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) is a federally endangered songbird that inhabits oak–juniper (Quercus spp.–Juniperus spp.) woodlands across central Texas, USA. Past research has indicated decreased patch occupancy and productivity near urban areas. We monitored patch occupancy, territory establishment, pairing success, and fledging success of warblers in an urban environment. Warblers occupied 24% (n = 63) of patches surveyed; 10% (n = 63) of habitat patches had ≥1 established territory. Warblers successfully paired in 4 patches and fledged young in 3 patches. We found an increasing probability of occupancy at approximately 65–70% canopy cover, and an added effect of distance to the nearest habitat patch. We found that distance to and size of the nearest habitat patch best predicted territory establishment. Patch size and size of the nearest habitat patch best predicted pairing success. Although our results were inconclusive for fledging success, a review of available data suggests patch size, size of, and distance to the nearest habitat patch all affect warbler reproductive activity. We recommend to manage for oak–juniper woodland patches with >70% canopy cover that are >26 ha in size, in close proximity to other oak–juniper woodland patches with equal or greater canopy cover and patch size when managing for golden‐cheeked warblers within an urban matrix. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-a33fd96d252047b7aac07e7adb0fca50
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-a33fd96d252047b7aac07e7adb0fca502024-12-16T13:40:44ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402018-03-01421485610.1002/wsb.850Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscapeDianne H. Robinson0Heather A. Mathewson1Michael L. Morrison2R. Neal Wilkins3Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX 77843USATexas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural ResourcesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USADepartment of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX 77843USATexas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural ResourcesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USAABSTRACT Habitat fragmentation and isolation can result in decreased occupancy and reproductive success within songbirds, particularly for species inhabiting urban environments where available habitat may be limited. The golden‐cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) is a federally endangered songbird that inhabits oak–juniper (Quercus spp.–Juniperus spp.) woodlands across central Texas, USA. Past research has indicated decreased patch occupancy and productivity near urban areas. We monitored patch occupancy, territory establishment, pairing success, and fledging success of warblers in an urban environment. Warblers occupied 24% (n = 63) of patches surveyed; 10% (n = 63) of habitat patches had ≥1 established territory. Warblers successfully paired in 4 patches and fledged young in 3 patches. We found an increasing probability of occupancy at approximately 65–70% canopy cover, and an added effect of distance to the nearest habitat patch. We found that distance to and size of the nearest habitat patch best predicted territory establishment. Patch size and size of the nearest habitat patch best predicted pairing success. Although our results were inconclusive for fledging success, a review of available data suggests patch size, size of, and distance to the nearest habitat patch all affect warbler reproductive activity. We recommend to manage for oak–juniper woodland patches with >70% canopy cover that are >26 ha in size, in close proximity to other oak–juniper woodland patches with equal or greater canopy cover and patch size when managing for golden‐cheeked warblers within an urban matrix. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.850golden‐cheeked warblerhabitat characteristicsoccupancyproductivitySetophaga chrysopariaurban matrix
spellingShingle Dianne H. Robinson
Heather A. Mathewson
Michael L. Morrison
R. Neal Wilkins
Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
Wildlife Society Bulletin
golden‐cheeked warbler
habitat characteristics
occupancy
productivity
Setophaga chrysoparia
urban matrix
title Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
title_full Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
title_fullStr Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
title_full_unstemmed Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
title_short Habitat effects on golden‐cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
title_sort habitat effects on golden cheeked warbler productivity in an urban landscape
topic golden‐cheeked warbler
habitat characteristics
occupancy
productivity
Setophaga chrysoparia
urban matrix
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.850
work_keys_str_mv AT diannehrobinson habitateffectsongoldencheekedwarblerproductivityinanurbanlandscape
AT heatheramathewson habitateffectsongoldencheekedwarblerproductivityinanurbanlandscape
AT michaellmorrison habitateffectsongoldencheekedwarblerproductivityinanurbanlandscape
AT rnealwilkins habitateffectsongoldencheekedwarblerproductivityinanurbanlandscape