Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning
<p>While Earth system models are essential for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction, they often exhibit significant errors that are challenging to correct. In this study, we integrate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) machine learning (ML) model into the Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM) t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | The Cryosphere |
| Online Access: | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3279/2025/tc-19-3279-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849222414871822336 |
|---|---|
| author | Z. He Z. He Z. He Y. Wang J. Brajard X. Wang X. Wang Z. Shen Z. Shen |
| author_facet | Z. He Z. He Z. He Y. Wang J. Brajard X. Wang X. Wang Z. Shen Z. Shen |
| author_sort | Z. He |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>While Earth system models are essential for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction, they often exhibit significant errors that are challenging to correct. In this study, we integrate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) machine learning (ML) model into the Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM) to improve seasonal sea ice predictions. We compare the online and offline error correction approaches. In the online approach, ML corrects errors in the model's instantaneous state during the model simulation, while in the offline approach, ML post-processes and calibrates predictions after the model simulation. Our results show that the ML models effectively learn and correct dynamical model errors in both approaches, leading to improved predictions of Arctic sea ice during the test period (i.e., 2003–2021). Both approaches yield the most significant improvements in the marginal ice zone, where error reductions in sea ice concentration exceed <span class="inline-formula">20 %</span>. These improvements vary seasonally, with the most substantial enhancements occurring in the Atlantic, Siberian, and Pacific regions from September to January. The offline error correction approach consistently outperforms the online error correction approach. This is primarily because the online approach targets only instantaneous model errors on the 15th of each month, while errors can grow during the subsequent 1-month model integration due to interactions among the model components, damping the error correction in monthly averages. Notably, in September, the online approach reduces the error of the pan-Arctic sea ice extent by <span class="inline-formula">50 %</span>, while the offline approach achieves a <span class="inline-formula">75 %</span> error reduction.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a259a0f134b34d3586a20c2dee4cc6d8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Cryosphere |
| spelling | doaj-art-a259a0f134b34d3586a20c2dee4cc6d82025-08-26T05:30:44ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242025-08-01193279329310.5194/tc-19-3279-2025Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learningZ. He0Z. He1Z. He2Y. Wang3J. Brajard4X. Wang5X. Wang6Z. Shen7Z. Shen8Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, ChinaCollege of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, ChinaNansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 3, Bergen, 5007, NorwayNansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 3, Bergen, 5007, NorwayNansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 3, Bergen, 5007, NorwayKey Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, ChinaCollege of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, ChinaKey Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, ChinaCollege of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China<p>While Earth system models are essential for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction, they often exhibit significant errors that are challenging to correct. In this study, we integrate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) machine learning (ML) model into the Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM) to improve seasonal sea ice predictions. We compare the online and offline error correction approaches. In the online approach, ML corrects errors in the model's instantaneous state during the model simulation, while in the offline approach, ML post-processes and calibrates predictions after the model simulation. Our results show that the ML models effectively learn and correct dynamical model errors in both approaches, leading to improved predictions of Arctic sea ice during the test period (i.e., 2003–2021). Both approaches yield the most significant improvements in the marginal ice zone, where error reductions in sea ice concentration exceed <span class="inline-formula">20 %</span>. These improvements vary seasonally, with the most substantial enhancements occurring in the Atlantic, Siberian, and Pacific regions from September to January. The offline error correction approach consistently outperforms the online error correction approach. This is primarily because the online approach targets only instantaneous model errors on the 15th of each month, while errors can grow during the subsequent 1-month model integration due to interactions among the model components, damping the error correction in monthly averages. Notably, in September, the online approach reduces the error of the pan-Arctic sea ice extent by <span class="inline-formula">50 %</span>, while the offline approach achieves a <span class="inline-formula">75 %</span> error reduction.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3279/2025/tc-19-3279-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Z. He Z. He Z. He Y. Wang J. Brajard X. Wang X. Wang Z. Shen Z. Shen Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning The Cryosphere |
| title | Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning |
| title_full | Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning |
| title_fullStr | Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning |
| title_short | Correcting errors in seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction of Earth system models with machine learning |
| title_sort | correcting errors in seasonal arctic sea ice prediction of earth system models with machine learning |
| url | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3279/2025/tc-19-3279-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhe correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT zhe correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT zhe correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT ywang correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT jbrajard correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT xwang correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT xwang correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT zshen correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning AT zshen correctingerrorsinseasonalarcticseaicepredictionofearthsystemmodelswithmachinelearning |