Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK

Objectives To design, deliver and evaluate a programme of training workshops for biomedical researchers aimed at building confidence and skills in actively involving patients and the public (PPI) in research.Design A bespoke programme of training workshops in PPI aimed at researchers.Setting A large...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Denegri, Rosamund Yu, Bec Hanley, Jaber Ahmed, Nicholas J McNally
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e047995.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846136408147755008
author Simon Denegri
Rosamund Yu
Bec Hanley
Jaber Ahmed
Nicholas J McNally
author_facet Simon Denegri
Rosamund Yu
Bec Hanley
Jaber Ahmed
Nicholas J McNally
author_sort Simon Denegri
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To design, deliver and evaluate a programme of training workshops for biomedical researchers aimed at building confidence and skills in actively involving patients and the public (PPI) in research.Design A bespoke programme of training workshops in PPI aimed at researchers.Setting A large National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in London and several partner organisations.Participants 721 scientists, clinicians and research managers attending dedicated training in PPI at a major London NHS (National Health Service)–university partnership.Interventions A programme of 72 training workshops, designed to build practical skills and confidence for researchers working with patients and the public in research, was delivered at a major research-active NHS:university partnership. An iterative approach was taken to the programme, with the content of the workshops continually reviewed and refreshed to respond to the needs of researchers. Surveys before, immediately following and 6 months after training investigated the impact on researchers’ confidence and skills in PPI work, and the kind of PPI they subsequently carried out.Results Training brought about immediate marked increases in researchers’ self-reported confidence to carry out PPI activities within their research, and in their knowledge of good practice. The evaluation indicates that workshop attendees were more likely to involve patients in their research following training. Researchers tended to involve patients and the public in a range of areas, including input to study design and patient information, in particular.Conclusions When positioned within a broader organisational strategy for PPI in research, such training has an important role to play in progressing PPI in a major research partnership. Training appeared to provide the confidence needed to carry out PPI which enabled further development of confidence and skills. Involving researchers who have attended the training in the ongoing development of the programme and bringing in patients to the training programme are key next steps.
format Article
id doaj-art-a22f8d0a514b4a16b993bf6c4d16a178
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-a22f8d0a514b4a16b993bf6c4d16a1782024-12-09T05:35:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-08-0111810.1136/bmjopen-2020-047995Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UKSimon Denegri0Rosamund Yu1Bec Hanley2Jaber Ahmed3Nicholas J McNally4Academy of Medical Sciences, London, UKNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UKNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKObjectives To design, deliver and evaluate a programme of training workshops for biomedical researchers aimed at building confidence and skills in actively involving patients and the public (PPI) in research.Design A bespoke programme of training workshops in PPI aimed at researchers.Setting A large National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in London and several partner organisations.Participants 721 scientists, clinicians and research managers attending dedicated training in PPI at a major London NHS (National Health Service)–university partnership.Interventions A programme of 72 training workshops, designed to build practical skills and confidence for researchers working with patients and the public in research, was delivered at a major research-active NHS:university partnership. An iterative approach was taken to the programme, with the content of the workshops continually reviewed and refreshed to respond to the needs of researchers. Surveys before, immediately following and 6 months after training investigated the impact on researchers’ confidence and skills in PPI work, and the kind of PPI they subsequently carried out.Results Training brought about immediate marked increases in researchers’ self-reported confidence to carry out PPI activities within their research, and in their knowledge of good practice. The evaluation indicates that workshop attendees were more likely to involve patients in their research following training. Researchers tended to involve patients and the public in a range of areas, including input to study design and patient information, in particular.Conclusions When positioned within a broader organisational strategy for PPI in research, such training has an important role to play in progressing PPI in a major research partnership. Training appeared to provide the confidence needed to carry out PPI which enabled further development of confidence and skills. Involving researchers who have attended the training in the ongoing development of the programme and bringing in patients to the training programme are key next steps.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e047995.full
spellingShingle Simon Denegri
Rosamund Yu
Bec Hanley
Jaber Ahmed
Nicholas J McNally
Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
BMJ Open
title Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
title_full Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
title_fullStr Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
title_short Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK
title_sort evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the uk
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e047995.full
work_keys_str_mv AT simondenegri evaluationofapatientandpublicinvolvementtrainingprogrammeforresearchersatalargebiomedicalresearchcentreintheuk
AT rosamundyu evaluationofapatientandpublicinvolvementtrainingprogrammeforresearchersatalargebiomedicalresearchcentreintheuk
AT bechanley evaluationofapatientandpublicinvolvementtrainingprogrammeforresearchersatalargebiomedicalresearchcentreintheuk
AT jaberahmed evaluationofapatientandpublicinvolvementtrainingprogrammeforresearchersatalargebiomedicalresearchcentreintheuk
AT nicholasjmcnally evaluationofapatientandpublicinvolvementtrainingprogrammeforresearchersatalargebiomedicalresearchcentreintheuk