Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips

Abstract Background In the treatment of DDH, stable but dysplastic hips are safe to observe, and these children do not usually need abduction treatment. It has been reported, that also clinically unstable hips have good spontaneous recovery potential, but only a few studies have investigated the obs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilma Lankinen, Mika Helminen, Karim Bakti, Jarmo Välipakka, Hannele Laivuori, Anna Hyvärinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05940-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234469211340800
author Vilma Lankinen
Mika Helminen
Karim Bakti
Jarmo Välipakka
Hannele Laivuori
Anna Hyvärinen
author_facet Vilma Lankinen
Mika Helminen
Karim Bakti
Jarmo Välipakka
Hannele Laivuori
Anna Hyvärinen
author_sort Vilma Lankinen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In the treatment of DDH, stable but dysplastic hips are safe to observe, and these children do not usually need abduction treatment. It has been reported, that also clinically unstable hips have good spontaneous recovery potential, but only a few studies have investigated the observation strategy in clinically mildly unstable (Barlow positive) hips. A conclusion on the safe treatment strategy for these children has not been made. Materials and methods All early diagnosed mildly unstable (Ortolani negative) hips treated in Tampere University Hospital in 1998–2018 were found, and data was retrospectively collected from the medical records. A total of 510 children were found. There were 222 children with Barlow-positive hips of which 45% were first observed, and 288 children with reported clinically mild hip instability but no reported Barlow-positivity of which 90% were first observed. All the analyses were done separately for these two groups of children. Results Girls were more likely to need abduction treatment after observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable groups. There were no differences in the six-month alpha angle or treatment failure rates between early-treated and first-observed children in either of the study groups. Duration of the treatment was not increased in observed children in either of the study groups. Conclusion Observation for about a month in clinically mildly unstable hips with or without Barlow positive signs seems safe regarding the recovery of alpha angles, treatment duration and treatment failures. More research is needed for longer observation times.
format Article
id doaj-art-a19d6ddd0d3a48199340e5105e914cc1
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2431
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-a19d6ddd0d3a48199340e5105e914cc12025-08-20T04:03:07ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312025-08-012511810.1186/s12887-025-05940-xEarly abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hipsVilma Lankinen0Mika Helminen1Karim Bakti2Jarmo Välipakka3Hannele Laivuori4Anna Hyvärinen5Department of Pediatric Surgery, Turku University HospitalFaculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, Tampere UniversityFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere UniversityPihlajalinnaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Mehiläinen Länsi-Pohja OyAbstract Background In the treatment of DDH, stable but dysplastic hips are safe to observe, and these children do not usually need abduction treatment. It has been reported, that also clinically unstable hips have good spontaneous recovery potential, but only a few studies have investigated the observation strategy in clinically mildly unstable (Barlow positive) hips. A conclusion on the safe treatment strategy for these children has not been made. Materials and methods All early diagnosed mildly unstable (Ortolani negative) hips treated in Tampere University Hospital in 1998–2018 were found, and data was retrospectively collected from the medical records. A total of 510 children were found. There were 222 children with Barlow-positive hips of which 45% were first observed, and 288 children with reported clinically mild hip instability but no reported Barlow-positivity of which 90% were first observed. All the analyses were done separately for these two groups of children. Results Girls were more likely to need abduction treatment after observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable groups. There were no differences in the six-month alpha angle or treatment failure rates between early-treated and first-observed children in either of the study groups. Duration of the treatment was not increased in observed children in either of the study groups. Conclusion Observation for about a month in clinically mildly unstable hips with or without Barlow positive signs seems safe regarding the recovery of alpha angles, treatment duration and treatment failures. More research is needed for longer observation times.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05940-xDDHBarlow positiveWatchful waiting strategySpontaneous recovery
spellingShingle Vilma Lankinen
Mika Helminen
Karim Bakti
Jarmo Välipakka
Hannele Laivuori
Anna Hyvärinen
Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
BMC Pediatrics
DDH
Barlow positive
Watchful waiting strategy
Spontaneous recovery
title Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
title_full Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
title_fullStr Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
title_full_unstemmed Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
title_short Early abduction treatment versus observation in Barlow-positive and mildly unstable hips
title_sort early abduction treatment versus observation in barlow positive and mildly unstable hips
topic DDH
Barlow positive
Watchful waiting strategy
Spontaneous recovery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05940-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vilmalankinen earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips
AT mikahelminen earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips
AT karimbakti earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips
AT jarmovalipakka earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips
AT hannelelaivuori earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips
AT annahyvarinen earlyabductiontreatmentversusobservationinbarlowpositiveandmildlyunstablehips