Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Different anesthetic drugs and techniques may affect survival outcomes for gastric cancer (GC) after surgery. In this study, we investigated the association between sedated and unsedated gastroscopy on survival outcomes in patients with GC after surgery. Methods This was a retros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chengke Yin, Yiwu Sun, Jie Liang, Xin Sui, Zhaoyi He, Ailing Song, Wenjia Xu, Lei Zhang, Yufei Sun, Jingshun Zhao, Fei Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13413-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544531918454784
author Chengke Yin
Yiwu Sun
Jie Liang
Xin Sui
Zhaoyi He
Ailing Song
Wenjia Xu
Lei Zhang
Yufei Sun
Jingshun Zhao
Fei Han
author_facet Chengke Yin
Yiwu Sun
Jie Liang
Xin Sui
Zhaoyi He
Ailing Song
Wenjia Xu
Lei Zhang
Yufei Sun
Jingshun Zhao
Fei Han
author_sort Chengke Yin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Different anesthetic drugs and techniques may affect survival outcomes for gastric cancer (GC) after surgery. In this study, we investigated the association between sedated and unsedated gastroscopy on survival outcomes in patients with GC after surgery. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with GC by gastroscopy and underwent gastrectomy from January 2013 to December 2017. They were grouped based on the examination modality: propofol-based sedated gastroscopy or unsedated gastroscopy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline variables. Survival outcomes and distant metastases were compared between these two groups. Results Finally, 673 patients were enrolled, 160 in the sedated gastroscopy group and 513 in the unsedated gastroscopy group. After PSM, there were 160 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in overall survival outcomes in the sedated gastroscopy group compared to the unsedated gastroscopy group before PSM (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.531–1.091, P = 0.139) or after PSM (HR = 0.874, 95% CI: 0.564–1.355, P = 0.547). There was no significant difference in the incidence of distant metastases between the two groups before PSM (16.9% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.294) or after PSM (16.9% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.126). To confirm that our patients behaved similarly to other studies, we performed a multivariate analysis and the results showed that sex, pathological TNM stage, Borrmann type, adjuvant treatment, and surgical resection range were all independent factors affecting survival outcomes in our patients. Conclusion Our results showed no significant difference in the effects of sedated gastroscopy vs. unsedated gastroscopy on survival outcomes or distant metastases of patients after gastrectomy for GC.
format Article
id doaj-art-a0d51f053cf340f7a2d6144ccc6225f1
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2407
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj-art-a0d51f053cf340f7a2d6144ccc6225f12025-01-12T12:27:29ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072025-01-0125111210.1186/s12885-024-13413-0Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective studyChengke Yin0Yiwu Sun1Jie Liang2Xin Sui3Zhaoyi He4Ailing Song5Wenjia Xu6Lei Zhang7Yufei Sun8Jingshun Zhao9Fei Han10Department of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dazhou Central HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong University First People’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer HospitalAbstract Background Different anesthetic drugs and techniques may affect survival outcomes for gastric cancer (GC) after surgery. In this study, we investigated the association between sedated and unsedated gastroscopy on survival outcomes in patients with GC after surgery. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with GC by gastroscopy and underwent gastrectomy from January 2013 to December 2017. They were grouped based on the examination modality: propofol-based sedated gastroscopy or unsedated gastroscopy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline variables. Survival outcomes and distant metastases were compared between these two groups. Results Finally, 673 patients were enrolled, 160 in the sedated gastroscopy group and 513 in the unsedated gastroscopy group. After PSM, there were 160 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in overall survival outcomes in the sedated gastroscopy group compared to the unsedated gastroscopy group before PSM (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.531–1.091, P = 0.139) or after PSM (HR = 0.874, 95% CI: 0.564–1.355, P = 0.547). There was no significant difference in the incidence of distant metastases between the two groups before PSM (16.9% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.294) or after PSM (16.9% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.126). To confirm that our patients behaved similarly to other studies, we performed a multivariate analysis and the results showed that sex, pathological TNM stage, Borrmann type, adjuvant treatment, and surgical resection range were all independent factors affecting survival outcomes in our patients. Conclusion Our results showed no significant difference in the effects of sedated gastroscopy vs. unsedated gastroscopy on survival outcomes or distant metastases of patients after gastrectomy for GC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13413-0AnesthesiaGastric cancerSedated gastroscopyUnsedated gastroscopyComfort of gastroscopy
spellingShingle Chengke Yin
Yiwu Sun
Jie Liang
Xin Sui
Zhaoyi He
Ailing Song
Wenjia Xu
Lei Zhang
Yufei Sun
Jingshun Zhao
Fei Han
Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
BMC Cancer
Anesthesia
Gastric cancer
Sedated gastroscopy
Unsedated gastroscopy
Comfort of gastroscopy
title Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_full Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_short Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_sort sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer a retrospective study
topic Anesthesia
Gastric cancer
Sedated gastroscopy
Unsedated gastroscopy
Comfort of gastroscopy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13413-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chengkeyin sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT yiwusun sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT jieliang sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT xinsui sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT zhaoyihe sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT ailingsong sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT wenjiaxu sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT leizhang sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT yufeisun sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT jingshunzhao sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT feihan sedatedandunsedatedgastroscopyhasnoinfluenceontheoutcomesofpatientswithgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy