A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings in the evaluation of patients with suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration. Methods: The medical records of 236 children (under the age of 18 years), on whom a rigid broncho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hakan Taşkınlar, Gökhan Berktuğ Bahadır, Cankat Erdoğan, Doğakan Yiğit, Dinçer Avlan, Ali Naycı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-06-01
Series:Pediatrics and Neonatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875957216302406
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849728056195809280
author Hakan Taşkınlar
Gökhan Berktuğ Bahadır
Cankat Erdoğan
Doğakan Yiğit
Dinçer Avlan
Ali Naycı
author_facet Hakan Taşkınlar
Gökhan Berktuğ Bahadır
Cankat Erdoğan
Doğakan Yiğit
Dinçer Avlan
Ali Naycı
author_sort Hakan Taşkınlar
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study is to determine the role of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings in the evaluation of patients with suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration. Methods: The medical records of 236 children (under the age of 18 years), on whom a rigid bronchoscopy was performed between 1999 and 2015 because of suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration, were analyzed retrospectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings were evaluated. Results: In 71.1% of all cases, the children were under the age of 3 years. The bronchoscopy showed the presence of a foreign body in 52.9% of cases, with the locations of the foreign bodies being as follows: (1) right main bronchus, 47.2%; (2) left main bronchus, 36.0%; (3) trachea, 11.2%; (4) both bronchi, 5.6%. Organic foreign bodies were found in 78% of the patients, whereas inorganic foreign bodies were detected in 22% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings were 98.4% and 54.9%, 47.2% and 74.7%, and 35.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspirations usually occur prior to the age of 3 years, with the most frequently aspirated foreign bodies being food or items of a radiolucent nature. Clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings are not able to detect the presence of a radiolucent foreign body aspiration in children. Therefore, a bronchoscopy should be performed on children in whom a choking event has been witnessed, even in cases of normal radiological and clinical findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-a09b4057f52e4b32b0f4d0e0041d7a4f
institution DOAJ
issn 1875-9572
language English
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Pediatrics and Neonatology
spelling doaj-art-a09b4057f52e4b32b0f4d0e0041d7a4f2025-08-20T03:09:41ZengElsevierPediatrics and Neonatology1875-95722017-06-0158326426910.1016/j.pedneo.2016.07.003A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign BodyHakan TaşkınlarGökhan Berktuğ BahadırCankat ErdoğanDoğakan YiğitDinçer AvlanAli NaycıThe purpose of this study is to determine the role of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings in the evaluation of patients with suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration. Methods: The medical records of 236 children (under the age of 18 years), on whom a rigid bronchoscopy was performed between 1999 and 2015 because of suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration, were analyzed retrospectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings were evaluated. Results: In 71.1% of all cases, the children were under the age of 3 years. The bronchoscopy showed the presence of a foreign body in 52.9% of cases, with the locations of the foreign bodies being as follows: (1) right main bronchus, 47.2%; (2) left main bronchus, 36.0%; (3) trachea, 11.2%; (4) both bronchi, 5.6%. Organic foreign bodies were found in 78% of the patients, whereas inorganic foreign bodies were detected in 22% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings were 98.4% and 54.9%, 47.2% and 74.7%, and 35.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspirations usually occur prior to the age of 3 years, with the most frequently aspirated foreign bodies being food or items of a radiolucent nature. Clinical history, physical examinations, and radiological findings are not able to detect the presence of a radiolucent foreign body aspiration in children. Therefore, a bronchoscopy should be performed on children in whom a choking event has been witnessed, even in cases of normal radiological and clinical findings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875957216302406aspirationbronchoscopyforeign bodies
spellingShingle Hakan Taşkınlar
Gökhan Berktuğ Bahadır
Cankat Erdoğan
Doğakan Yiğit
Dinçer Avlan
Ali Naycı
A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
Pediatrics and Neonatology
aspiration
bronchoscopy
foreign bodies
title A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
title_full A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
title_fullStr A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
title_full_unstemmed A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
title_short A Diagnostic Dilemma for the Pediatrician: Radiolucent Tracheobronchial Foreign Body
title_sort diagnostic dilemma for the pediatrician radiolucent tracheobronchial foreign body
topic aspiration
bronchoscopy
foreign bodies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875957216302406
work_keys_str_mv AT hakantaskınlar adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT gokhanberktugbahadır adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT cankaterdogan adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT dogakanyigit adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT dinceravlan adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT alinaycı adiagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT hakantaskınlar diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT gokhanberktugbahadır diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT cankaterdogan diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT dogakanyigit diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT dinceravlan diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody
AT alinaycı diagnosticdilemmaforthepediatricianradiolucenttracheobronchialforeignbody