Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Introduction: Segmental tibial defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery due to their complexity and high complication rates. This systematic review aimed to evaluate both the effectiveness and outcomes of distraction osteogenesis (D.O.) and the Masquelet technique in treating post-t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni Marrara, Biagio Zampogna, Viktor Dietrich Schick, Leone Larizza, Paolo Rizzo, Ilaria Sanzarello, Matteo Nanni, Danilo Leonetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/1/64
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549458692636672
author Giovanni Marrara
Biagio Zampogna
Viktor Dietrich Schick
Leone Larizza
Paolo Rizzo
Ilaria Sanzarello
Matteo Nanni
Danilo Leonetti
author_facet Giovanni Marrara
Biagio Zampogna
Viktor Dietrich Schick
Leone Larizza
Paolo Rizzo
Ilaria Sanzarello
Matteo Nanni
Danilo Leonetti
author_sort Giovanni Marrara
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Segmental tibial defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery due to their complexity and high complication rates. This systematic review aimed to evaluate both the effectiveness and outcomes of distraction osteogenesis (D.O.) and the Masquelet technique in treating post-traumatic segmental tibial defects. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Relevant retrospective and prospective observational studies with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included. The primary outcome was bone union rate; the secondary outcomes were the type and rate of complications and the clinical and radiological outcomes. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 studies reported data on D.O. and 9 on the Masquelet technique. D.O. demonstrated an overall union rate of 79.4% across 422 patients, and the Masquelet technique demonstrated an overall bone union rate of 85% across 113 patients. For D.O., on average, there was one complication per patient, and with the Masquelet technique, there were 0.5 complications per patient. Conclusions: D.O. and the Masquelet technique are the main treatment options for post-traumatic segmental tibial defects. Although union rates are similar, the Masquelet technique showed fewer complications. Treatment choice should consider patient-specific factors and more comparative studies are needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-9eb371f4e0b741d08937c3cb43b1b2b0
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-9eb371f4e0b741d08937c3cb43b1b2b02025-01-10T13:14:19ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-12-011516410.3390/app15010064Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureGiovanni Marrara0Biagio Zampogna1Viktor Dietrich Schick2Leone Larizza3Paolo Rizzo4Ilaria Sanzarello5Matteo Nanni6Danilo Leonetti7BIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyBIOMORF Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98168 Messina, ItalyIntroduction: Segmental tibial defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery due to their complexity and high complication rates. This systematic review aimed to evaluate both the effectiveness and outcomes of distraction osteogenesis (D.O.) and the Masquelet technique in treating post-traumatic segmental tibial defects. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Relevant retrospective and prospective observational studies with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included. The primary outcome was bone union rate; the secondary outcomes were the type and rate of complications and the clinical and radiological outcomes. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 studies reported data on D.O. and 9 on the Masquelet technique. D.O. demonstrated an overall union rate of 79.4% across 422 patients, and the Masquelet technique demonstrated an overall bone union rate of 85% across 113 patients. For D.O., on average, there was one complication per patient, and with the Masquelet technique, there were 0.5 complications per patient. Conclusions: D.O. and the Masquelet technique are the main treatment options for post-traumatic segmental tibial defects. Although union rates are similar, the Masquelet technique showed fewer complications. Treatment choice should consider patient-specific factors and more comparative studies are needed.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/1/64fracturetibiadefectexternal fixationIlizarovMasquelet
spellingShingle Giovanni Marrara
Biagio Zampogna
Viktor Dietrich Schick
Leone Larizza
Paolo Rizzo
Ilaria Sanzarello
Matteo Nanni
Danilo Leonetti
Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Applied Sciences
fracture
tibia
defect
external fixation
Ilizarov
Masquelet
title Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Post-Traumatic Segmental Tibial Defects Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort post traumatic segmental tibial defects management a systematic review of the literature
topic fracture
tibia
defect
external fixation
Ilizarov
Masquelet
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/1/64
work_keys_str_mv AT giovannimarrara posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT biagiozampogna posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT viktordietrichschick posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT leonelarizza posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT paolorizzo posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ilariasanzarello posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT matteonanni posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT daniloleonetti posttraumaticsegmentaltibialdefectsmanagementasystematicreviewoftheliterature