Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization

ABSTRACT Background Risk factors for the development of fluid overload (FO) and its potential negative effects have not been investigated in dogs. Hypothesis/Objectives Evaluate risk factors and outcomes in hospitalized dogs that received fluids IV and developed clinical signs of FO compared to thos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Pfaff, Emmanuelle M. Butty, Elizabeth A. Rozanski, Armelle M. deLaforcade, Jacqueline N. Hicks, Noa Berlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70132
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849254025413787648
author Alexandra Pfaff
Emmanuelle M. Butty
Elizabeth A. Rozanski
Armelle M. deLaforcade
Jacqueline N. Hicks
Noa Berlin
author_facet Alexandra Pfaff
Emmanuelle M. Butty
Elizabeth A. Rozanski
Armelle M. deLaforcade
Jacqueline N. Hicks
Noa Berlin
author_sort Alexandra Pfaff
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Risk factors for the development of fluid overload (FO) and its potential negative effects have not been investigated in dogs. Hypothesis/Objectives Evaluate risk factors and outcomes in hospitalized dogs that received fluids IV and developed clinical signs of FO compared to those that did not. Animals One hundred thirty‐six dogs that developed FO and 109 dogs without FO. Methods Retrospective observational study of hospitalized dogs. Variables were compared between dogs that developed clinical signs of FO (FO group) and dogs without FO (control group). Results Compared to the control group, dogs in the FO group were significantly more likely to have cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 18.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4–60), protein‐losing nephropathy (OR, 15.3; 95% CI, 2.0–116.8), chronic kidney disease (OR, 10; 95% CI, 3.0–33.8), and acute kidney injury (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.5–10.6). The total fluid volume administered IV was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.16). Only 6.0% of dogs with clinical signs of FO gained > 10% weight from non‐dehydrated baseline and thus met the FO definition used in human medicine. Compared with the control group, dogs with FO had a significantly longer median duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001) and were less likely to survive to discharge (p < 0.001). Conclusions and Clinical Importance FO was more common with certain underlying diseases but not associated with total fluid volume administered IV. The definition for FO in human medicine using weight gain requires further evaluation in dogs. FO was associated with worse outcomes and longer hospitalization time.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d89db3c17e94005aeb41640b0fadd0f
institution Kabale University
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
spelling doaj-art-9d89db3c17e94005aeb41640b0fadd0f2025-08-20T03:56:09ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762025-07-01394n/an/a10.1111/jvim.70132Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During HospitalizationAlexandra Pfaff0Emmanuelle M. Butty1Elizabeth A. Rozanski2Armelle M. deLaforcade3Jacqueline N. Hicks4Noa Berlin5Department of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts USADepartment of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts USADepartment of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts USADepartment of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts USADepartment of Biostatistics School of Public Health, Boston University Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts USAABSTRACT Background Risk factors for the development of fluid overload (FO) and its potential negative effects have not been investigated in dogs. Hypothesis/Objectives Evaluate risk factors and outcomes in hospitalized dogs that received fluids IV and developed clinical signs of FO compared to those that did not. Animals One hundred thirty‐six dogs that developed FO and 109 dogs without FO. Methods Retrospective observational study of hospitalized dogs. Variables were compared between dogs that developed clinical signs of FO (FO group) and dogs without FO (control group). Results Compared to the control group, dogs in the FO group were significantly more likely to have cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 18.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4–60), protein‐losing nephropathy (OR, 15.3; 95% CI, 2.0–116.8), chronic kidney disease (OR, 10; 95% CI, 3.0–33.8), and acute kidney injury (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.5–10.6). The total fluid volume administered IV was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.16). Only 6.0% of dogs with clinical signs of FO gained > 10% weight from non‐dehydrated baseline and thus met the FO definition used in human medicine. Compared with the control group, dogs with FO had a significantly longer median duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001) and were less likely to survive to discharge (p < 0.001). Conclusions and Clinical Importance FO was more common with certain underlying diseases but not associated with total fluid volume administered IV. The definition for FO in human medicine using weight gain requires further evaluation in dogs. FO was associated with worse outcomes and longer hospitalization time.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70132edemafluid administrationfluid balancehypervolemia
spellingShingle Alexandra Pfaff
Emmanuelle M. Butty
Elizabeth A. Rozanski
Armelle M. deLaforcade
Jacqueline N. Hicks
Noa Berlin
Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
edema
fluid administration
fluid balance
hypervolemia
title Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
title_full Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
title_fullStr Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
title_short Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors and Outcome in Dogs With and Without Fluid Overload During Hospitalization
title_sort retrospective evaluation of risk factors and outcome in dogs with and without fluid overload during hospitalization
topic edema
fluid administration
fluid balance
hypervolemia
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70132
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrapfaff retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization
AT emmanuellembutty retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization
AT elizabetharozanski retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization
AT armellemdelaforcade retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization
AT jacquelinenhicks retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization
AT noaberlin retrospectiveevaluationofriskfactorsandoutcomeindogswithandwithoutfluidoverloadduringhospitalization