Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia

Background and aim Amblyopia is one of the most common causes of loss of vision in children. Unfortunately, in high pediatric anisometropia, spectacle correction is not tolerated by many children. Also, contact-lens wear by children may seem to be extremely challenging, difficult, and unrewarding. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed A. Farrag, Mahmoud A.B. Mohamed, Hasan S. Yousef
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/azmj.azmj_19_22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841525313289322496
author Ahmed A. Farrag
Mahmoud A.B. Mohamed
Hasan S. Yousef
author_facet Ahmed A. Farrag
Mahmoud A.B. Mohamed
Hasan S. Yousef
author_sort Ahmed A. Farrag
collection DOAJ
description Background and aim Amblyopia is one of the most common causes of loss of vision in children. Unfortunately, in high pediatric anisometropia, spectacle correction is not tolerated by many children. Also, contact-lens wear by children may seem to be extremely challenging, difficult, and unrewarding. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia resistant to conservative treatment. Patients and methods A prospective nonrandomized clinical study was carried out on 56 eyes of 56 children with anisometropia resistant to usual treatment. Refractive surgery was conducted and according to its type, the included patients were divided. Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) group included 26 patients, while Photorefracive Keratectomy (PRK) group included 15 children besides 15 patients in implantable collamer lens (ICL) group. Complete ophthalmologic examination was performed before and after surgery for all groups with follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Results Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA), Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), and refractive parameters improved dramatically in all groups with more significant improvement in LASIK group in comparison with the other groups. However, the preservation of BCVA was better with the ICL at both immediate healing period and through the 18-month follow-up. Sensory tests did not show significant changes in all groups. Conclusion Refractive surgery is safe and effective for pediatric anisometropia treatment. LASIK has better visual outcomes and ICL has more preserved outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d7b6d60cead42c6ba095e4da0875768
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-1693
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-9d7b6d60cead42c6ba095e4da08757682025-01-17T15:44:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAl-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal1687-16932024-01-01221101710.4103/azmj.azmj_19_22Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropiaAhmed A. FarragMahmoud A.B. MohamedHasan S. YousefBackground and aim Amblyopia is one of the most common causes of loss of vision in children. Unfortunately, in high pediatric anisometropia, spectacle correction is not tolerated by many children. Also, contact-lens wear by children may seem to be extremely challenging, difficult, and unrewarding. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia resistant to conservative treatment. Patients and methods A prospective nonrandomized clinical study was carried out on 56 eyes of 56 children with anisometropia resistant to usual treatment. Refractive surgery was conducted and according to its type, the included patients were divided. Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) group included 26 patients, while Photorefracive Keratectomy (PRK) group included 15 children besides 15 patients in implantable collamer lens (ICL) group. Complete ophthalmologic examination was performed before and after surgery for all groups with follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Results Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA), Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), and refractive parameters improved dramatically in all groups with more significant improvement in LASIK group in comparison with the other groups. However, the preservation of BCVA was better with the ICL at both immediate healing period and through the 18-month follow-up. Sensory tests did not show significant changes in all groups. Conclusion Refractive surgery is safe and effective for pediatric anisometropia treatment. LASIK has better visual outcomes and ICL has more preserved outcomes.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/azmj.azmj_19_22anisometropiarefractivesensoryamblyopia
spellingShingle Ahmed A. Farrag
Mahmoud A.B. Mohamed
Hasan S. Yousef
Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
anisometropia
refractive
sensory
amblyopia
title Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
title_full Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
title_fullStr Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
title_full_unstemmed Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
title_short Visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
title_sort visual and sensory outcomes after refractive surgery for pediatric anisometropia
topic anisometropia
refractive
sensory
amblyopia
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/azmj.azmj_19_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedafarrag visualandsensoryoutcomesafterrefractivesurgeryforpediatricanisometropia
AT mahmoudabmohamed visualandsensoryoutcomesafterrefractivesurgeryforpediatricanisometropia
AT hasansyousef visualandsensoryoutcomesafterrefractivesurgeryforpediatricanisometropia